用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Making Choices: Ethical Decisions in a Global Context
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Sheila Bonde ; Clyde Briant ; Paul Firenze…
  • 关键词:Ethics training ; Research ethics ; Cultural relativity ; Ethics across the curriculum ; Assessment ; Responsible conduct of research
  • 刊名:Science and Engineering Ethics
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:April 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:22
  • 期:2
  • 页码:343-366
  • 全文大小:584 KB
  • 参考文献:Bagdasarov, Z., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L. N., Devenport, L. D., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 1305–1322.CrossRef
    Barnhart, M. (Ed.). (2002). Varieties of ethical reflection: New directions for ethics in a global context. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    Benatar, S. R. (2002). Some reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Social Science and Medicine, 54(7), 1131–1141.CrossRef
    Benatar, S. R. (2004). Towards progress in resolving dilemmas in international research ethics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 32(4), 574–582.CrossRef
    Benatar, S. R., Daar, A., & Singer, P. A. (2003). Global health ethics: The rationale for mutual caring. International Affairs, 79, 107–138.CrossRef
    Bishop, R. (1998). Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research: A Maori approach to creating knowledge. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11, 199–219.CrossRef
    Bullock, M., & Panicker, S. (2003). Ethics for all: Differences across scientific society codes. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 159–170.CrossRef
    Denzin, N. K. (2005). Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 933–958). London: Sage Publication.
    Downey, G. L., Lucena, J., & Mitcham, C. (2007). Engineering ethics and identity: Emerging initiatives in comparative perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 463–487.CrossRef
    Elliott, D. (2007). Ethics in the first person: A guide to teaching and learning practical ethics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
    Forsyth, D., O’Boyle, E. H, Jr, & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). East meets west: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 831–833.CrossRef
    Frost, M. (2009). Global ethics: Anarchy, freedom and international relations. London: Routledge.
    Harris, C. E, Jr. (2004). Internationalizing professional codes in Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 503–521.CrossRef
    Ip, P. K. (2009). Is confucianism good for business ethics in China? Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 463–476.CrossRef
    Kim, S., Phillips, W. R., Pinsky, L., Brock, D., Phillips, K., & Keary, J. (2006). A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: A review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Medical Education, 40, 867–876.
    Klestova, Z., & Makarenko, A. (2002). Conflict of interest between eastern and western scientific systems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 387–392.CrossRef
    Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., Mumford, M. D., & Hougen, D. F. (2008). Application of a sense-making approach to training in the physical sciences and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 251–278.CrossRef
    Kolodner, J. L. (1992). An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 6, 3–34.CrossRef
    Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Luegenbiehl, H. C. (2004). Ethical autonomy and engineering in a cross-cultural context. Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(1), 57–78.
    Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N. J., Hart, J., & Diller, K. R. (2005). Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 257–276.CrossRef
    Miner, M., & Petocz, A. (2003). Moral theory in ethical decision making: Problems, clarification and recommendations from a psychological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 21.CrossRef
    Mishkin, B. (1999). Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends. Science and Engineering Ethics, 5, 293–298.CrossRef
    Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, S., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., et al. (2007). Sense-making approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 17, 337–366.CrossRef
    Muskavitch, K. M. T. (2005). Commentary on ‘connecting case-based ethics instruction with educational theory’. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 431–434.CrossRef
    Mutua, K., & Swadener, B. B. (2004). Decolonizing research in cross-cultural contexts: Critical personal narratives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Patai, D. (1991). US academics and third-world women: Is ethical research possible? In S. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practise of oral history (pp. 137–153). New York: Routledge.
    Pustovit, S. V. (2006). Some methodological aspects of committees’ expertise: The Ukranian example. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 85–94.CrossRef
    Rhoades, L., & Górski, A. (2000). Scientific misconduct: An international perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6, 5–10.CrossRef
    Shigemi, I., & Richard, K. L. (Eds.). (2001). Crossing cultural borders: Toward an ethics of intercultural communication: Beyond reciprocal anthropology. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.
    Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
    Sterba, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Ethics: Classical western texts in feminist and multicultural perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Vallero, D. (2007). Beyond responsible conduct in research: New pedagogies to address macroethics of nanobiotechnologies. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 17(7), 1–12.CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Sheila Bonde (1)
    Clyde Briant (2)
    Paul Firenze (3)
    Julianne Hanavan (4)
    Amy Huang (1)
    Min Li (5)
    N. C. Narayanan (6)
    D. Parthasarathy (7)
    Hongqin Zhao (8)

    1. Department of History of Art and Architecture, Brown University, Box 1855, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
    2. School of Engineering, Brown University, Box D, 184 Hope Street, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
    3. Humanities and Social Sciences, Wentworth Institute of Technology, 550 Huntingdon Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
    4. Research Ethics and Education Policy, Office of the Vice President for Research, Brown University, 47 George Street, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
    5. Department of Linguistics, Zhejiang University, 308 Alumni Center, Hangzhou, 310058, China
    6. Centre for Technology Alternatives for Rural Areas, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India
    7. Department of Humanities and Social Science, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India
    8. School of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China
  • 刊物主题:Ethics; Philosophy of Science; Engineering, general; Biomedical Engineering; Medicine/Public Health, general; Philosophy;
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1471-5546
文摘
The changing milieu of research—increasingly global, interdisciplinary and collaborative—prompts greater emphasis on cultural context and upon partnership with international scholars and diverse community groups. Ethics training, however, tends to ignore the cross-cultural challenges of making ethical choices. This paper confronts those challenges by presenting a new curricular model developed by an international team. It examines ethics across a very broad range of situations, using case studies and employing the perspectives of social science, humanities and the sciences. The course has been developed and taught in a highly collaborative way, involving researchers and students at Zhejiang University, the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay and Brown University. The article presents the curricular modules of the course, learning outcomes, an assessment framework developed for the project, and a discussion of evaluation findings.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700