优化护理管理措施对食管癌患者围手术期的应用效果分析
|
摘要
目的对食管癌患者在手术恢复期间展开优化护理管理的具体效果进行分析。方法该次研究所选取病例为100例,为2015年1月—2018年7月所接诊,取组中50例各方面护理操作均按照常规模式展开,即对照组,余下50例则需要展开优化护理管理,即观察组。对两组护理效果间差异进行分析。结果结合对护理满意度对比可知,观察组均具备优势(P<0.05)。观察组住院时间为(11.02±1.85)d,对照组为(18.43±1.76)d,对比可知,观察组明显较短(P<0.05);在卧床时间层面,观察组为(3.52±0.84)d,对照组为(4.83±0.21)d,对比可知,观察组用时较短(P<0.05)。结论将优化护理管理对策运用于食管癌患者手术期恢复中,能帮助患者各方面症状在较短时间内得到改善,并提升护理满意度,加快其恢复速度。
Objective To analyze the specific effects of optimal nursing management during the recovery of esophageal cancer patients. Methods 100 cases were selected in this study. The patients were admitted from January 2015 to July 2018.All the 50 nursing operations in the group were performed according to the normal mode, that is, the control group, and the remaining 50 cases needed to be developed optimized care management, ie observation group. The differences between the two groups of nursing effects were analyzed. Results The comparison of nursing satisfaction showed that the observation group had advantages(P<0.05). The hospitalization time of the observation group was(11.02±1.85) d, and the control group was(18.43±1.76) d. The comparison showed that the observation group was significantly shorter(P<0.05). At the bedtime level, the observation group was(3.52±0.84)d. The control group was(4.83±0.21)d. The comparison showed that the observation group was shorter(P<0.05). Conclusion Optimizing nursing management strategies for the recovery of patients with esophageal cancer during surgery can help patients to improve their symptoms in a short period of time, improve their satisfaction and speed up their recovery.
Objective To analyze the specific effects of optimal nursing management during the recovery of esophageal cancer patients. Methods 100 cases were selected in this study. The patients were admitted from January 2015 to July 2018.All the 50 nursing operations in the group were performed according to the normal mode, that is, the control group, and the remaining 50 cases needed to be developed optimized care management, ie observation group. The differences between the two groups of nursing effects were analyzed. Results The comparison of nursing satisfaction showed that the observation group had advantages(P<0.05). The hospitalization time of the observation group was(11.02±1.85) d, and the control group was(18.43±1.76) d. The comparison showed that the observation group was significantly shorter(P<0.05). At the bedtime level, the observation group was(3.52±0.84)d. The control group was(4.83±0.21)d. The comparison showed that the observation group was shorter(P<0.05). Conclusion Optimizing nursing management strategies for the recovery of patients with esophageal cancer during surgery can help patients to improve their symptoms in a short period of time, improve their satisfaction and speed up their recovery.
引文
[1]吴喜红.食管癌围手术期患者应用临床护理路径的价值分析[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2016,21(1):160-162.
[2]王丹.食管癌患者围手术期护理干预的效果分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(2):251-252.
[3]张曦,杜雪,白玉,等.早期预警评分联合标准化沟通模式在食管癌患者围手术期管理中的应用[J].中国实用护理杂志,2017,33(12):928-932.
[4]宋燕燕.快速康复外科护理在食管癌围手术期的应用效果分析[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(9):1724-1725.
[5]石一文,秦炳彩,蔡秋霞.优质护理在食管癌患者围手术期中的应用效果[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(12):204-206.
[6]沈晓冉.对行手术治疗的食管癌患者施行围手术期综合护理干预的效果分析[J].当代医药论丛,2016,14(22):159-160.
[7]刘瑞.食管癌围手术期应用快速康复外科护理的效果观察[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(52):10382.
[8]姜春辉.临床护理路径在24例食管癌围手术期患者中的应用价值分析[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(6):222-223.
[9]陈婷,李茜茜.早期肠内营养护理在食管癌围手术期快速康复治疗中的应用[J].成都医学院学报,2016,11(6):720-723.
[10]章靓,陈新华,高绪蕾,等.医护一体化模式在胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术围手术期的应用[J].安徽医药,2016,20(11):2183-2186.
[2]王丹.食管癌患者围手术期护理干预的效果分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(2):251-252.
[3]张曦,杜雪,白玉,等.早期预警评分联合标准化沟通模式在食管癌患者围手术期管理中的应用[J].中国实用护理杂志,2017,33(12):928-932.
[4]宋燕燕.快速康复外科护理在食管癌围手术期的应用效果分析[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(9):1724-1725.
[5]石一文,秦炳彩,蔡秋霞.优质护理在食管癌患者围手术期中的应用效果[J].中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(12):204-206.
[6]沈晓冉.对行手术治疗的食管癌患者施行围手术期综合护理干预的效果分析[J].当代医药论丛,2016,14(22):159-160.
[7]刘瑞.食管癌围手术期应用快速康复外科护理的效果观察[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(52):10382.
[8]姜春辉.临床护理路径在24例食管癌围手术期患者中的应用价值分析[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(6):222-223.
[9]陈婷,李茜茜.早期肠内营养护理在食管癌围手术期快速康复治疗中的应用[J].成都医学院学报,2016,11(6):720-723.
[10]章靓,陈新华,高绪蕾,等.医护一体化模式在胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术围手术期的应用[J].安徽医药,2016,20(11):2183-2186.