用户名: 密码: 验证码:
L’examen national classant (ENC) quatre années après sa mise en place : qu’en penser ?
详细信息查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
摘要
Preparation for the national entrance examination is a major concern for hospital medical students. Many teaching materials are available to prepare for the urology module: faculty photocopies and general urology texts. The objective of this study was to determine the selection criteria used by medical students to choose their urology teaching materials, in preparation for the national entrance examination.

Material and method

A questionnaire was distributed to 200 medical students (4th and 6th year students) preparing for the national entrance examination. This questionnaire comprised three parts: (1) information about the student (medical school, attendance of lectures, participation in intern conferences); (2) student's level of satisfaction with the teaching material provided;(3) criteria of choice (18 items) of the photocopies used.

Results

Out of the 200 students completing the questionnaire, only 32%used teaching material provided by the university and 22%reported that their medical school did not provide Urology teaching material. Fifty-nine percent of students thought that this teaching material was “moderately” to “not at all adapted” to the national entrance examination programme and 70%considered that they were “moderately” to “not at all” prepared for the national entrance examination. We noted that 83.5%of students thought that intern conferences were “useful” to “very useful” to prepare the urology module of the national entrance examination and 85%thought that photocopies were “useful” to “very useful” to prepare the national entrance examination. The College of urology photocopies were the most widely used teaching material: 38%of students. The four most important criteria of choices were “their peers’ opinion”, “the style of presentation and writing” and “advice from interns”. “The author” and “price” were only rated in 11th and 12th positions.

Conclusion

In this study, students appeared to consider that the material provided by medical schools was insufficient and poorly adapted to prepare for the national entrance examination in Urology. In contrast, College of urology photocopies appeared to be a satisfactory study tool, in terms of presentation and writing.


Purchase PDF (737 K)
View More Related Articles

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700