整体性治理理念下的文化生态保护区建设研究——以晋中国家级文化生态保护试验区为例
|
摘要
文化生态保护区作为非物质文化遗产整体性保护的创新举措,实现了从传统单一项目、单一形态的保护向多文化表现形式融合发展的综合性保护的转变,成为现阶段我国非物质文化遗产整体性保护的主要实践方式。基于整体性治理理念,在探索和遵循文化生态治理规律的基础上构建动态多主体网络保护结构,发挥保护主体的能动性和创造性;通过以文化形态整体性保护为导向的协调机制与以信任为核心要素的多维整合机制的构建,提升文化生态保护能力,实现非物质文化遗产乃至文化生态的可持续发展是文化生态保护区建设的未来选择。
As an innovative measure of the integrated protection of intangible cultural heritage,the eco-cultural conservation area has achieved the transformation from the traditional single project and the single form of protection to the comprehensive protection of the integration of multi-cultural forms of expression. It has become the main practical way to protect the intangible cultural heritage in our country in the contemporary era. In the future,based on the concept of holistic governance and on the basis of exploring and following the regular patterns of the eco-cultural governance,the dynamic multi-agent network protection structure should be constructed to give full play to the initiative and creativity of the protectors. And then through the construction of the coordination mechanism guided by the holistic protection of cultural form and the multi-dimensional integration mechanism with trust as the core element,it is the best choice of the construction of the eco-cultural conservation area to enhance the ability of ecocultural protection and realize the sustainable development of intangible cultural heritage and eco-culture.
As an innovative measure of the integrated protection of intangible cultural heritage,the eco-cultural conservation area has achieved the transformation from the traditional single project and the single form of protection to the comprehensive protection of the integration of multi-cultural forms of expression. It has become the main practical way to protect the intangible cultural heritage in our country in the contemporary era. In the future,based on the concept of holistic governance and on the basis of exploring and following the regular patterns of the eco-cultural governance,the dynamic multi-agent network protection structure should be constructed to give full play to the initiative and creativity of the protectors. And then through the construction of the coordination mechanism guided by the holistic protection of cultural form and the multi-dimensional integration mechanism with trust as the core element,it is the best choice of the construction of the eco-cultural conservation area to enhance the ability of ecocultural protection and realize the sustainable development of intangible cultural heritage and eco-culture.
引文
[1]刘魁立.非物质文化遗产及其保护的整体性原则[J].广西师范学院学报,2004(4):1-8.
[2]赵艳喜.论非物质文化遗产的整体性保护理念[J].贵州民族研究,2009,29(6):49-53.
[3]王巨山,夏晓晨.整体性原则与非物质文化遗产保护[J].民族艺术研究,2011,24(3):5-8.
[4]赵艳喜.整体性保护、区域性整体保护与文化生态保护区的建设[J].河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,31(4):20-23+27.
[5]李山岗,仇兵奎.国家级文化生态保护区:如何管理与评价[N].光明日报,2016-12-02(005).
[6]刘魁立.文化生态保护区问题刍议[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007(3):9-12.
[7]所萌.区域视角下的非物质文化遗产整体性保护方式研究——以迪庆民族文化生态保护区为例[J].城市发展研究,2014,21(7):18-23.
[8]胡佳.迈向整体性治理:政府改革的整体性策略及在中国的适用性[J].南京社会科学,2010(5):46-51.
[9]曾凡军.基于整体性治理的政府组织协调机制研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2010.
[10]竺乾威.从新公共管理到整体性治理[J].中国行政管理,2008(10):52-58.
[11]胡象明,唐波勇.整体性治理:公共管理的新范式[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010,49(1):11-15.
[12]韩瑞波.整体性治理在国家治理中的适用性分析:一个文献综述[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2016,37(6):67-73.
[13]方李莉.文化生态失衡问题的提出[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001(3):105-113.
[2]赵艳喜.论非物质文化遗产的整体性保护理念[J].贵州民族研究,2009,29(6):49-53.
[3]王巨山,夏晓晨.整体性原则与非物质文化遗产保护[J].民族艺术研究,2011,24(3):5-8.
[4]赵艳喜.整体性保护、区域性整体保护与文化生态保护区的建设[J].河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,31(4):20-23+27.
[5]李山岗,仇兵奎.国家级文化生态保护区:如何管理与评价[N].光明日报,2016-12-02(005).
[6]刘魁立.文化生态保护区问题刍议[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007(3):9-12.
[7]所萌.区域视角下的非物质文化遗产整体性保护方式研究——以迪庆民族文化生态保护区为例[J].城市发展研究,2014,21(7):18-23.
[8]胡佳.迈向整体性治理:政府改革的整体性策略及在中国的适用性[J].南京社会科学,2010(5):46-51.
[9]曾凡军.基于整体性治理的政府组织协调机制研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2010.
[10]竺乾威.从新公共管理到整体性治理[J].中国行政管理,2008(10):52-58.
[11]胡象明,唐波勇.整体性治理:公共管理的新范式[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010,49(1):11-15.
[12]韩瑞波.整体性治理在国家治理中的适用性分析:一个文献综述[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2016,37(6):67-73.
[13]方李莉.文化生态失衡问题的提出[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2001(3):105-113.