The small group subtlety of using ICT for participatory governance: A South African experience

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Hossana Twinomurinzi^a ; ^{twinoh@up.ac.za}  ; [Author Vitae] ; Jackie Phahlamohlaka^b ; ^{jphahlamohlaka@csir.co.za}  ; [Author Vitae] ; Elaine Byrne^a ; ^c ; ^{elainebyrne2@rcsi.ie}  ; [Author Vitae]
• 关键词：Participative e-governance ; E-collaboration ; Collaboration engineering ; Public service delivery ; Multi-purpose community centres ; South Africa ; Diffusion of innovations
• 刊名：Government Information Quarterly
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：34_0740624x
• 类别：soc
• 出版时间：April, 2012
• 卷：29
• 期：2
• 页码：203-211
• 文件大小：400 K

摘要

The greater number of government efforts to stimulate participative governance in communities using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) often fall short of expectations. In South Africa extending e-government to communities has been in the form of more and/or better equipped ICT-enabled community centres, called Thusong Service Centres. In this paper, based on action research experiences, we report outcomes of interpretive research into ICT-enabled approaches to participative governance in communities. Using the Diffusion of Innovations theory as an analytic lens, the findings reveal a subtlety that is not often mentioned in the call for participative e-governance; people from communities prefer to work in groups rather than individually. The collectiveness inclination is a common denominator of many developing countries where people choose to come together to leverage the few available resources. Individuals become apprehensive when made to work on their own using the ICT. The research reveals the necessity to re-design ICT to suit small groups as part of participative e-governance rather than the normative ICT design that suits individual work styles. Additionally, the research reveals that by working in groups, communities are more willing to accept the government initiatives that are being energised with the use of ICT. Methodologically, the research revealed the ethical issue that arises from action research in its raising of unrealistic expectations in a community.