Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Elizabeth Wager^a ; ¹ ; ² ; ^{liz@sideview.demon.co.uk} ; Sabine Kleinert^b ; ¹ ; ³
• 关键词：Research integrity ; Publication ethics
• 刊名：Maturitas
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：192_03785122
• 类别：med
• 出版时间：June, 2012
• 卷：72
• 期：2
• 页码：165-169
• 文件大小：133 K

摘要

Institutions and journals both have important duties relating to research and publication misconduct. Institutions are responsible for the conduct of their researchers and for encouraging a healthy research environment. Journals are responsible for the conduct of their editors, for safeguarding the research record, and for ensuring the reliability of everything they publish. It is therefore important for institutions and journals to communicate and collaborate effectively on cases relating to research integrity. To achieve this, we make the following recommendations.

Institutions should:

鈥?/dt>

have a research integrity officer (or office) and publish their contact details prominently;

鈥?/dt>

inform journals about cases of proven misconduct that affect the reliability or attribution of work that they have published;

鈥?/dt>

respond to journals if they request information about issues, such as disputed authorship, misleading reporting, competing interests, or other factors, including honest errors, that could affect the reliability of published work;

鈥?/dt>

initiate inquiries into allegations of research misconduct or unacceptable publication practice raised by journals;

鈥?/dt>

have policies supporting responsible research conduct and systems in place for investigating suspected research misconduct.

Journals should:

鈥?/dt>

publish the contact details of their editor-in-chief who should act as the point of contact for questions relating to research and publication integrity;

鈥?/dt>

inform institutions if they suspect misconduct by their researchers, and provide evidence to support these concerns;

鈥?/dt>

cooperate with investigations and respond to institutions鈥?questions about misconduct allegations;

鈥?/dt>

be prepared to issue retractions or corrections (according to the COPE guidelines on retractions) when provided with findings of misconduct arising from investigations;

鈥?/dt>

have policies for responding to institutions and other organizations that investigate cases of research misconduct.