An Overview of Unconventional Resources of Romania. Pending Challenges
详细信息 查看全文
- 关键词：Assessment units ; Basin ; centered gas ; Clathrates ; Coal bed methane ; Gas ; Oil ; Plays ; Romania ; Tight gas ; Unconventional
- 刊名：The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry
- 出版年：2017
- 出版时间：2017
- 年：2017
- 卷：52
- 期：1
- 页码：97-139
- 参考文献：1.Krezsek C, Lange S, Olaru R, Ungureanu C, Namaz P, Dudus R, Turi V (2012) Non-conventional plays in Romania: the experience of OMV Petrom. SPE 153028. In: SPE/EAGE European unconventional resources conference and exhibition, Vienna
2.Velciu S, Popescu B (2012) Are the Paleozoic plays the future of unconventional gas in Romania? An attempt of assessing the resource: Romania Gas Forum Bucuresti, 3 October 2012. http://www.petroleumclub.ro/downloads/GasForum
3.Anastasiu N, Antonescu NN, Patruți A, German M, Purica I (eds) (2013) Natural gas resources from unconventional fields – potential and recovery. Com., Nat., Roman al Consiliului Mondial al Energiei – Centrul European de Excelenta in domeniul gazelornaturale din argile gazeifere, București, p 345 (in Romanian)
4.Charpentier R, Cook AT (2011) USGS methodology for assessing continuous petroleum resources. U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2011–1167, p 73. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1167/OF11-1167.pdf
5.Ilinca G (2010) Field guide series. Acta Mineral Petrogr Szeged 23:50
6.Popescu B, Veliciu S (2014) Tandarei and Radauti formations: future unconventional explo-ration plays in Romania. Search and Discovery, Article 80369
7.Seghedi A, Vaida M, Iordan M, Verniers J (2005) Paleozoic evolution of the Romanian part of the Moesian platform: an overview. Geol Belg 8(4):99–120
8.Popescu BM, Micu M, Tari G (2016) The Moldova slope and basin as a collage with multiple structural overprints: implications for shale gas potential. Abstract. In: AAPG conference –petroleum systems of Alpine-Mediterranean Fold Belts and Basins, Bucharest, 19–20 May 2016
9.Tari G, Poprawa P, Krzywiec P (2012) Silurian Lithofacies and Paleogeography in Central and Eastern Europe: implications for shale gas exploration. SPE 151606. In: SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna
10.Veliciu S, Popescu B (2013) An essay to evaluating unconventional gas resources form the Paleozoic deposits of Romania. Monitorul de Petrol & Gaze 1(131):14–25 (in Romanian)
11.Popescu BM (2014) Unconventional resource portfolio of Romania. In: 12th WEC & Eastern Europe Energy Forum – Regional FOREN 2014, Bucharest, 22–26 June 2014
12.Kotarba MJ, Wieclaw D, Kosakowski P, Wrobel M, Matyszkiewicz J, Bula Z, Krajevwski M, Koltun YV, Tarkowski J (2011) Petroleum systems in the Paleozoic-Mesozoic basement of the Polish and Ukrainian parts of the Carpathian Foredeep. An Soc Geol Pol 81:487–522
13.Kotarba M, Koltun Y (2006) In: Golonka J, Picha FJ (eds) The Carpathians: geology and hydrocarbon resources, vol 84, Am. Assoc. Petr. Geol. Memoir., pp 395–443CrossRef
14.Sachsenhorfer RF, Koltun YV (2012) Black shales in Ukraine – a review. Mar Pet Geol 31:125–136CrossRef
15.Batistatu MV, Neagu DD (2008) Băilești Depression Potential. In: Bul., Univ. Petrol-Gaze, Ploiesti. Ser. Tech. LX, vol 4, pp 220–226 (in Romanian)
16.Gheorghe S, Barbuliceanu N, Raschitor G, Bruneiu L (2005) Comparative study of carbonate and clayey source rocks in the area of Bibesti-Bulbuceni-Malu Mare-Făuresti and Mitorfani. Rev Rom Petr. Dec: 1–12 (in Romanian)
17.Francovschi I, Roban R-D, Gradinaru E, Ciobotaru V (2014) Geochemistry of Neoproterozoic shales from the Kalius Member: assessing the sedimentary provenance and paleo-weathering. Inst Geol Seis Bull 2:14–23
