用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Framework for airfield pavements management—an approach based on cost-effectiveness analysis
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Muhammad Irfan ; Muhammad Bilal Khurshid ; Shahid Iqbal…
  • 关键词:Decision support systems ; Life cycle costs ; Maintenance ; Pavement management ; Rehabilitation ; Statistical models
  • 刊名:European Transport Research Review
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:June 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:7
  • 期:2
  • 全文大小:1,646 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Haas, R, Hudson, WR, Zaniewski, J (1994) Modern pavement management. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar
    2. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (2007) Guidelines and procedures for maintenance of airport pavements. Advisory CircularNo.AC 150/5380-6B, September 2007
    3. MicroPAVER. “U.S. Army Construction Engineering Laboratory (USA-CERL), Engineering and Resources Development Centre- Champaign, IL, 2003
    4. McNerney MT, Harrison R (1995) Enhanced pavement management systems for airports: a Full cost analysis of operational impacts, Conference Proceedings,1995,pp. 496-10
    5. Applied Research Associates (ARA) (2011) Life cycle cost analysis for airport pavements- Airfield Asphalt Pavement Technology Program (AAPTP), 277 Technology ParkwayAuburn, AL
    6. Broten M, Wade M (2004) How to sustain a pavement management system at a commercial-service airport,-Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Managing Pavements, Queensland, Australia, 2004
    7. Michigan Department of Transportation, Capital Preventive Maintenance Program Guidelines, Maintenance Division, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI, 1999
    8. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Pavement Preventive Maintenance Program Guidelines, Office of Materials and Road Research, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2001
    9. Ohio Department of Transportation (2001) Pavement Preventive Maintenance Program Guidelines- The Office of Pavement Engineering, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, 2001
    10. California Department of Transportation, “Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide-Volume-Flexible Pavement Preservation, 2nd ed., Division of Maintenance, Office of Pavement Preservation, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2008
    11. U.S. Department of Defence (US DoD) (2004). Unified Facilities Criteria on Pavement Maintenance Management, UFC 3-70, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington
    12. Ismail N, Ismail A, Rahmat OK (2009) Development of expert system for airport pavement maintenance and rehabilitation. Eur J Sci Res ISSN 1450-216X Vol.35 No.1, 2009, pp. 121-29
    13. Baladi, GY, Novak, EC, Kuo, WH pavement condition index remaining service life- Pavement management implementation. In: Holt, FB, Gramling, WL eds. (1992) STP 1121. American Society for Testing and Material, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 63-90
    14. Lee, H Standardization of Distress Measurements for the Network-Level Pavement Management Systems-Pavement Management Implementation. In: Holt, FB, Gramling, WL eds. (1992) STP 1121. American Society for Testing and Material, Philadelphia, pp. 424-436
    15. Monismith CL (1978) Considerations in airport pavement management- Transportation Research Board, Special Report 175, 1978,pp. 10-4
    16. Hudson WR, Uddin W (1987) Future pavement evaluation technologies: prospects and opportunities- Presented atSecond North American Conf. on Managing Pavements, Toronto, Canada, 1987
    17. Lytton RL (1987) Concepts of pavement performance prediction and modeling- Presented atSecond North American Conf. on Managing Pavements, Toronto, Canada, 1987
    18. Butt AA (1991) Application of markov process to pavement management systems at the network level-Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1991
    19. Rada, GR, Schwartz, CW, Witczak, MW, Rabinow, SD (1992) Integrated pavement management system for kennedy international airport. J Transp Eng 118: pp. 666-685 CrossRef
    20. Zaniewski J (1991) Unified methodology for airport pavement analysis and design- Technical Report, Federal Aviation Administration- Research and Development Service, Washington, DC.,1991
    21. Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) (2011) “Common airport pavement maintenance practices. Transportation Research Board, A Synthesis of Airport Practice (Synthesis No. 22), Washington, D.C
    22. Shahin, MY (2002) Pavement management for airport, roads and parking lots. Springer, Second Edition
    23. Irfan M, Khurshid MB, Bai Q, Labi S, Morin TL (2012) Establishing optimal project -level strategies for pavement maintenance & rehabilitation -a framework and case study. Taylor & Francis’s J Eng Optim 44(5):565-89
    24. Wade M, Peshkin D, Smith K, Yu HT (2007) Estimating remaining life of airfield pavements, Proceedings of the 27thInternational Air Transportation Conference, Advancing Airfield Pavements, American Society of Civil Engineers, VA, 2007
    25. Khurshid, MB, Irfan, M, Labi, S (2011) Optimal performance threshold determination for highway asset interventions: analytical framework and application. J Transp Eng 137: pp. 128-139
  • 刊物主题:Civil Engineering; Transportation; Automotive Engineering; Regional/Spatial Science;
  • 出版者:Springer Berlin Heidelberg
  • ISSN:1866-8887
文摘
Purpose and research question The agencies responsible to operate and maintain airfields in developing countries manage the airfield pavements on need to do/ reactive basis instead of resorting to performance based preventive maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) activity profiles. Extracting due cognizance from literature on internationally recognized airfield pavements management systems, this research article presents a framework of the step-wise procedure for airfield pavement management system. Methods M&R effectiveness is quantified based upon area bounded by the pavement performance curve and cost is the present worth of total cost incurred by the agency. The evaluation and prioritization of different alternatives is based on life cycle cost analysis and cost effectiveness index. The case study for an in-service airfield has also been presented to demonstrate the application of proposed methodology. Results The evaluated M&R alternatives for a given preservation scenario include: Joint Filling, Patching and 2-thick overlay; Milling and 2-thick AC overlay of mid-section (keel) section; Replacement with complete 4-thick AC Overlay; and Re-construction of complete airfield. The analysis results revealed that Mill and 2-thick AC overlay of mid-section was the most cost effective alternative entailing minimum cost while yielding maximum benefit pavement performance. Conclusions The developed pavement management process provides systematic and objective procedures for maintaining the inventory of pavement infrastructure, monitoring pavement performance, selecting optimal treatment and its application time. The proposed management system for the airfield pavements will not only prioritize the areas for repair/ maintenance but also give a cost-effective solution for enhancing the airfield pavement service life..

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700