用户名: 密码: 验证码:
渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷沙一下亚段页岩油可动量评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Evaluation of movable shale oil reserves in the Es~(1L) of the Raoyang sag,Jizhong Depression
  • 作者:陈方文 ; 赵红琴 ; 王淑萍 ; 卢双舫 ; 王民 ; 丁雪
  • 英文作者:Chen Fangwen;Zhao Hongqin;Wang Shuping;Lu Shuangfang;Wang Min;Ding Xue;Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas,China University of Petroleum(East China);School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum(East China);Oil Industry Training Center,China University of Petroleum(East China);
  • 关键词:弹性驱 ; 溶解气驱 ; 可动油量 ; 泥页岩储层 ; 页岩油 ; 沙一下亚段 ; 饶阳凹陷 ; 渤海湾盆地
  • 英文关键词:depletion drive;;dissolution gas drive;;movable oil reserve;;shale reservoir;;shale oil;;Es1L;;Raoyang sag;;Bohai Bay Basin
  • 中文刊名:SYYT
  • 英文刊名:Oil & Gas Geology
  • 机构:中国石油大学(华东)深层油气重点实验室;中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院;中国石油大学(华东)石油工业训练中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-17 09:01
  • 出版单位:石油与天然气地质
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.40
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(41530315,41330313);; 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR201807060444);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(18CX02071A)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SYYT201903015
  • 页数:9
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:11-4820/TE
  • 分类号:147-155
摘要
以渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷沙一下亚段页岩油储层为例,对不同埋深层状和块状泥页岩储层岩心样品开展有机碳、热解和孔隙度等实验分析,结合研究层段测井曲线,弄清储层岩石压缩系数、原油压缩系数、地层水压缩系数和原始含油饱和度随深度的变化特征,确定块状和层状泥页岩储层最大天然可动油量随深度的变化特征。研究表明:除了在2 500 m未熟油阶段有一段高值区之外,沙一下亚段块状和层状泥页岩储层中弹性驱可动油量和溶解气驱可动油量均随深度增加而增大。块状储层弹性驱可动油率明显大于层状样品,其溶解气驱可动油率略小于层状储层。但单位体积块状泥页岩储层弹性驱可动油量、溶解气驱可动油量分别略小于和明显小于层状样品。块状和层状泥页岩储层弹性驱可动油量平均值分别为0. 13×10-3t/m3和0. 14×10-3t/m3,溶解气驱可动油量平均值分别为0. 56×10-3t/m3和1. 27×10-3t/m3。
        The Es~(1L)shale oil reservoir in the Raoyang sag,Jizhong Depression,was studied to measure the reservoir rock,crude oil and formation water compressibilities as well as original oil saturation variation with depth,which enable the determination of the variation of the maximum movable oil reserves in massive and laminated shale core samples from different burial depth. These shale core samples were analyzed in terms of organic carbon content( TOC),Rock-Eval and porosity according to the well logging plot for the studied horizons. The results show that the movable oil reserves of natural depletion and dissolution gas drive increase with increasing burial depth both in massive and laminated shale reservoirs in Es~(1L),except for a sweat spot area located at a burial depth of 2 500 m at the immature production stage. Under natural depletion conditions,the movable oil ratio in massive reservoirs is markedly larger than that in laminated reservoirs,while slightly smaller under solution gas drive conditions. The movable reserves in per unit volume of massive shale oil reservoirs are slightly and obviously smaller than those in laminated shale oil reservoirs under natural depletion and dissolution gas drive respectively. The average movable reserves under natural depletion are 0. 13 × 10-3 t/m3 and 0. 14 × 10-3 t/m3,and those under dissolution gas drive are 0. 56 × 10-3 t/m3 and 1. 27 × 10-3 t/m3 in massive and laminated shale reservoirs respectively.
引文
[1]卢双舫,黄文彪,陈方文,等.页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):13-14.Lu Shuangfang,Huang Wenbiao,Chen Fangwen,et al. Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources:Discussion and application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):13-14.
    [2]胡文瑞.中国石油非常规油气业务发展与展望[J].天然气工业,2008,28(7):5-7.Hu Wenrui. Development and potential of unconventional oil and gas resources in china national petroleum corporation[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(7):5-7.
    [3]贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136.Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
    [4]邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,等.页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):14-26.Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Cui Jingwei,et al. Formation mechanism,geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1):14-26.
    [5]马永生,冯建辉,牟泽辉,等.中国石化非常规油气资源潜力及勘探进展[J].中国工程科学,2012,14(6):22-30.Ma Yongsheng,Feng Jianhui,Mu Zehui,et al. The potential and exploring progress of unconventional hydrocarbon resources in SINOPEC[J]. Engineering Science,2012,14(6):22-30.
    [6]张金川,林腊梅,李玉喜,等.页岩油分类与评价[J].地学前缘,2012,19(5):322-331.Zhang Jinchuan,Lin Lamei,Li Yuxi,et al. Classification and evelation of shale oil[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(5):322-331.
    [7]薛海涛,田善思,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源定量评价中关键参数的选取与校正———以松辽盆地北部青山口组为例[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2015,34(1):70-78.Xue Haitao,Tian Shansi,Lu Shuangfang,et al. Selection and verification of key parameters in the quantitative evaluation of shale oil:A case study at the Qingshankou Formation,Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2015,34(1):70-78.
    [8]付茜.中国页岩油勘探开发现状、挑战及前景[J].石油钻采工艺,2015,37(4):58-62.Fu Qian. The status,challenge and prospect of shale oil exploration and development in China[J]. Oil Drilling&Production Technology,2015,37(4):58-62.
