摘要
以青岛地铁1号线人民广场站—衡山路站区间站前折返线为例,采用三维数值模拟方法分析了初期支护拱盖法分步开挖过程中地面沉降、拱顶沉降、初期支护受力和围岩应变的变化规律,进一步分析硬岩地层中扁平大跨隧道施工二次衬砌拱盖法优化为初期支护拱盖法的可行性,并通过现场监测结果加以验证。研究结果表明:硬岩地层中扁平大跨隧道采用初期支护拱盖法施工地面沉降、拱顶沉降、初期支护和围岩的应变满足规范要求,二次初砌拱盖法优化为初期支护拱盖法切实可行;拆撑是初期支护拱盖法开挖工序中的重要阶段,确定合理的拆撑长度是该工法成功应用的关键。
Taking People's Square Station-Hengshan Road Station of Qingdao Metro Line 1 as an example,the variation laws of ground settlement,vault settlement,primary support force and surrounding rock strain of primary support archcover method during step-by-step excavation process were analyzed by using three-dimensional numerical simulation method.The feasibility of primary supports arch-cover method optimizing from secondary lining arch-cover method in the flat large-span tunnel construction in hard rock stratum was further analyzed and verif ied by the field monitoring results.The research results show that in hard rock stratum,the ground settlement,vault settlement,primary support and strain of surrounding rock of flat large-span tunnel constructed by primary support arch-cover method should meet the requirements of the code,it is feasible to optimize the secondary lining arch-cover method to the primary support archcover method. Bracing removal is an important stage in the excavation process with the primary support arch-cover method,and the key to the successful application of this method is to determine the reasonable length of the bracing removal.
引文
[1]张光权,杜子建,宋锦泉,等.地铁车站拱盖法施工沉降监测分析及控制对策[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(增1):3413-3420.
[2]孙捷城,吕显州,秦志斌,等.浅埋碎裂岩层地铁车站拱盖-桩锚组合施工工法[J].铁道建筑,2015,55(7):72-77.
[3]王梦恕.地下工程浅埋暗挖技术通论[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,2005.
[4]吕波.暗挖地铁车站拱盖法关键施工技术[J].现代隧道技术,2014,1(3):181-187.
[5]吴学峰.土岩复合地层拱盖法施工三维有限元数值模拟[J].城市轨道交通研究,2012(8):135-138.
[6]张世杰.岩层地铁车站初支拱盖法开挖力学效应与适用性研究[D].济南:山东大学,2017.
[7]李宁宁,杜虎.土岩组合地层中拱盖法地铁车站工法优化研究[J].国防交通工程与技术,2017(4):27-31.
[8]午向阳,蒋宗全,李鹏飞,等.大断面隧道下穿高速公路施工方案优化研究[J].铁道建筑,2010,50(11):40-42.
[9]管振祥.扁坦大跨隧道施工过程的三维数值模拟[J].铁道建筑,2008,48(8):64-66.
[10]刘涛,赵松壮,孙付峰.上软下硬地层浅埋大跨度车站拆撑安全性分析[J].岩土力学,2014,35(增1):306-310.