数字化代际冲突:概念、特征及成因
|
摘要
随着我国互联网普及率的逐年攀升,中国社会的数字代沟正加速演变成数字化代际冲突。较之于数字代沟,数字化代际冲突在内涵定义、主体指涉和结构强度上都存在着明显不同。数字化代际冲突还具有冲突内容涉网化、冲突方式媒介化和冲突扩散情感化等三个方面的特征。我国网络社会的压缩式发展、新媒体传播的"流量逻辑",以及网民群体的结构性失衡,成了数字化代际冲突产生的主要原因。为化解这一新型矛盾,当前的理论研究应再次聚焦世代视角,并需要在治理对策上坚持"线上+线下"的联动性治理、"市场+政府+社会"的协同性治理以及"对话+行动"的情感性治理。
With the increasing popularity of internet in China, the digital gap in Chinese society is accelerating to evolve into a digital intergenerational conflict. Compared with the digital gap, there are obvious differences in the connotation definition, the subject reference and the structural strength of the digital intergenerational conflict.At the same time, the digital intergenerational conflict also has three characteristics: the conflict content is involved in the network, the conflict mode is by media, and the conflict is expressed emotionally. The compressing development of China's network society, the "flow" logic of the new media and the structural imbalances of the netizens have become the main reasons for the emergence of the digital intergenerational conflict. In order to resolve this new contradiction, the current theoretical research should focus on the perspective of generation again,and should adhere to the synergistic governance of "online + offline", the synergistic governance of "market +government + society" and the emotional governance of "dialogue + action".
With the increasing popularity of internet in China, the digital gap in Chinese society is accelerating to evolve into a digital intergenerational conflict. Compared with the digital gap, there are obvious differences in the connotation definition, the subject reference and the structural strength of the digital intergenerational conflict.At the same time, the digital intergenerational conflict also has three characteristics: the conflict content is involved in the network, the conflict mode is by media, and the conflict is expressed emotionally. The compressing development of China's network society, the "flow" logic of the new media and the structural imbalances of the netizens have become the main reasons for the emergence of the digital intergenerational conflict. In order to resolve this new contradiction, the current theoretical research should focus on the perspective of generation again,and should adhere to the synergistic governance of "online + offline", the synergistic governance of "market +government + society" and the emotional governance of "dialogue + action".
引文
[1][26]周晓虹.文化反哺与器物文明的代际传承[J].中国社会科学,2011(06):116-118.
[2]周裕琼.数字代沟与文化反哺:对家庭内“静悄悄的革命”的量化考察[J].现代传播,2014(02):117-123.
[3][11]林枫、周裕琼、李博.同一个家庭不同的微信:大学生VS父母的数字代沟研究[J].新闻大学,2017(03):99-106,151.
[4]周晓虹.中国青年的历史蜕变:国家与社会关系的视角[J].江苏社会科学,2015(06):71-78.
[5]许身健.化解代际冲突的六个关键词[N].检察日报,2017-07-12(007).
[6]Carolyn Cartier,Manuel Castells,Jack Linchuan Qiu.The Information Have-Less:Inequality,Mobility,and Translocal Networks in Chinese Cities,Studies in Comparative International Development,2005(02):9-34.
[7]王金玲.中国城市家庭冲突缘起新特点[J].浙江学刊,1990(06):147-148.
[8]卢利林.社会转型时期消费代际冲突探析[J].中国青年研究,2006(01):5-8.
[9]中国互联网络信息中心.2013年中国网络购物市场研究报告[EB/OL].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/201409/P020140901332431510284.pdf,2013.
[10]腾讯科技.2016微信数据报告[EB/OL].http://tech.qq.com/a/20161228/018057.htm#p=1,2016.
[12]彭飞.为亲情拓展对话空间.人民日报[N].2018-02-01(005).
[13][17]杨国斌.连线力:中国网民在行动[M].邓燕华译,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2013:259,36-37.
[14]吴小英.代际冲突与青年话语的变迁[J].青年研究,2006(08):1-8.
