基于共生理论的乡村旅游精准扶贫模式和路径优化研究——以山东省沂南县竹泉村为例
|
摘要
基于生物学中的共生理论,以山东省沂南县竹泉村为案例,对乡村旅游精准扶贫模式、利益主体共生模式以及旅游精准扶贫路径优化进行分析。结果表明:竹泉村在乡村旅游发展中面临景区过度商业化、利益分配不公平、弱势群体发展权利无保障等突出性问题。村落利益主体之间一体化互惠共生模式应为最佳合作模式。据此提出竹泉村乡村旅游精准扶贫发展应实现求同存异、资源共享、利益共享以及加强利益协调监管、加强社区管理自治、建立共生参与方式、发展村集体经济和合作社经济等优化路径,解决竹泉村乡村旅游扶贫困境。
Based on the symbiosis theory in biology,taking Zhuquan Village,Yinan County,Shandong Province as a case study,the research on poverty alleviation mode and path optimization of rural tourism in Zhuquan Village was carried out. In the development of rural tourism,Zhuquan Village faces prominent problems such as excessive commercialization of scenic spots,unfair distribution of interests,and insecure development rights of vulnerable groups. From the perspective of symbiosis theory,this paper analyzes the symbiotic co-occurrence mode of Zhuquan Village's interest subjects,and believes that the integration and reciprocal symbiosis model among village stakeholders should be the best cooperation mode. It is proposed that Zhuquan Village rural tourism should achieve the common development of poverty alleviation,resource sharing and benefit sharing,establish a sound interest coordination supervision mechanism,strengthen community management autonomy,establish an efficient multi-subject participation mode,and develop the village collective economy and cooperative economy.
Based on the symbiosis theory in biology,taking Zhuquan Village,Yinan County,Shandong Province as a case study,the research on poverty alleviation mode and path optimization of rural tourism in Zhuquan Village was carried out. In the development of rural tourism,Zhuquan Village faces prominent problems such as excessive commercialization of scenic spots,unfair distribution of interests,and insecure development rights of vulnerable groups. From the perspective of symbiosis theory,this paper analyzes the symbiotic co-occurrence mode of Zhuquan Village's interest subjects,and believes that the integration and reciprocal symbiosis model among village stakeholders should be the best cooperation mode. It is proposed that Zhuquan Village rural tourism should achieve the common development of poverty alleviation,resource sharing and benefit sharing,establish a sound interest coordination supervision mechanism,strengthen community management autonomy,establish an efficient multi-subject participation mode,and develop the village collective economy and cooperative economy.
引文
[1]张晓,李春晓,杨德进.民族地区旅游扶贫多主体参与模式探析——以四川省马边彝族自治县为例[J].地域研究与开发,2018,37(2):99-103.
[2]李瑞,黄慧玲,刘竞.山岳旅游景区旅游扶贫模式探析——基于对伏牛山重渡沟景区田野调查的思考[J].地域研究与开发,2012,31(1):94-98.
[3]王慧.旅游扶贫背景下乡村旅游开发模式的研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(3):198-201.
[4]银马华,王群,杨兴柱,等.区域旅游扶贫类型与模式研究——以大别山集中连片特困区36个县(市)为例[J].经济地理,2018,38(4):215-224.
[5]张军,蒋黄蓁苑,时朋飞.美丽乡村视域下的旅游扶贫模式与效应研究——以湖北省十堰市张湾区为例[J].湖北社会科学,2017(6):60-68.
[6]王孔敬. PPT战略视野下民族山区旅游扶贫开发模式研究——以湖北武陵山区为例[J].湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,33(6):35-38.
[7]李佳,成升魁,马金刚,等.基于县域要素的三江源地区旅游扶贫模式探讨[J].资源科学,2009,31(11):1818-1824.
[8]黄国庆.连片特困地区旅游扶贫模式研究[J].求索,2013(5):253-255.
[9]邢慧斌,席建超.燕山—太行山片区旅游精准扶贫模式创新研究[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,42(2):118-125.
