Ecological Accounting Based on Extended Exergy: A Sustainability Perspective
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Jing Dai ; Bin Chen ; Enrico Sciubba
- 刊名：Environmental Science & Technology
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：August 19, 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：48
- 期：16
- 页码：9826-9833
- 全文大小：276K
- ISSN：1520-5851
文摘
The excessive energy consumption, environmental pollution, and ecological destruction problems have gradually become huge obstacles for the development of societal鈥揺conomic鈥搉atural complex ecosystems. Regarding the national ecological鈥揺conomic system, how to make explicit the resource accounting, diagnose the resource conversion, and measure the disturbance of environmental emissions to the systems are the fundamental basis of sustainable development and coordinated management. This paper presents an extended exergy (EE) accounting including the material exergy and exergy equivalent of externalities consideration in a systematic process from production to consumption, and China in 2010 is chosen as a case study to foster an in-depth understanding of the conflict between high-speed development and the available resources. The whole society is decomposed into seven sectors (i.e., Agriculture, Extraction, Conversion, Industry, Transportation, Tertiary, and Domestic sectors) according to their distinct characteristics. An adaptive EE accounting database, which incorporates traditional energy, renewable energy, mineral element, and other natural resources as well as resource-based secondary products, is constructed on the basis of the internal flows in the system. In addition, the environmental emission accounting has been adjusted to calculate the externalities-equivalent exergy. The results show that the EE value for the year 2010 in China was 1.80 脳 1014 MJ, which is greatly increased. Furthermore, an EE-based sustainability indices system has been established to provide an epitomized exploration for evaluating the performance of flows and storages with the system from a sustainability perspective. The value of the EE-based sustainability indicator was calculated to be 0.23, much lower than the critical value of 1, implying that China is still developing in the stages of high energy consumption and a low sustainability level.