用户名: 密码: 验证码:
呼吸内科护理中重症患者的临床护理效果及探究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Clinical Nursing Effect and ExPloration of Severe and Severe Patients in ResPiratory Internal Medicine Nursing
  • 作者:吴爱青 ; 郭贵玲
  • 英文作者:Wu Ai-qing;Guo Gui-ling;Liaocheng PeoPle's HosPital;
  • 关键词:呼吸内科 ; 重症患者 ; 临床护理效果
  • 英文关键词:ResPiratory medicine;;Severe Patients;;Clinical nursing effect
  • 中文刊名:SLHL
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Clinic Nursing's Practicality
  • 机构:山东省聊城市人民医院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-27
  • 出版单位:实用临床护理学电子杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.4
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SLHL201909007
  • 页数:2
  • CN:09
  • ISSN:11-9369/R
  • 分类号:20+24
摘要
目的对采取传统护理方式和优化改进方式应用在呼吸内科重症患者临床效果的深层次分析。方法通过对2016年6月到2017年6月之间呼吸内科的共计70例患者进行选取,而这70例患者又具体拆分为女性患者42例,男性患者48例,患者年龄在24-65岁之间,平均年龄(42.63±5.69)岁,发病时间均在2-10年之间,通过对患者采取不同方式的护理然后对造成的临床效果深入研究。将共计70例患者分为对照组和观察组,分组方式则完全随机,每组由35例患者构成,其中对照组有19例男性患者,16例女性患者,由较多女性患者共计20例和比例较少的15例男性患者构成了观察组。对观察组重症患者采取基本性的护理方式,而对于观察组患者选择重症患者加强型的临床护理干预,并对俩组患者不同护理结果的相关数据进行比对分析。结果 8.6%是被分在观察组所有重症患者并发症的综合发生率,仅有3例患者发生并发症现象;而在对照组有10名患者发生并发症,并发症的发生率高达28.6%。结论将具有明显差别的护理方式应用于所有参与研究的重症患者护理过程中,得出临床护理效果方面优化改进干预护理方式更胜一筹的结果。P<0.05,分组对比的数据都符合统计学意义。
        objective to analyze the clinical effects of traditional nursing methods and oPtimization methods in Patients with severe resPiratory diseases. Method through June 2016 to June 2017 resPiratory medicine between a total of70 Patients were selected, and that 70 Patients and 42 Patients with concrete sPlit for women, men with 48 cases, Patients aged between 24-65, average age(42.63 + 5.69), the onset time between 2 to 10 years, through different ways of nursing on the Patients and to cause the clinical effect of in-dePth study. A total of 70 Patients were divided into control grouP and observation grouP, comPletely random grouPing, each grouP consists of 35 Patients, 19 cases of male Patients of control grouP, 16 cases of female Patients, by a total of 20 Patients with more women and less ProPortion of 15 Patients with male make uP the grouP.The observation grouP of Patients with severe fundamental nursing ways, and to choose intensive observation grouP Patients enhanced clinical nursing intervention, and the results of two grouPs of Patients with different nursing related data for analysis.Results 8.6% was the comPrehensive incidence of comPlications of all severe Patients in the observation grouP, and only 3 Patients had comPlications. In the control grouP, there were 10 Patients with comPlications, and the incidence of comPlications was 28.6%. Conclusion the aPPlication of the nursing mode of has obvious difference in the critically ill Patient care all involved in the research Process, it is concluded that clinical nursing effect on the result of oPtimization to imProve the way of intervention nursing better. P<0.05, the data of grouP comParison was statistically signi? cant.
引文
[1]袁伟蓉,朱淑平,林日霞.呼吸内科重症患者的临床护理方法及其效果观察[J].中国医药科学,2017,7(19):117-119.
    [2]范晓辉.探讨呼吸内科重症患者的临床护理方法及其效果[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(48):277-278.
    [3]杨福兵.呼吸内科护理中重症患者的护理效果观察[J].中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(06):212-213.
    [4]黄冬凤,杨红霞,傅贵平.呼吸内科护理中重症患者的临床护理探讨[J].当代医学,2014,20(22):90-91.
    [5]董颖.呼吸内科护理中重症患者的护理效果观察[J].心血管病防治知识(学术版),2014(02):112-113.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700