[15][18]中国互联网络信息中心.第43次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201902/P020190318523029756345.pdf,2019.
[16]Mary Bergstrom.All Eyes East:Lessons from the Front Lines of Marketing toChina's Youth.New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2012:25.
[19]中国互联网络信息中心.2015年中国社交应用用户行为研究报告[EB/OL].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/sqbg/201604/P020160722551429454480.pdf,2015.
[20]周晓虹.文化反哺与媒介影响的代际差异[J].江苏行政学院学报,2016(02):63-70.
[21]陈秋心、胡泳.宣传逻辑与市场逻辑--新媒体时代中国新闻伦理的两难困境[J].二十一世纪,2016(01):14.
[22]Roy Huijsmans(ed).Generationing Development:A Relational Approach to Children,Youth and Development,London:Palgrave Macmillan,2016:322.
[23]Arthur Kleinman,Yunxiang Yan et al.Deep China:The Moral Life of the Person,Berkeley:University of California Press,2011:19.
[24]陈映芳.在角色与非角色之间--中国的青年文化[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2002:37-39.
[25]王晓真.韩国代际冲突日趋加重[N].中国社会科学报,2016-08-24(003).
[2]周裕琼.数字代沟与文化反哺:对家庭内“静悄悄的革命”的量化考察[J].现代传播,2014(02):117-123.
[3][11]林枫、周裕琼、李博.同一个家庭不同的微信:大学生VS父母的数字代沟研究[J].新闻大学,2017(03):99-106,151.
[4]周晓虹.中国青年的历史蜕变:国家与社会关系的视角[J].江苏社会科学,2015(06):71-78.
[5]许身健.化解代际冲突的六个关键词[N].检察日报,2017-07-12(007).
[6]Carolyn Cartier,Manuel Castells,Jack Linchuan Qiu.The Information Have-Less:Inequality,Mobility,and Translocal Networks in Chinese Cities,Studies in Comparative International Development,2005(02):9-34.
[7]王金玲.中国城市家庭冲突缘起新特点[J].浙江学刊,1990(06):147-148.
[8]卢利林.社会转型时期消费代际冲突探析[J].中国青年研究,2006(01):5-8.
[9]中国互联网络信息中心.2013年中国网络购物市场研究报告[EB/OL].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/201409/P020140901332431510284.pdf,2013.
[10]腾讯科技.2016微信数据报告[EB/OL].http://tech.qq.com/a/20161228/018057.htm#p=1,2016.
[12]彭飞.为亲情拓展对话空间.人民日报[N].2018-02-01(005).
[13][17]杨国斌.连线力:中国网民在行动[M].邓燕华译,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2013:259,36-37.
[14]吴小英.代际冲突与青年话语的变迁[J].青年研究,2006(08):1-8.
[15][18]中国互联网络信息中心.第43次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201902/P020190318523029756345.pdf,2019.
[16]Mary Bergstrom.All Eyes East:Lessons from the Front Lines of Marketing toChina's Youth.New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2012:25.
[19]中国互联网络信息中心.2015年中国社交应用用户行为研究报告[EB/OL].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/sqbg/201604/P020160722551429454480.pdf,2015.
[20]周晓虹.文化反哺与媒介影响的代际差异[J].江苏行政学院学报,2016(02):63-70.
[21]陈秋心、胡泳.宣传逻辑与市场逻辑--新媒体时代中国新闻伦理的两难困境[J].二十一世纪,2016(01):14.
[22]Roy Huijsmans(ed).Generationing Development:A Relational Approach to Children,Youth and Development,London:Palgrave Macmillan,2016:322.
[23]Arthur Kleinman,Yunxiang Yan et al.Deep China:The Moral Life of the Person,Berkeley:University of California Press,2011:19.
[24]陈映芳.在角色与非角色之间--中国的青年文化[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2002:37-39.
[25]王晓真.韩国代际冲突日趋加重[N].中国社会科学报,2016-08-24(003).