Tat(48-60) peptide amino acid sequence is not unique in its cell penetrating properties and cell-surface glycosaminoglycans inhibit its cellular uptake

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Astrid Subrizi^a ; ^b ; ^{astrid.subrizi@helsinki.fi} ; Eva Tuominen^b ; Alex Bunker^a ; Tomasz Ró ; g^c ; Maxim Antopolsky^a ; Arto Urtti^a
• 关键词：Tat peptide ; Non-amphiphatic cell penetrating peptide ; Gene delivery ; Glycosaminoglycan ; Cellular barrier
• 刊名：Journal of Controlled Release
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：25_01683659
• 类别：pha
• 出版时间：10 March, 2012
• 卷：158
• 期：2
• 页码：277-285
• 文件大小：1072 K

摘要

Biomolecules and drug delivery agents, such as liposomes, are often delivered intracellularly with help of cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) and, in particular, Tat peptide. Tat peptide acts as a membrane shuttle; the structural determinants of transport and the manner by which the peptide crosses the lipid bilayer are, however, still unknown. The roles of direct membrane translocation, endocytosis and cell surface proteoglycans, in particular, remain elusive. Our study aimed to explore the relationship between structure and activity of Tat peptide and its uptake mechanism. For this purpose we introduced several modifications (e.g. lipophilic, aromatic, neutral and non-natural amino acids) into the original Tat sequence. We studied the interaction of the peptides with a model lipid membrane and with three cell lines, a phagocytic cell line (human retinal pigment epithelium cell line, ARPE-19), a non-phagocytic cell line (Chinese hamster ovary cells, CHO wt) and a mutant form of the latter cell line deficient in glycosaminoglycans chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate (CHO-pgsB 618). The amino acid residues introduced into the original sequence of Tat peptide failed to influence cellular uptake, indicating that the cationic charge alone may be responsible for translocation. Clear discrepancy between permeation activity of the peptides into cells and their interaction with lipid bilayers of liposomes indicated the limited value of the model membrane in predicting cellular peptide delivery. Cell uptake of Tat peptide was unspecific, took place either by phagocytosis or pinocytosis, and was inhibited by cell-surface glycosaminoglycans. The internalized peptides were localized in vesicles and unable to reach the cell nuclei. In conclusion, we show that Tat-related peptides enter cells on the basis of their cationic charge following different endocytosis pathways and that glycosaminoglycans on the cell surface negatively affect their uptake. This lack of specificity should be taken into account when exploiting Tat peptide as vehicle for intracellular delivery of biomacromolecules.