[10] DE BARY A. Die Erscheinung Der Symbiose[M]. Strassburg:Verlag Von Karl J. Trubner,1879.
[11] STRINGER P F,PEARCE P L. Toward A Symbiosis of Social Psychology and Tourism Sstudies[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,1984,11(1):5-17.
[12]袁纯清.共生理论及其对小型经济的应用研究(上)[J].改革,1998(2):100-104.
[13]钟俊.共生:旅游发展的新思路[J].重庆师专学报,2001,20(3):17-19.
[14]吴泓,顾朝林.基于共生理论的区域旅游竞合研究——以淮海经济区为例[J].经济地理,2004,24(1):104-109.
[15]肖海平,谷人旭,黄静波.湘粤赣“红三角”省际边界区旅游资源联动开发共生模式研究[J].世界地理研究,2010,19(3):121-127.
[16]王树茂.沂蒙精神薪火相传新时代红色旅游亮丽开篇[N].中国旅游报,2017-11-24(A1).
[17]蒋莉,黄静波.罗霄山区旅游扶贫效应的居民感知与态度研究——以湖南汝城国家森林公园九龙江地区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2015,34(4):99-104.
[18]王京传.旅游目的地治理中的公众参与机制研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2016:63-65.
[19]黄小勇.区域经济共生发展的界定与解构[J].华东经济管理,2014,28(1):153-159.
[20]袁纯清.共生理论——兼论小型经济[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1998.
[2]李瑞,黄慧玲,刘竞.山岳旅游景区旅游扶贫模式探析——基于对伏牛山重渡沟景区田野调查的思考[J].地域研究与开发,2012,31(1):94-98.
[3]王慧.旅游扶贫背景下乡村旅游开发模式的研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(3):198-201.
[4]银马华,王群,杨兴柱,等.区域旅游扶贫类型与模式研究——以大别山集中连片特困区36个县(市)为例[J].经济地理,2018,38(4):215-224.
[5]张军,蒋黄蓁苑,时朋飞.美丽乡村视域下的旅游扶贫模式与效应研究——以湖北省十堰市张湾区为例[J].湖北社会科学,2017(6):60-68.
[6]王孔敬. PPT战略视野下民族山区旅游扶贫开发模式研究——以湖北武陵山区为例[J].湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,33(6):35-38.
[7]李佳,成升魁,马金刚,等.基于县域要素的三江源地区旅游扶贫模式探讨[J].资源科学,2009,31(11):1818-1824.
[8]黄国庆.连片特困地区旅游扶贫模式研究[J].求索,2013(5):253-255.
[9]邢慧斌,席建超.燕山—太行山片区旅游精准扶贫模式创新研究[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,42(2):118-125.
[10] DE BARY A. Die Erscheinung Der Symbiose[M]. Strassburg:Verlag Von Karl J. Trubner,1879.
[11] STRINGER P F,PEARCE P L. Toward A Symbiosis of Social Psychology and Tourism Sstudies[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,1984,11(1):5-17.
[12]袁纯清.共生理论及其对小型经济的应用研究(上)[J].改革,1998(2):100-104.
[13]钟俊.共生:旅游发展的新思路[J].重庆师专学报,2001,20(3):17-19.
[14]吴泓,顾朝林.基于共生理论的区域旅游竞合研究——以淮海经济区为例[J].经济地理,2004,24(1):104-109.
[15]肖海平,谷人旭,黄静波.湘粤赣“红三角”省际边界区旅游资源联动开发共生模式研究[J].世界地理研究,2010,19(3):121-127.
[16]王树茂.沂蒙精神薪火相传新时代红色旅游亮丽开篇[N].中国旅游报,2017-11-24(A1).
[17]蒋莉,黄静波.罗霄山区旅游扶贫效应的居民感知与态度研究——以湖南汝城国家森林公园九龙江地区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2015,34(4):99-104.
[18]王京传.旅游目的地治理中的公众参与机制研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2016:63-65.
[19]黄小勇.区域经济共生发展的界定与解构[J].华东经济管理,2014,28(1):153-159.
[20]袁纯清.共生理论——兼论小型经济[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1998.