用户名: 密码: 验证码:
宁夏玉米和小麦干旱风险评价研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:DROUGHT RISK ASSESSMENT OF MAIZE AND WHEAT CROPPING IN NINGXIA
  • 作者:包阿茹汗 ; 覃志豪 ; 高懋芳 ; 张晓煜 ; 李红英
  • 英文作者:Bao Aruhan;Qin Zhihao;Gao Maofang;Zhang Xiaoyu;Li Hongying;Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning ,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Ningxia Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Reduction;
  • 关键词:宁夏 ; 农业干旱 ; 风险评价 ; 玉米 ; 小麦
  • 英文关键词:Ningxia;;agricultural drought;;risk assessment;;maize;;wheat
  • 中文刊名:ZGNZ
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning
  • 机构:中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所;宁夏气象防灾减灾重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-25
  • 出版单位:中国农业资源与区划
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.40;No.256
  • 基金:中国农业科学院科技创新工程协同创新任务课题(CAAS-XTCX2016007);; 国家自然科学基金面上项目(41771406)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZGNZ201904012
  • 页数:16
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:11-3513/S
  • 分类号:75-89+97
摘要
[目的]分析宁夏23年(1993—2016年)玉米和小麦干旱时空分布格局及演变趋势,探讨各县玉米和小麦的干旱风险成因及关键作用因子,以期为宁夏县级作物防旱抗灾工作提供科学依据。[方法]本文基于成灾综合评价法,从干旱对玉米和小麦种植的危险性、玉米和小麦在干旱环境下的暴露性、玉米和小麦种植在干旱胁迫下的脆弱性和区域农业抗旱能力4个方面选取指标构建作物干旱风险模型,利用1981—2016年气象数据资料及玉米、小麦生育期资料、玉米小麦产量和面积等数据,分析计算宁夏各地区的玉米和小麦的干旱风险。[结果] 23年间(1993—2016年)宁夏玉米和小麦干旱风险整体上呈逐步上升趋势,玉米干旱风险上升趋势明显,最高达到45%。而小麦干旱风险趋势较平缓,干旱风险水平在30%~40%之间。品种间的差异主要在于干旱危险性指数和暴露性指数间差异较大,玉米干旱暴露度高,生育期较长,潜在蒸散量大,降水无法供应生育期内的需水量,因而玉米干旱风险较大。从空间分布来看,小麦干旱风险高值区分布范围较广,由于小麦生育期在雨季初期,降水量较少,且种植面积大,因而受旱面积较大。各县(市)玉米和小麦危险性、暴露性指数权重均在0. 3以上,是导致玉米和小麦干旱风险较高的主要原因。[结论]因此调整种植比例,减少小麦的种植面积,加强农村脱贫,增加农民收入,是减少干旱危害的有效措施。
        The research is intended to analyze the spatial and temporal distribution patterns and evolution trends of maize and wheat drought in Ningxia from 1993 to 2016 and explore the causes and key factors of drought risk of maize and wheat in each county,so as to provide a scientific basis for the drought prevention and disaster relief work of county-level crops in Ningxia. Based on the theory of disaster risk,this research established a crop drought risk model by selecting indexes from four aspects including the drought hazard of maize and wheat planting,the exposure of maize and wheat in drought environments,the vulnerability of maize and wheat planting under drought stress and the regional drought resistance of agriculture. Moreover,it calculated the drought risk of maize and wheat and discussed the causes and key factors of drought risk in different regions of Ningxia by adopting the data,such as the meteorological data in Ningxia from 1981 to 2016,the growth period data of maize and wheat,and the yield and area of maize and wheat. The results show that from the 1993 to 2016,the drought risk of maize and wheat in Ningxia increases gradually,and the trend of maize drought risk increases significantly,reaching a maximum of45%. The trend of wheat drought risk is relatively gentle,and the drought risk level is between 30% ~ 40%. The differences between the varieties are mainly due to the drought hazard index and the exposure index,the high drought exposure of maize,the long growth period,the large potential evapotranspiration,and the precipitation can't supply the amount of water needed during the growth period,so the maize drought risk is larger. From the perspective of spatial distribution,the high value of wheat drought risk distribution area is relatively wide,because the wheat growth period is in the early rainy season,the precipitation is less,and the planting area is large,so the area affected by drought is larger. The weights of the hazard and exposure indexes of maize and wheat in all counties( cities) are all above 0. 3,which is the main reason for the higher drought risk of maize and wheat. Therefore,we should adjust the proportion of planting,reduce the wheat planting area,strengthen poverty alleviation in rural areas,and increase farmers' income,which is an effective measure to reduce the damage caused by drought.
