寒区冰雪期居民出行方式综合评价

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Comprehensive Evaluation of Resident Travel Mode during Ice and Snow Period in Cold Areas 作者：冯天军 ; 周林芳 ; 程国柱 ; 翟露露 ; 吴立新 英文作者：FENG Tianjun;ZHOU Linfang;CHENG Guozhu;ZHAI Lulu;WU Lixin;School of Transportation Science and Engineering,Jilin Jianzhu Universtiy;School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology;School of Traffic and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University; 关键词：寒冷地区 ; 冰雪期 ; 出行方式 ; 综合评价 ; 主成分分析法 英文关键词：cold area;;ice and snow period;;travel mode;;comprehensive evaluation;;principal component analysis 中文刊名：DLTD 英文刊名：Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University 机构：吉林建筑大学交通科学与工程学院;哈尔滨工业大学交通科学与工程学院;东北林业大学交通学院; 出版日期：2019-07-25 出版单位：大连交通大学学报 年：2019 期：v.40;No.184 基金：吉林省教育厅"十三五"科学技术研究资助项目(JJKH20180609KJ) 语种：中文; 页：DLTD201904002 页数：7 CN：04 ISSN：21-1550/U 分类号：8-14

摘要

为给寒区冰雪期交通资源的优化配置提供理论依据,对居民出行方式进行了综合评价.从出行者的安全性、效率性、经济性、舒适性等四个方面构建了评价指标体系,进而构建了寒区冰雪期居民出行方式的综合评价模型;然后对哈尔滨这一典型寒区城市其冰雪期的居民出行成本与效益进行量化,运用主成分分析法,借助SPSS软件,标定了模型参数;以哈尔滨为案例,对冰雪期不同出行方式的优劣性进行了评价.结果表明,冰雪期哈尔滨居民出行方式总得分为3.99,其中居民选择地铁出行的得分最高,为1.15,即地铁的出行总成本最小,所以,可将地铁作为寒区的主导交通出行方式并大力发展.
        In order to provide a theoretical basis for optimizing traffic resources in cold areas during ice and snow period, a comprehensive evaluation of different travel modes for urban residents was established with the consideration of safety, efficiency, economy and comfort. Then, a comprehensive evaluation model was constructed for urban residents living in the cold areas during ice and snow season. On the basis of quantifying the travel cost and benefit of the residents living in Harbin, a typical city located in the cold area, the parameters of the model were calibrated by using principal component analysis(PCA) and SPSS. The advantages and disadvantages of the different modes during the period of ice and snow in Harbin were evaluated. The result shows that the general score is 3.99. However, the score of metro is 1.15, the highest, which means that the cost of metro is the least. Therefore, metro can be developed as a leading travel mode in cold areas in the future.

引文

[1]LEVINSON D,GILLEN D,KANAFANI A,et al.The full cost of intercity transportation-a comparison of high speed rail,air and highway transportation in California[M].CA:University of California at Berkeley,1996.
    [2]KOUSHKI P A.Personal cost of auto travel in Kuwait[J].Journal of Transportation Engineering,2007,133(4):275-280.
    [3]Economic Analysis Directorate of Transport Canada.Estimates of the full cost of transportation in Canada [R].Canada:Transport Canada,2008.
    [4]胡永举.城市居民出行成本的量化方法研究[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2009,7(1):5-10.
    [5]徐婷,蓝漆,胡大伟,等.城市居民出行成本的量化方法研究[J].交通运输工程学报,2013,13(1) :91-97.
    [6]叶盈.出行方式链成本测算方法研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2015.
    [7]MATTHIAS N S,CHEN MENGKE.Does regional travel time unreliability influence mode choice[J].Transportation,2011,38:625-642.
    [8]WANG Y,YAN X,ZHOU Y,et al.Using AHP for evaluating travel mode competitiveness in long-distance travel[C].International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety.IEEE,2015.
    [9]YE R,TITHERIDGE H.Satisfaction with the commute:The role of travel mode choice,built environment and attitudes[J].Transportation Research Part D Transport & Environment,2016,51(B):535-547.
    [10]马健霄,邬岚.交通方式结构对城市可持续发展的影响分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(6):102-106.
    [11]张本森.冰雪条件下居民出行方式选择研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2012:9-62.
    [12]宁燕.城市交通方式结构评价研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2011:6-58.
    [13]2015年哈尔滨市居民出行O-D专题分析报告[R].北京:北京晶众智慧交通科技有限公司,2015.
    [14]朱林波.主成分分析法在城市交通可持续发展评价中的应用[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(1):63-66.
    [15]吴立新,程国柱,秦丽辉,等.寒区冰雪期城市道路交通冲突与事故预测[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2016,16(6):216-221.