用户名: 密码: 验证码:
非正式制度、环境规制对农户绿色生产行为的影响——基于湖北1105份农户调查数据
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Impact of informal institutions and environmental regulations on farmers' green production behavior:Based on survey data of 1105 households in Hubei Province
  • 作者:李芬妮 ; 张俊飚 ; 何可
  • 英文作者:LI Fenni;ZHANG Junbiao;HE Ke;College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University;Hubei Rural Development Research Center;
  • 关键词:制度失灵 ; 非正式制度 ; 环境规制 ; 农户绿色生产行为 ; 多变量Probit ; 湖北省
  • 英文关键词:institutional failure;;informal institutions;;environmental regulations;;farmers' green production behavior;;multivariate probit model;;Hubei Province
  • 中文刊名:ZRZY
  • 英文刊名:Resources Science
  • 机构:华中农业大学经济管理学院;湖北农村发展研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-07-25
  • 出版单位:资源科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.41
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(71703051);; 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2662017QD009);; 教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目(15JZD014)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZRZY201907004
  • 页数:13
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:11-3868/N
  • 分类号:41-53
摘要
依靠非正式制度与环境规制规范农户生产行为,对于推动农业绿色转型和实现农业可持续发展具有重要意义。本文以少耕免耕技术、有机肥施用技术和秸秆还田技术为例,构建多变量Probit模型,利用湖北省1105份农户调研数据,分析了非正式制度、环境规制对农户绿色生产行为的影响。研究发现:①非正式制度和环境规制对农户绿色生产行为均存在促进作用,非正式制度中的价值导向、惩戒监督和传递内化可促进农户的绿色生产行为,而环境规制中的引导规制和激励规制对农户绿色生产行为亦具有积极作用。②环境规制中的约束规制未通过显著性检验,表明当前环境规制存在"相对性制度失灵"现象,在约束农户生产行为方面效果欠佳。③非正式制度与环境规制对农户绿色生产行为存在一定的交互影响,非正式制度可作为环境规制的替代机制,推动农户参与绿色生产行为。基于此,本文认为,非正式制度在推动农户绿色生产行为中未能得到足够重视,是导致环境规制陷入"相对性制度失灵"的重要原因,今后,既要继续加强环境规制在农民绿色生产中的作用,更要培育非正式制度,构建非正式制度与正式制度相互支撑、相互融合的互动机制,从而为诱导和推进农户绿色生产行为创造软硬结合的规制体系。
        Relying on informal institutions and environmental regulations to regulate farmers' green production behavior is of great significance for promoting the green transformation of agriculture and realizing agricultural sustainable development. Taking no tillage technology,organic fertilizer application technology, and"straw return to soil"technology as an example,based on the survey data of 1105 farming households in Hubei Province, and by constructing a multivariate probit model, this study analyzed the impact of informal institutions and environmental regulations on farmers' green production behavior. The result shows that:(1)Informal institutions and environmental regulations play a significant role in promoting farmers' green production behavior. Informal institutions promote farmers' green production behavior through developing a new value system, monitoring and penalty, and dissemination and internalization. Environmental regulations promote farmers' green production behavior through guidance-oriented regulation and incentive-focused regulation.(2) Prohibitive regulation in environmental regulations did not passed the significance test, which indicates "relative institutional failure" of current environmental regulations in restraining farmers' production behavior.(3) Informal institutions and environmental regulations have certain interactive effects on farmers' green production behavior. Informal institutions can be used as a substitute mechanism for environmental regulations to promote farmers' participation in green production. We argue that the reason that environmental regulations show "relative institutional failure"is that informal institutions have not been given enough attention. In the future, we should not only continue to strengthen the role of environmental regulations in green production of rural households, but also cultivate informal institutions, and induce the formation of an impact mechanism in which informal institutions and environmental regulations mutually support and supplement each other.
