电子商务领域知识产权行政执法机制完善之建议
|
摘要
目前,传统的知识产权行政执法在电子商务领域面临执法对象数量过大、跨区域侵权、执法方式有限等困境,应当建立电子商务领域知识产权协同保护机制,发挥电子商务平台和行政机关的双重保护作用。在具体措施上,建议通过数据共享和适当介入电子商务平台治理实现直接监管、主动监管,通过设立网上专门执法机构搭建被侵权人与行政机关直接沟通的便捷平台,完善针对电子商务市场的行政执法机制,覆盖从市场准入到退出的全过程。
At present, the traditional administrative enforcement of intellectual property rights in the field of e-commerce is facing the difficulties of too large number of law enforcement objects,cross-regional infringement and limited law enforcement methods.We should establish a cooperative protection mechanism of intellectual property rights in the field of e-commerce,and give full play to the dual protection role of e-commerce platform and administrative organs.In terms of specific measures,it is suggested that direct supervision and active supervision should be achieved through data sharing and appropriate intervention in the governance of e-commerce platform.A convenient platform for direct communication between infringed persons and administrative organs should be established by setting up special law enforcement agencies on the Internet.The administrative law enforcement mechanism for e-commerce market should be improved to cover the whole process from market access to exit.
At present, the traditional administrative enforcement of intellectual property rights in the field of e-commerce is facing the difficulties of too large number of law enforcement objects,cross-regional infringement and limited law enforcement methods.We should establish a cooperative protection mechanism of intellectual property rights in the field of e-commerce,and give full play to the dual protection role of e-commerce platform and administrative organs.In terms of specific measures,it is suggested that direct supervision and active supervision should be achieved through data sharing and appropriate intervention in the governance of e-commerce platform.A convenient platform for direct communication between infringed persons and administrative organs should be established by setting up special law enforcement agencies on the Internet.The administrative law enforcement mechanism for e-commerce market should be improved to cover the whole process from market access to exit.
引文
[1]贺宁馨,肖尤丹.促进电子商务知识产权保护的战略思考---基于行政管理的视角[J].中国科学院院刊,2014,(6):678-680.
[2][12]2018阿里巴巴知识产权保护年度报告[OL].http://sh.qihoo.com/pc/97133917fecb71c80?cota=3&sign=360_e39369d1&refer_scene=so_1.2019-01-11.
[3]刘斌,陶丽琴,洪积庆.电子商务领域知识产权保障机制研究[J].知识产权,2015,(2):67.
[4]张鑫淼.电子商务平台的知识产权保护问题研究[D].沈阳:沈阳工业大学硕士学位论文,2018.
[5][20]胡晓景.电子商务领域知识产权保护的调查与思考---以义乌市为例[J].公安学刊(浙江警察学院学报),2017,(6):34-38.
[6]冀瑜,邢雁发,洪积庆等.电子商务市场知识产权保护的制度缺失及其对策[J].知识产权,2014,(6):61.
[7]Ernest T.Patrikis;Stephanie Heller.The Government's Role in Electronic Commerce:A Review of the Clinton Administration's Framework on Global Electronic Commerce,18 Ann.Rev.Banking L.325(1999):327.
[8]张弘.作为私权担保性质的行政法---兼及对行政法理论基础的反思与重构[J].北方法学,2015,(1):96-100.
[9]王春业.论行政权、私权融合与行政法学研究的变革[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2008,(4):52-54.
[10]E.Glen Weyl&Alexander White.Let the Right"One"Win:Policy Lessons from the New Economics of Platforms.Competition Policy International.Autumn,2014.10 Competition Pol'y Int'l 28.
[11]Michele Ferrante,China's Renewed Attention to the Fight against Counterfeit Products Sold Online:The Impact of Taobao's New Policy and Punishments,JOURNAL OF INTERNET LAW,2015-7:4
[13]杨秋菊,罗月领.社会信用建设中的政府作用:国际经验和国内探索---基于上海、浙江、黑龙江和贵州的实证分析[J].征信,2015,(1):18-21.
[14]李婧.欧盟银行业单一监管机制及其对中国的借鉴[J].现代经济探讨,2015(11):88-90.
[15]潘金生等.中国信用制度建设[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003:335-339.
[16]华树常.美欧日电商领域知识产权保护实践经验与启示[J].金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版),2016,(12):31-33.
[17]徐楠轩.电子商务领域专利保护协作机制的构建---基于对阿里巴巴集团的调研[J].科技管理研究,2015,(2):123.
[18]费艳颖等.东北4省(区)知识产权行政执法协作的困境及对策---以大数据云计算为背景[J].科学管理研究,2018,(2):58.
[19]崔立红,刘德旺.大数据时代我国知识产权管理与保护的变革[J].知识产权,2016,(11):89.
[21]苏冬冬.电子商务领域专利侵权治理的困境与出路研究---基于浙江的实证分析[J].科技与法律,2018,(5):52.
[2][12]2018阿里巴巴知识产权保护年度报告[OL].http://sh.qihoo.com/pc/97133917fecb71c80?cota=3&sign=360_e39369d1&refer_scene=so_1.2019-01-11.
[3]刘斌,陶丽琴,洪积庆.电子商务领域知识产权保障机制研究[J].知识产权,2015,(2):67.
[4]张鑫淼.电子商务平台的知识产权保护问题研究[D].沈阳:沈阳工业大学硕士学位论文,2018.
[5][20]胡晓景.电子商务领域知识产权保护的调查与思考---以义乌市为例[J].公安学刊(浙江警察学院学报),2017,(6):34-38.
[6]冀瑜,邢雁发,洪积庆等.电子商务市场知识产权保护的制度缺失及其对策[J].知识产权,2014,(6):61.
[7]Ernest T.Patrikis;Stephanie Heller.The Government's Role in Electronic Commerce:A Review of the Clinton Administration's Framework on Global Electronic Commerce,18 Ann.Rev.Banking L.325(1999):327.
[8]张弘.作为私权担保性质的行政法---兼及对行政法理论基础的反思与重构[J].北方法学,2015,(1):96-100.
[9]王春业.论行政权、私权融合与行政法学研究的变革[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2008,(4):52-54.
[10]E.Glen Weyl&Alexander White.Let the Right"One"Win:Policy Lessons from the New Economics of Platforms.Competition Policy International.Autumn,2014.10 Competition Pol'y Int'l 28.
[11]Michele Ferrante,China's Renewed Attention to the Fight against Counterfeit Products Sold Online:The Impact of Taobao's New Policy and Punishments,JOURNAL OF INTERNET LAW,2015-7:4
[13]杨秋菊,罗月领.社会信用建设中的政府作用:国际经验和国内探索---基于上海、浙江、黑龙江和贵州的实证分析[J].征信,2015,(1):18-21.
[14]李婧.欧盟银行业单一监管机制及其对中国的借鉴[J].现代经济探讨,2015(11):88-90.
[15]潘金生等.中国信用制度建设[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003:335-339.
[16]华树常.美欧日电商领域知识产权保护实践经验与启示[J].金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版),2016,(12):31-33.
[17]徐楠轩.电子商务领域专利保护协作机制的构建---基于对阿里巴巴集团的调研[J].科技管理研究,2015,(2):123.
[18]费艳颖等.东北4省(区)知识产权行政执法协作的困境及对策---以大数据云计算为背景[J].科学管理研究,2018,(2):58.
[19]崔立红,刘德旺.大数据时代我国知识产权管理与保护的变革[J].知识产权,2016,(11):89.
[21]苏冬冬.电子商务领域专利侵权治理的困境与出路研究---基于浙江的实证分析[J].科技与法律,2018,(5):52.