18.Patruț I, Butac A, Baltes N (1983) Main stages of hydrocarbon generation and accumulation on the Romanian territory of the Moesian platform. An. Ins. Geol. Geophys., LX., ser. Tect-Petrol & Gaz: 315–322
19.Gheorghe S, Barbuliceanu N, Sindilar V (2004) Jurassic source rocks in Moesian platform. In: Dinu C, Mocanu V (eds) Geology tectonics and hydrocarbon potential of the Romanian Moesian platform, BGF special volume 3. pp 81–86
20.Tari G, Ciudin D, Kostner A, Raileanu A, Tulucan A, Vacarescu G, Vanghelov D (2011) Play types of the Moesian platform in Romania and Bulgaria. Search & Discovery, Article 10311
21.Vinogradov C (1998) Depositional systems and facies of the Mesozoic and Paleogene of the Barlad depression. An Șt Univ Al I Cuza: 193–203 (in Romanian)
22.Bucur I (1997) Mesozoic formations from the Reșița-Moldova Nouă Zone. Presa Universitara Clujeana, Cluj-Napoca, p 214 (in Romanian)
23.Popa ME (2013) Coal bed methane (MASC, CGM). In: Anastasiu et al (eds) Natural gas resources from unconventional fields – potential and recovery 123–127 (in Romanian)
24.Grasu C, Miclăuș¸ C, Florea F, Saramet M (2007) Geology and economic exploitation of the bituminous rocks from Romania. Editura Univ. Al. I. Cuza – Iași, p 253 (in Romanian)
25.Amadori ML, Belayouni H, Guerrera F, Martin M, Martin-Rojas I, Miclăuş C, Raffaelli G (2012) New data on the Vrancea Nappe (Moldavidian Basin, Outer Carpathian Domain, Romania): paleogeographic and geodynamic reconstructions. Int J Earth Sci 101:1599–1623CrossRef
26.Stefanescu M, Baltes N (1996) Do hydrocarbon prospects still exist in the Eastern-Carpathians Cretaceous flysch nappes? Mem Mus Nat ’Hist Nat 170:427–438
27.Alexandrescu G (1971) Study of the Cretaceous internal and external flysch between Valea Bistricioara and Moldova valleys (Eastern Carpathians). Summary of the PhD Thesis, University of Bucharest, p 43 (in Romanian)
28.Anastasiu N, Popa M, Vârban B (1995) Facies analysis on Oligocene formations from outer Flysch zone (the Eastern Carpathians); a reconsideration. Assoc Geol Carp – Balk Congr XV 4:317–323
29.Popescu BM (1995) Romania’s petroleum systems and their remaining potential. Pet Geosci 1:337–350CrossRef
30.De Broucker G, Mellin A, Duindam P (1998) Tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Transyl-vanian Basin, pre-salt sequence, Romania. In: Dinu C (ed) BGF, Special volume 1. pp 36–70
31.Krezsek C, Bally AW (2006) The Transylvanian Basin (Romania) and its relation to the Carpathian fold and thrust belt: insights in gravitational salt tectonics. Mar Pet Geol 23:405–442CrossRef
32.Radu G, Sorescu E (2013) Transylvania Basin – unconventional gas outlook. Abstract. In: AAPG conference. Exploring the pathway from Europe to Asia, Tbilisi, 26–27 September
33.Cranganu C, Deming D (1996) Heat flow and hydrocarbon generation in the Transylvanian Basin, Romania. AAPG Bull 80(10):1641–1653
34.Ruiz J, Naccache P, Priestley A, Guenther G, Crecana V (2013) Modelling in-situ combustion in a heavy oil filed in Romania. SPE paper 165490, in SPE Heavy Oil Conference, Calgary, 11–13 June 2013
35.Carcoana A (1990) Results and difficulties of the world’ larges in-situ combustion process: Suplacu de Barcau Field, Romania. In: SPE/DOE 7th symposium on enhanced oil recovery, Article 20248, pp 729–736
36.Vacarescu G (1999) Petroleum systems in the Romanian sector of the Pannonian Depression. Rev Rom Pet Dec: 7–18 (in Romanian)
37.Tambrea D (2007) Subsidence and tectono-thermal analysis of the Istria depression. Implica-tions in hydrocarbon generation. PhD thesis, Bucharest, p 220 (in Romanian)