    [9]柳波,吕延防,冉清昌,等.松辽盆地北部青山口组页岩油形成地质条件及勘探潜力[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(2):280-285.Liu Bo,LüYanfang,Ran Qingchang,et al. Geological conditions and exploration potential of shale oil in Qingshankou Formation,Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2014,35(2):280-285.
    [10]王敏.页岩油评价的关键参数及求取方法研究[J].沉积学报,2014,32(1):174-181.Wang Min. Key parameterand calculation in shale oil reservoir evaluation[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(1):174-181.
    [11]卢双舫,薛海涛,王民,等.页岩油评价中的若干关键问题及研究趋势[J].石油学报,2016,37(10):1309-1322.Lu Shuangfang,Xue Haitao,Wang Min,et al. Several key issues and research trends in evaluation of shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(10):1309-1322.
    [12]李骥远,卢双舫.利用核磁共振T1-T2谱技术研究页岩油可动性[J].中国锰业,2017,35(4):169-172.Li Jiyuan,Lu Shuangfang. Using MRI T1-T2Technology to Research the Mobility of Shale Oil[J]. China’s Manganese Industry,2017,35(4):169-172.
    [13]桑茜,张少杰,朱超凡,等.陆相页岩油储层可动流体的核磁共振研究[J].中国科技论文,2017,12(9):978-983.Sang Qian,Zhang Shaojie,Zhu Chaofan,et al. Study on movable fluid of continental shale oil reservoir with NMR technology[J]. China Sciencepaper,2017,12(9):978-983.
    [14] Su Siyuan,Jiang Zhenxue,Shan Xuanlong,et al. The wettability of shale by NMR measurements and its controlling factors[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,169:309-316.
    [15] Zhang Pengfei,Lu Shuangfang,Li Junqian,et al. Petrophysical characterization of oil-bearing shales by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR)[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,89:775-785.
    [16] Li Yaxiong,Hu Zhiming,Liu Xiangui,et al. Insights into interactions and microscopic behavior of shale gas in organic-rich nano-slits by molecular simulation[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2018,59:309-325.
    [17]柯思.泌阳凹陷页岩油赋存状态及可动性探讨[J].石油地质与工程,2017,31(1):80-83.Ke Si. Discussion on the occurrence status and mobility of shale oil in Biyang Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2017,31(1):80-83.
    [18] Su Siyuan,Jiang Zhenxue,Shan Xuanlong,et al. The effects of shale pore structure and mineral components on shale oil accumulation in the Zhanhua Sag,Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,165:365-374.
    [19]张林晔,包友书,李钜源,等.湖相页岩油可动性———以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(6):641-649.Zhang Linye,Bao Youshu,Li Juyuan,et al. Movability of lacustrine shale oil:A case study of Dongying Sag,Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(6):641-649.
    [20]包友书,张林晔,张金功,等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系页岩油可动性影响因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(3):408-414.Bao Youshu,Zhang Linye,Zhang Jingong,et al. Factors influencing mobility of Paleogene shale oil in Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2016,37(3):408-414.
    [21]王文广,郑民,王民,等.页岩油可动资源量评价方法探讨及在东濮凹陷北部古近系沙河街组应用[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(4):771-781.Wang Wenguang,Zheng Min,Wang Min,et al. The discussion of the evaluation method of shale oil movable resources amount and palaeogene shahejie formation application effect in the northern of dongpu depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(4):771-781.
    [22]崔殿,查明,高长海,等.饶阳凹陷任西断层的封闭性[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,34(6):20-24.Cui Dian,Zha Ming,Gao Changhai,et al. Fault sealing of Renxi fault in Raoyang depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum,2010,34(6):20-24.
    [23]赵贤正,卢学军,崔周旗,等.断陷盆地斜坡带精细层序地层研究与勘探成效[J].地学前缘,2012,19(1):10-19.Zhao Xianzheng,Lu Xuejun,Cui Zhouqi,et al. Detailed research of fine sequence stratigraphy and exploration results in the slope zone of faulted basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(1):10-19.
    [24]杨帆,于兴河,李胜利,等.冀中坳陷蠡县斜坡油藏分布规律与主控因素研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2010,32(4):37-41.Yang Fan,Yu Xinghe,Li Shengli,et al. Rules of reservoir distribution of lixian slope and its critical controlling factors in Jizhong Depression[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2010,32(4):37-41.
    [25] ChenFangwen,Lu Shuangfang,Ding Xue. Pore types and quantitative evaluation of pore volumes in the Longmaxi Shale of Southeast Chongqing,China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica(English edition),2018,92(1),342–353.
    [26]杨巍,薛莲花,唐俊,等.页岩孔隙度测量实验方法分析与评价[J].沉积学报,2015,33(6):1258-1264.Yang Wei,Xue Lian Hua,Tang Jun,et al. Analysis and evaluation of different measuring methods for shale porosity[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(6):1258-1264.
    [27] He Fugui,Gao Xianzhi,Zhao Xianzheng,et al. The lower part of the first member of the Shahejie formation(Es1x)as a source rock for oil found in Lixian Slope,Raoyang Sag,Bohai Bay Basin,Northern China[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2017,10:101.
    [28]王丽忱.页岩气藏岩石力学性质的测井评价方法与应用[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2013.Wang Lichen. Research on logging evaluation and application of rock mechanics properties in shale gas reservoirs[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2013.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700