农村土地经营制度的发展与创新——从“两权分离”向“三权分置”的跨越
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Development and Innovation of Rural Land Management System——The Leap from “Separation of Two Powers” to “Separation of Three Powers”
  • 作者:王超
  • 英文作者:WANG Chao;Teaching and Research Section of Law and Public Administration, CPC Chenzhou Municipal Party School;
  • 关键词:两权分离 ; 三权分置 ; 覆盖 ; 突破
  • 英文关键词:separation of the two powers;;separation of the three powers;;coverage;;breakthrough
  • 中文刊名:CQSZ
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences(Social Sciences Edition)
  • 机构:中共郴州市委党校法学公共管理教研室;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-28
  • 出版单位:重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.38;No.163
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CQSZ201902003
  • 页数:7
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:50-1182/C
  • 分类号:22-28
摘要
研究目的:从历史维度考察自1956年我国完成社会主义改造以来农村土地经营制度演进的历史轨迹,发现其演变规律,以破解当前农地"三权分置"的路径困局。研究方法:法律(政策)文本分析法、历史对比法、逻辑推理法。研究结论:我国农村土地经营制度经历了一个"一生二、二生三"的发展历程,"一生二"是指一权变两权的"两权分离","二生三"是指两权变三权的"三权分置"。十八大以来,特别是十九大以后,在国情农情发生重大变化的历史条件下,习近平有关"三权分置"的论述是习近平"三农观"在"两权分离"基础上的进一步发展,既有原则性的继承,又有突破和创新,并在权利体系和经营理念上对"两权分离"进行了全新覆盖。
        Research goal: from the historical dimension, the historical track of the evolution of rural land management system was examined since the completion of socialist transformation in 1956, and the evolution law was obtained, in order to solve the current dilemma of the path of "separation of three powers" of agricultural land. Research methods:Law(policy) text analysis, historical contrast and logical reasoning. Conclusion: China's rural land management system has undergone a development process of "one divided into two, and two divided into three"; "one divided into two"refers to the "separation of two powers", and "two divided into three" refers to the "separation of three powers". Since the Eighteenth National Congress of CPC, especially after the Nineteenth National Congress of CPC, under the historical conditions of great changes in the national conditions and agricultural conditions, Comrade Xi Jinping's exposition of "separation of three powers" is a further development of Xi Jinping's "three rural areas" thought on the basis of"separation of two powers". It is not only a principled inheritance, but also a creative breakthrough and innovation, as well as a new coverage of power system and management concept on the "separation of two powers".
引文
[1]叶兴庆.从“两权分离”到“三权分离”———我国农地产权制度的过去与未来[J].中国党政干部论坛,2014(6):7-12.
    [2]中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2017.
    [3]丁文.论“三权分置”中的土地承包权[J].法商研究,2017(3):15-26.
    [4]张学博.农村土地“三权分置”的法理逻辑———从政策和法律双重视角切入[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(6):103-111.
    [5]申惠文.论农村承包经营户的死亡[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2016(2):106-118.
    [6]陈小君.《农村土地承包法修正案(草案)》要义评析[J].中国土地科学,2018(5):1-6.
    [7]丁文.论土地承包权与土地承包经营权的分离[J].中国法学,2015(3):159-178.
    [8]朱继胜.农村承包地“三权分置”改革的法律风险及防范[J].理论月刊,2017(11):5-12.
    [9]宗仁.“土改”新思维:农地股份共有制[J].南京社会科学,2017(9):28-35.
    [10]单平基.“三权分置”理论反思与土地承包经营权困境的解决路径[J].法学,2016(9):54-66.
    [11]王超.农村土地经营权研究[J].西部学刊,2018(7):60-64.
    [12]孔祥智.“三权分置”的重点是强化经营权[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2017(3):22-28.
    [13]孙宪忠.推进农地三权分置经营模式的立法研究[J].中国社会科学,2016(7):145-163,208-209.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700