引文
[1]杜焱强,刘平养,包存宽,等.社会资本视阈下的农村环境治理研究:以欠发达地区J村养殖污染为个案[J].公共管理学报,2016,13(4):101-112.[Du Y Q,Liu P Y,Bao C K,et al.A study on the rural environmental governance through the lens of social capital:A case of livestock farming pollution in the undeveloped region[J].Journal of Public Management,2016,13(4):101-112.]
    [2]曹海林.农村水环境保护:监管困境及新行动策略建构[J].社会科学研究,2010,(6):113-118.[Cao H L.Rural water environment protection:Supervision dilemma and construction of new action strategies[J].Social Science Research,2010,(6):113-118.]
    [3]黄祖辉,钟颖琦,王晓莉.不同政策对农户农药施用行为的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(8):148-155.[Huang ZH,Zhong Y Q,Wang X L.Study on the impacts of government policy on farmers’pesticide application behavior[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2016,26(8):148-155.]
    [4]徐志刚,张炯,仇焕广.声誉诉求对农户亲环境行为的影响研究:以家禽养殖户污染物处理方式选择为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(10):44-52.[Xu Z G,Zhang J,Qiu H G.Effects of reputation demands on farmers’pro-environmental behavior:Taking the farmers’disposal behavior of poultry waste as an example[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2016,26(10):44-52.]
    [5]胡珺,宋献中,王红建.非正式制度、家乡认同与企业环境治理[J].管理世界,2017(3):76-94.[Hu J,Song X Z,Wang H J.Informal institution,hometown identity and corporate environmental governance[J].Management World,2017(3):76-94.]
    [6]North D C.Institutional Change and Economic Performance[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
    [7]林毅夫.关于制度变迁的经济学理论:诱致性变迁与强制性变迁[A].罗纳德·H·科斯,阿尔钦,诺斯,等.财产权利与制度变迁[C].上海:上海人民出版社,1994.[Lin Y F.The Economic Theory of Institutional Changes:The Induced Changes and the Enforced Changes[A].Coase R H,Alchain A,North D,et al.Property Rights and Institutional Changes[C].Shanghai:Shanghai People’s Publishing House,1994.]
    [8]Hu B L.Informal Institutions and Rural Development in China[M].London:Routledge,2007.
    [9]High C,Pelling M,Nemes G.Understanding informal institutions:Networks and communities in rural development[J].Open Research Online,2005,(1):1-19.
    [10]刘昂.乡村治理制度的伦理思考:基于江苏省徐州市JN村的田野调查[J].中国农村观察,2018,(3):65-74.[Liu A.Ethical thoughts on rural governance system:An analysis based on fieldwork in JN Village,Xuzhou City,Jiangsu Province[J].China Rural Survey,2018,(3):65-74.]
    [11]郭利京,赵瑾.非正式制度与农户亲环境行为:以农户秸秆处理行为为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(11):69-75.[Guo L J,Zhao J.Informal institutions and farmers pro-environmental behavior:As an example of the farmers’straw processing behavior[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2014,24(11):69-75.]
    [12]温莹莹.非正式制度与村庄公共物品供给:T村个案研究[J].社会学研究,2013,(1):113-133.[Wen Y Y.Informal institution and public goods provision in rural China:A case study of T Village[J].Sociological Studies,2013,(1):113-133.]
    [13]郭清卉,李世平,李昊.基于社会规范视角的农户化肥减量化措施采纳行为研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(10):50-55.[Guo Q H,Li S P,Li H.Adoption behaviors of farmers’chemical fertilizer reduction measures based on the perspective of social norms[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2018,32(10):50-55.]
    [14]李学荣,张利国.农户清洁生产技术采纳意愿及影响因素的实证分析[J].农业现代化研究,2019,40(2):299-307.[Li X R,Zhang L G.Empirical analysis on farmers’willingness to adopt cleaner production technologies and its influencing factors[J].Research of Agricultural Modernization,2019,40(2):299-307.]
    [15]Lamichhane J R.Pesticide use and risk reduction in European farming systems with IPM:An introduction to the special issue[J].Crop Protection,2017,97:1-6.
