用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于FOCUS-PDCA构建医疗安全(不良)事件上报体系
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Establishing Medical Safety( adverse) Event Reporting System Based on FOCUS-PDCA
  • 作者:张洁 ; 倪平 ; 邓欣
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Jie;NI Ping;DENG Xin;Xiangya Hospital of Central South University;
  • 关键词:FOCUS-PDCA ; 医疗安全(不良)事件 ; 上报体系
  • 英文关键词:FOCUS-PDCA;;Medical Safety(adverse)Event;;Reporting System
  • 中文刊名:XDYU
  • 英文刊名:Modern Hospitals
  • 机构:中南大学湘雅医院;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-28
  • 出版单位:现代医院
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.19;No.198
  • 基金:中南大学湘雅医院管理研究基金(编号:2017GL18)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XDYU201904006
  • 页数:3
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:44-1534/Z
  • 分类号:21-23
摘要
目的利用FOCUS-PDCA构建员工主动报告的不良事件上报体系,为持续提升医院质量与安全提供依据。方法根据FOCUS-PDCA,找出医院不良事件上报数低的根本原因,并针对改进,采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验进行统计分析,比较D阶段前后上报情况的差异,安全文化意识的变化,同时标准化有效措施。结果 D阶段较D阶段前,不良事件季度上报数增长2. 2倍,上报情况差异有统计学意义(H=10. 9,P <0. 05);员工对不良事件管理的认可率及支持率明显提升,排斥率明显降低。结论通过"评价办牵头、多部门联动"的管理模式,优化流程、宣传培训、经济奖励、及时处理,医院构建了较为完善的医疗安全(不良)事件上报体系,助力安全生产。
        Objective To provide some basis for continuous improvement of hospital quality and safety,we use FOCUS-PDCA to establish medical safety( adverse) event reporting system. Methods By using FOCUS-PDCA,the root cause of low report numbers of hospital adverse events was found,and targeted measures was implemented. By using Kruskal-Wallis H test,we compared the differences of reporting situation and safety culture consciousness before and after the"Do stage",and standardized effective measures. Results Quarterly report numbers of adverse events in the "Do stage"increased 2. 2 times compared to the"pre-DO stage",and the difference was statistically significant( H = 10. 9,P < 0. 05).The approval rate and support rate of employees for the management of adverse events were significantly increased,while the rejection rate was significantly reduced. Conclusion Through the management mode " led by the evaluation office and coordinated by multiple departments",the hospital has established a relatively well-developed medical safety( adverse) event reporting system to facilitate the safe production by optimizing process,publicity and training,financially rewarding and timely processing.
引文
[1]张宗久.中国医院评审实务[M]. 1版.北京:人民军医出版社,2013.
    [2] THOMAS E J,STUDDERT D M,BURSTIN H R,et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado[J]. Med Care,2000,38(3):261-271.
    [3] BAKER G R,NORTON P G,FLINTOFT V,et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study:the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada[J]. CMAJ,2004,170(11):1678-1686.
    [4]程艳,颜建华,刘岩,等.医疗不良事件报告系统利用现状调查[J].中国医院管理,2014(10):41-43.
    [5] INTERNATIONAL J C. Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals(6th Edition)[M]. U. S. A:2017.
    [6]国家卫生计生委法制司.医疗质量管理办法[Z]. 2016.
    [7]高红梅,谌静,钟平,等.湖南省护理人员对护理不良事件报告认知及影响因素研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2014(23):101-106.
    [8]梁小敏,陈亭儒,周惠联.跌倒不良事件现状与影响因素分析[J].现代医院,2017,17(7):950-952.
    [9]医疗不良事件定义及分类[J].中国卫生质量管理,2014(4):28.
    [10]陆彩云,胡少华.外科护士不良事件报告认知、态度及行为意向调查分析[J].临床护理杂志,2015(2):64-66.
    [11]胡少华,李伦兰,张庆娜,等.三级甲等医院护士对不良事件报告认知与态度的影响因素分析[J].护理实践与研究,2015(9):75-78.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700