Differences in Gasification Behaviors and Related Properties between Entrained Gasifier Fly Ash and Coal Char
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Jing Gu ; Shiyong Wu ; Youqing Wu ; Ye Li ; Jinsheng Gao
- 刊名：Energy & Fuels
- 出版年：2008
- 出版时间：November 19, 2008
- 年：2008
- 卷：22
- 期：6
- 页码：4029-4033
- 全文大小：174K
- 年卷期：v.22,no.6(November 19, 2008)
- ISSN：1520-5029
文摘
In the study, two fly ash samples from Texaco gasifiers were compared to coal char and the physical and chemical properties and reactivity of samples were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SEM−energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), N2 and CO2 adsorption method, and isothermal thermogravimetric analysis. The main results were obtained. The carbon content of gasified fly ashes exhibited 31−37%, which was less than the carbon content of 58−59% in the feed coal. The fly ashes exhibited higher Brunauer−Emmett−Teller (BET) surface area, richer meso- and micropores, more disordered carbon crystalline structure, and better CO2 gasification reactivity than coal char. Ashes in fly ashes occurred to agglomerate into larger spherical grains, while those in coal char do not agglomerate. The minerals in fly ashes, especial alkali and alkaline-earth metals, had a catalytic effect on gasification reactivity of fly ash carbon. In the low-temperature range, the gasification process of fly ashes is mainly in chemical control, while in the high-temperature range, it is mainly in gas diffusion control, which was similar to coal char. In addition, the carbon in fly ashes was partially gasified and activated by water vapor and exhibited higher BET surface area and better gasification activity. Consequently, the fact that these carbons in fly ashes from entrained flow gasifiers are reclaimed and reused will be considered to be feasible.