Caring for individual patients and beyond: Enhancing care through secondary use of data in a general practice setting

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Marianne Tolar ; ^{mtolar@sfu.ca} ; Ellen Balka ^{ellenb@sfu.ca}
• 关键词：Medical records systems ; Computerized ; Community health centres ; Primary health care ; Organizational case studies ; Quality assurance ; Health care ; Reminder systems
• 刊名：International Journal of Medical Informatics
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：133_13865056
• 类别：med
• 出版时间：July, 2012
• 卷：81
• 期：7
• 页码：461-474
• 文件大小：431 K

摘要

It is argued that with the introduction of electronic medical record (EMR) systems into the primary care sector, data collected can be used for secondary purposes which extend beyond individual patient care (e.g., for chronic disease management, prevention and clinical performance evaluation). However, EMR systems are primarily designed to support clinical tasks, and data entry practices of clinicians focus on the treatment of individual patients. Hence data collected through EMRs is not always useful in meeting these ends.

Purpose

In this paper we follow a community health centre (CHC), and document the changes in work practices of the personnel that were necessary in order to make EMR data useful for secondary purposes.

Methods

This project followed an action research approach, in which ethnographic data were collected mainly by participant observations, by a researcher who also acted as an IT support person for the clinic's secondary usage of EMR data. Additionally, interviews were carried out with the clinical and administrative personnel of the CHC.

Results

The case study demonstrates that meaningful use of secondary data occurs only after a long process, aimed at creating the pre-conditions for meaningful use of secondary data, has taken place.

Preconditions

Specific areas of focus have to be chosen for secondary data use, and initiatives have to be continuously evaluated and adapted to the workflow through a team approach. Collaboration between IT support and physicians is necessary to tailor the software to allow for the collection of clinically relevant data. Data entry procedures may have to be changed to encourage the usage of an agreed-upon coding scheme, required for meaningful use of secondary data. And finally resources in terms of additional personnel or dedicated time are necessary to keep up with data collection and other tasks required as a pre-condition to secondary use of data, communication of the results to the clinic, and eventual re-evaluation.

Consequences

Changes in the work practices observed in this case which were required to support secondary data use from the EMR included completion of additional tasks by clinical and administrative personnel related to the organization of follow-up tasks. Among physicians increased awareness of specific initiatives and guideline compliance in terms of chronic disease management and prevention was noticed. Finally, the clinic was able to evaluate their own practice and present the results to varied stakeholders.

Conclusions

The case describes the secondary usage of data by a clinic aimed at improving management of the clinic's patients. It illustrates that creating the pre-conditions for secondary use of data from EMRs is a complex process which can be seen as a shift in paradigms from a focus on individual patient care to chronic disease management and performance measurement. More research is needed about how to best support clinics in the process of change management necessitated by emerging clinical management goals.