    [16]林丽梅,刘振滨,杜焱强,等.生猪规模养殖户污染防治行为的心理认知及环境规制影响效应[J].中国生态农业学报,2018,26(1):156-166.[Lin L M,Liu Z B,Du Y Q,et al.Psychological cognition of pollution prevention of family-oriented scale pig breeders and environmental regulation influence effects[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2018,26(1):156-166.]
    [17]Spraggon J.Exogenous targeting instruments as a solution to group moral hazards[J].Journal of Public Economics,2002,84(3):427-456.
    [18]Lichtenberg E.Economics of pesticide use and regulation[J].Encyclopedia of Energy Natural Resource&Environmental Economics,2013,3:86-97.
    [19]潘丹,孔凡斌.养殖户环境友好型畜禽粪便处理方式选择行为分析:以生猪养殖为例[J].中国农村经济,2015,(9):17-29.[Pan D,Kong F B.Environmentally friendly way choice behavior analysis of farmers:Based on pigs breeding[J].Chinese Rural Economy,2015,(9):17-29.]
    [20]周家明.乡村治理中村规民约的作用机制研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2015.[Zhou J M.Study on the Function Mechanism of Village Regulations and Rules in the Rural Management[D].Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University,2015.]
    [21]马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会[M].林荣远,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.[Weber M.Economy and Society[M].Lin R Y Trans..Beijing:The Commercial Press,1997.]
    [22]Helmke G,Levitsky S.Informal institutions and comparative politics:A research agenda[J].Perspectives on Politics,2004,2(4):725-740.
    [23]Pigou A C.The Economics of Welfare[M].London:Macmillan,1932.
    [24]Coase R H.The Problem of Social Cost[A].Gopalakrishnan C.Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics[C].London:Macmillan Press,1960.
    [25]于潇.环境规制政策的作用机理与变迁实践分析:基于1978-2016年环境规制政策演进的考察[J].中国科技论坛,2017,(12):15-24.[Yu X.The mechanism of environmental regulation policy and its practice changes:Based on the evolution of environmental regulation policy from 1978 to 2016[J].Forum on Science and Technology in China,2017,(12):15-24.]
    [26]朱红根,葛继红.政府规制对农业企业绿色创业影响的理论与实证:以江西省农业龙头企业为例[J].华东经济管理,2018,32(11):30-36.[Zhu H G,Ge J H.A theoretical and empirical analysis on the impact of government regulation on green entrepreneurship of agricultural enterprises:A case of agricultural leading enterprises in Jiangxi Province[J].East China Economic Management,2018,32(11):30-36.]
    [27]黄炜虹,齐振宏,邬兰娅,等.农户从事生态循环农业意愿与行为的决定:市场收益还是政策激励?[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(8):69-77.[Huang W H,Qi Z H,Wu L Y,et al.Determinants of farmers’willingness and behavior to engage in ecological circular agriculture:Market returns or policy incentives?[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2017,27(8):69-77.]
    [28]湖北省统计局.湖北统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2017.[Hubei Provincial Bureau of Statistics.Hubei Statistical Yearbook[M].Beijing:China Statistics Press,2017.]
    [29]Mittal S,Mehar M.Socio-economic factors affecting adoption of modern information and communication technology by farmers in India:Analysis using Multivariate Probit model[J].The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension,2016,22(2):199-212.
    [30]UNEP.Towards a Green Economy:Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication[R].Nairobi:United Nations Environment Programme,2011.
    [31]吴雪莲,张俊飚,何可,等.农户水稻秸秆还田技术采纳意愿及其驱动路径分析[J].资源科学,2016,38(11):2117-2126.[Wu XL,Zhang J B,He K,et al.Farmer willingness to adopt rice straw returning technology and driving path[J].Resources Science,2016,38(11):2117-2126.]
    [32]李卫,薛彩霞,姚顺波,等.保护性耕作技术、种植制度与土地生产率:来自黄土高原农户的证据[J].资源科学,2017,39(7):1259-1271.[Li W,Xue C X,Yao S B,et al.Conservation tillage,cropping systems and land productivity for households on the Loess Plateau[J].Resources Science,2017,39(7):1259-1271.]