38.Bohrmann G, Ivanov M, Foucher JP (2003) Mud volcanoes and gas hydrates in the Black Sea: new data from Dvurechenskii and Odessa mud volcanoes. Geo-Mar Lett 23(3–4):239–249CrossRef
39.Shimkus KM, Moskalenko VN, Khakhalev AM, Shelting SK (1997) New data on the structure and seismostratigraphy of the Danube fan. Oceanology 37(2):295–302
40.Vassilev A, Dimitrov L (2002) Spatial and quantity evaluation of the Black Sea gas hydrates. Russ Geol Geophys 43(7):672–684
41.Kuuskraa V, Stevens ST, Moodhe K (2013) World shale gas and shale oil resources by Advanced Resources International on behalf of US EIA worldwide assessment. http://www.adv-res.com/pdf/A_EIA_ARI_2013%20World%20Shale%20Gas%20and%20Shale%20Oil%20Resource%20Assessment.pdf
42.IEA (2012) Golden rules for a golden age of gas. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA, Paris, p 143. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2012/goldenrules/weo2012_goldenrulesreport.pdf
43.Crânganu C (2014) Gas shales and hydraulic fracturing. Myth and reality. Editura Integral, Bucharest, p 287 (in Romanian)
44.Aroldi C (2001) The Pienides in Maramures¸ – sedimentation, tectonics and paleogeography. Presa Universitară, Cluj-Napoca, p 156
45.Baltes N, Antonescu E, Grigorescu D, Alexandrescu G, Micu M (1984) The Black Shales formation of the Eastern Carpathians, lithostratigraphy and oil potential. Annale Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Bucharest, vol 59, pp 79–88
46.Oaie G (2013) Gas hydrates from the continental shelf of the Black Sea. In: Anastasiu et al (eds) Natural gas resources from unconventional fields – potential and Recovery: 127–133 (in Romanian)
47.Roban RD (2008) Sedimentological study of the Paleogene formations from NE Getic Depression; paleoambiental reconstructions. PhD thesis, University of Bucha- rest, p 242 (in Romanian)
48.U.S. EPA (2015) Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking Water Resources (External Review Draft). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-15/047. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/hfstudy/recordisplay.cfm?deid=244651
49.Krézsek C, Lăpădat A, Maţenco L, Arnberger K, Barbu V, Olaru R (2013) Strain partitioning at orogenic contacts during rotation, strike–slip and oblique convergence: Paleogene–Early Miocene evolution of the contact between the South Carpathians and Moesia. Global Planet Change 103:63–81CrossRef - 作者单位：Bogdan M. Popescu (5)
Nicolae Anastasiu (6)
5. Zeta Petroleum plc, 1 Berkeley St, London, W1J 8DJ, UK
6. Romanian Academy, Calea Victoriei 125, 010093, Bucharest, Romania - 丛书名：Shale Gas: Ecology, Politics, Economy
- ISBN：978-3-319-50275-5
- 卷排序：52
文摘
Romania has a quite large inventory of unconventional continuous plays in the Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic periods mainly in the foreland and back-arc basins. The assessing of units evaluated so far, following the EIA and USGS methodology is underway but first results indicate technically recoverable resources of 1,000 billion m3 of gas and 500 million bbl of oil. They show a tangible potential for investors once a specific legal framework is in place. The geological challenges for evaluating this category of resources are rather important because of the lack of novel information resulting from modern exploration and the classification regime of older one. The political hurdles are related to incomplete regulations, absence of community co-involvement, and the lack of any policy promoting the development of unconventional resources. The environmental debate has been very present in Romania and shall hopefully be solved with an unceasing consultation with the public society once new, transparent rules are set up.