流动注射分析法与分光光度法测定水中硫化物的比较

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Comparison between flow injection analysis and spectrophotometry for determination of sulfide in water 作者：丁晶娟 英文作者：Ding Jingjuan;Taixing Environmental Monitoring Station,Jiangsu Province; 关键词：流动注射分析法 ; 硫化物 ; 分光光度法 ; 方法 ; 对比分析 英文关键词：Flow injection analysis;;The sulphide;;Spectrophotometry;;Methods;;Comparison and analysis 中文刊名：NMHB 英文刊名：Environment and Development 机构：江苏省泰兴市环境监测站; 出版日期：2019-05-28 出版单位：环境与发展 年：2019 期：v.31;No.154 语种：中文; 页：NMHB201905062 页数：2 CN：05 ISSN：15-1369/X 分类号：117+119

摘要

流动注射分析法主要利用具有流速的试剂与试剂的容量测试物质。分光光度法主要通过波长判断物质属性。这两种方法都可以用来检测水中的硫化物。本文通过一定的实验方法对比两种方法检测硫化物的效果,实验结果表明流动注射分析法测定水中硫化物与分光光度法测定无明显差异,还具有精密度高、准确度高、实验效率高等优势。
        Flow injection analysis mainly USES reagents with flow rate and reagent volume test material. Spectrophotometry is mainly used to determine material properties by wavelength. Both methods can be used to detect sulfide in water. This paper compares the effectiveness of the two methods in the detection of sulfide by certain experimental methods. The experimental results show that there is no significant difference between flow injection analysis method and spectrophotometry method in the determination of sulfide in water, and it also has advantages of high precision, high accuracy and high experimental efficiency.

引文

[1]王心宇,詹未,张永,田佩瑶.饮用水中硫化物现场检测方法与实验室方法的比较[J].环境与健康杂志,2018,35(05):449-452.
    [2]敬小兰,刘亚丽.气相分子吸收光谱法测定水中硫化物的实验研究[J].环境研究与监测,2017,30(03):10-12.
    [3]王欣,邵东辉.流动注射分析法与分光光度法测定水中硫化物的比较[J].环境与发展,2016,28(02):35-39.
    [4]王玮.流动注射仪法与分光光度法在水资源中的测定[J].资源节约与环保,2013(09):62.