引文
[1]覃志豪,唐华俊,李文娟.气候变化对我国粮食生产系统影响的研究前沿.中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(01):1-8.
    [2]Hong Wu,Wilhite D A.An Operational Agricultural Drought Risk Assessment Model for Nebraska.Natural Hazards,2004,33:1-21.
    [3]霍治国,李世奎,王素艳,等.主要农业气象灾害风险评估技术及其应用研究.自然资源学报,2003,18(6):49-60.
    [4]刘义花,李林,颜亮东,等.基于灾损评估的青海省牧草干旱风险区划研究.冰川冻土,2013,35(3):681-686.
    [5]徐创新,葛全胜,郑景云,等.农业干旱风险评估研究综述.干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(6):263-270.
    [6]张继权,严登华,王春乙,等.辽西北地区农业干旱灾害风险评价与风险区划研究.防灾减灾工程学报,2012,32(3):52-58.
    [7]何斌,王全九,吴迪,等.基于主成分分析和层次分析法相结合的陕西农业干旱风险评估.干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(1):219-227.
    [8]秦越,徐翔宇,许凯,等.农业干旱灾害风险模糊评价体系及其应用.农业工程学报,2013,212(10):91-99.
    [9]徐桂珍.基于自然灾害风险理论的陕西省典型作物干旱灾害风险评估与区划.中国农村水利水电,2017,(7):179-184.
    [10]李红英,张晓煜,袁海燕,等.宁夏农业干旱灾害综合风险分析.中国沙漠,2013,33(3):882-887.
    [11]张晓煜,杨晓光,韩颖娟,等.宁夏南部山区农业干旱预警模型.农业工程学报,2011,27(4):41-47.
    [12]王连喜,孟丹,耿秀华,等.基于GIS的宁夏农业干旱风险评价与区划.自然灾害学报,2013,22(5):213-220.
    [13]杨建玲,冯建民,郑广芬,等.宁夏中南部地区干旱变化趋势分析.中国沙漠,2012,32(3):842-851.
    [14]王亚飞,廖顺宝.气候变化对粮食产量影响的研究方法综述.中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(12):54-63.
    [15]信乃诠.中国农业气象学.北京:中国农业出版社,1999,401-403.
    [16]单琨,刘布春,刘园,等.基于自然灾害系统理论的辽宁省玉米干旱风险分析.农业工程学报,2012,28(8):186-194.
    [17]贾建英,贺楠,韩兰英,等.基于自然灾害风险理论和Arc GIS的西南地区玉米干旱风险分析.农业工程学报,2015,31(4):152-159.
    [18]刘学军,张红玲,陆阳,等.宁夏扬黄延伸区限额灌溉保证率与产量关系研究.水资源与水工程学报,2013,24(4):74-77.
    [19]Allen R G,Pereira L S,Dirk R,et al.Crop Evapotranspiration:Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements.FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56,Rome,1998.
    [20]王春乙,张玉静,张继权.华北地区冬小麦主要气象灾害风险评价.农业工程学报,2016,32(S1):203-213.
    [21]Huang L,Yang P,Ren S.The Vulnerability Assessment Method for Beijing Agricultural Drought.Ifip Advances in Information&Communication Technology,2015,419:269-280.
    [22]F K Sonmez,A U Komuscu,A Erkan,et al.An Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Dimension of Drought Vulnerability in Turkey Using the Standardized Precipitation Index.Natural Hazards,2005,35(2):243-264.
    [23]李瑞杰,李德竹,梅润雨,等.基于集对分析和可变模糊集的区域抗旱能力评价模型.水资源保护,2013,29(5):59-64.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700