    [33]余威震,罗小锋,李容容,等.绿色认知视角下农户绿色技术采纳意愿与行为悖离研究[J].资源科学,2017,39(8):1573-1583.[Yu W Z,Luo X F,Li R R,et al.The paradox between farmer willingness and their adoption of green technology from the perspective of green cognition[J].Resources Science,2017,39(8):1573-1583.]
    [34]Duncombe W,Robbins M,Stonecash J.Measuring citizen preferences for public services using surveys:Does a“Gray Peril”threaten funding for public education?[J].Public Budgeting&Finance,2010,23(1):45-72.
    [35]Lewis B D,Pattinasarany D.Determining citizen satisfaction with local public education in Indonesia:The significance of actual service quality and governance conditions[J].Growth&Change,2010,40(1):85-115.
    [36]高琳.分权与民生:财政自主权影响公共服务满意度的经验研究[J].经济研究,2012,47(7):86-98.[Gao L.Livelihood under decentralization:An empirical study on the impact of local fiscal autonomy on citizens’satisfaction with public services[J].Economic Research Journal,2012,47(7):86-98.]
    [37]郑旭媛,王芳,应瑞瑶.农户禀赋约束、技术属性与农业技术选择偏向:基于不完全要素市场条件下的农户技术采用分析框架[J].中国农村经济,2018,(3):105-122.[Zheng X Y,Wang F,Ying R Y.Farmers’endowment constraints,technical properties and agricultural technology selection preferences:An analytical framework of farmers’technology adoption under an incomplete factor market[J].Chinese Rural Economy,2018,(3):105-122.]
    [38]褚彩虹,冯淑怡,张蔚文.农户采用环境友好型农业技术行为的实证分析:以有机肥与测土配方施肥技术为例[J].中国农村经济,2012,(3):68-77.[Chu C H,Feng S Y,Zhang W W.Empirical study on farm households’behavior of adopting environmental-friendly farm technologies:A case study of organic fertilizer and formula fertilizer technologies[J].Chinese Rural Economy,2012,(3):68-77.]
    [39]徐志刚,张骏逸,吕开宇.经营规模、地权期限与跨期农业技术采用:以秸秆直接还田为例[J].中国农村经济,2018,(3):61-74.[Xu Z G,Zhang J Y,Lv K Y.The scale of operation,term of land ownership and the adoption of inter-temporal agricultural technology:An example of“straw return to soil directly”[J].Chinese Rural Economy,2018,(3):61-74.]
    [40]钱忠好,崔红梅.农民秸秆利用行为:理论与实证分析:基于江苏省南通市的调查数据[J].农业技术经济,2010,(9):4-9.[Qian Z H,Cui H M.Farmers’straw utilization behavior:Theory and empirical analysis:Based on the survey data of Nantong City,Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Agrotechnical Economics,2010,(9):4-9.]
    [41]李振宇,黄少安.制度失灵与技术创新:农民焚烧秸秆的经济学分析[J].中国农村观察,2002,(5):11-16,80.[Li Z Y,Huang S A.Institution failure and technological innovation:The economical analysis of the phenomenon of peasant’s burning stalk[J].China Rural Survey,2002,(5):11-16,80.]
    [42]张国磊,张新文.制度嵌入、精英下沉与基层社会治理:基于桂南Q市“联镇包村”的个案考察[J].公共管理学报,2017,14(4):44-53.[Zhang G L,Zhang X W.Institutional embeddedness,elite sinking and grassroots social governance:Based on the case study of“uniting town and contracting village”in Q City of South Guangxi[J].Journal of Public Management,2017,14(4):44-53.]
    [43]何可,张俊飚,张露,等.人际信任、制度信任与农民环境治理参与意愿:以农业废弃物资源化为例[J].管理世界,2015,(5):75-88.[He K,Zhang J B,Zhang L,et al.Interpersonal trust,institutional trust and farmers’willingness to participate in environmental governance:Based on the example of agricultural waste recycling[J].Management World,2015,(5):75-88.]

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700