2013—2015年深圳市福田区高血压前期人群干预效果

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Effect of lifestyle intervention among pre-hypertensive population in Futian District of Shenzhen City from 2013 to 2015 作者：刘敏 ; 倪文庆 ; 徐健 ; 徐建伟 ; 吉宁 ; 白雅敏 英文作者：Liu Min;Ni Wenqing;Xu Jian;Xu Jianwei;Ji Ning;Bai Yamin;National Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention;Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control; 关键词：高血压前期 ; 生活方式干预 ; 社区人群 ; 效果评估 英文关键词：prehypertension;;lifestyle intervention;;community;;effective evaluation 中文刊名：WSYJ 英文刊名：Journal of Hygiene Research 机构：中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心;深圳市慢性病防治中心; 出版日期：2019-03-30 出版单位：卫生研究 年：2019 期：v.48 语种：中文; 页：WSYJ201902004 页数：6 CN：02 ISSN：11-2158/R 分类号：40-45

摘要

目的评估深圳市福田区高血压前期人群生活方式干预效果。方法 2013年10—11月从深圳市福田区随机抽取12个社区,从被选取的社区中筛查出高血压前期人群1183名。按照社区来源不同将其分为干预组(834人)和对照组(349人),干预内容包括减少钠盐摄入、控制体重和适量运动、戒烟和限制饮酒等,干预形式为群体活动与个体随访相结合,要求每季度至少开展1次活动及随访。对照组不主动提供除常规工作外的任何干预活动。2015年11—12月对纳入管理的高血压前期人群进行评估,共收集到参加基线调查的高血压前期人群944名(干预组607人,对照组337人)。结果干预后,干预组人群主动控油的比例由36.6%上升至55.7%(χ~2=44.71,P<0.01)、主动限盐比例由44.8%上升至61.1%(χ~2=32.72,P<0.01)、身体活动的经常锻炼率由24.1%上升至37.1%(χ~2=24.23,P<0.01),蔬菜水果摄入充足的比例由44.6%上升至53.5%(χ~2=9.61,P<0.01),差异均具有统计学意义;对照组相应指标干预前后比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,干预组中有329人(54.2%)血压恢复到正常范围,244人(40.2%)依旧维持在高血压前期状态,34人(5.6%)转变成高血压患者。对照组中55人(16.4%)血压正常,236人(70.0%)维持高血压前期,46人(13.6%)转变成患者,两组差异有统计学意义(χ~2=130.930,P<0.01)。倍差法结果显示,干预活动使高血压前期人群收缩压下降了7.605 mmHg,舒张压下降了3.727 mmHg。结论通过2年的随访和干预,深圳市福田区干预组的高血压前期人群生活方式得到了改善,综合干预取得了较好的效果。
        OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of lifestyle intervention program among pre-hypertensive adults in Futian District, Shenzhen City. METHODS A total of 12 communities were selected randomly from Futian District, Shenzhen City between October and November of 2013. A total of 1183 pre-hypertension population was screened and divided into intervention group(834) and control group(349) according to community sources. Comprehensive intervention including reducing sodium intake, weight control and exercise, quitting smoking and limiting alcohol consumption were implemented in intervention group. The form of intervention was a combination of group activities and individual follow-up,and at least one kind of activity and follow-up was carried out every quarter. The control group did not actively provide any intervention except routine work. The evaluation survey was taken both in intervention group and control group in 2015. RESULTS In the intervention group, the proportion of oil control measures was increased from 36.6% to 55.7%(χ~2=44.71, P<0.01),the proportion of salt reduction measures was increased from 44.8% to 61.1%(χ~2=32.72, P<0.01), the regular exercise rate was increased from 24.1% to 37.1%(χ~2=24.23, P<0.01), adequate intake of fruits and vegetables rate rose from 44.6% to 53.5%(χ~2=9.61, P<0.01) after intervention. There was no statistical difference in these indicators in the control group before and after intervention(P>0.05). After intervention, the blood pressure of 329(54.2%) persons in the intervention group returned to healthy state, 244(40.2%) persons remained in the pre-hypertensive state and 34(5.6%) persons were converted to hypertensive patients. In the control group, the blood pressure of 55(16.4%) persons returned to health, 236(70.0%) persons maintain prehypertension, and 46(13.6%) persons became hypertensive patients. Compared with the two groups, the difference was statistically significant(χ~2=130.93, P<0.01). The result showed that the systolic blood pressure of the pre-hypertensive group decreased by 7.605 mmHg and the diastolic blood pressure decreased by 3.727 mmHg. CONCLUSION After 2 years of follow-up and intervention, the lifestyle of the pre-hypertension population in the intervention group has been improved. The comprehensive intervention has achieved good result.

引文

[1] CHOBANIAN A V,BAKRIS G L,BLACK H R,et al.The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention,detection,evaluation,and treatment of high blood pressure:the JNC 7 Report[J].JAMA,2003,289(4):2560-2572.
    [2] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会.中国高血压防治指南2010[J].中华高血压杂志,2011,39(8):701-708.
    [3] GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators.Global,regional,and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural,environmental and occupational,and metabolic risks or clusters of risks,1990-2015:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015[J].Lancet,2016,388(10053):1659-1724.
    [4] SURI M F K,QURESHI A I.Prehypertension as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases[J].J Cardiovasc Nurs,2006,21(6):478-482.
    [5] PARK J E,HONG S,LEE M,et al.Randomized,controlled trial of qigong for treatment of prehypertension and mild essential hypertension[J].Altern Ther Health Med,2014,20(4):21-30.
    [6] 中华人民共和国卫生部疾病控制司.中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.
    [7] 中国疾病预防控制中心.中国慢性病及其危险因素监测报告 2010[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2012.
    [8] 汪涛,金丕焕.统计方法在医学科研中的应用[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:54-55.
    [9] 扈学俸,韩笑然,杨祖耀,等.诊断切点的改变对中国高血压、高血脂、高血糖患病率的影响[J].中华预防医学杂志,2017,51(5):369-377.
    [10] 王勇,王斯,陈晓平.高血压社区管理的现状及展望[J].中华高血压杂志,2015,23 (7):630-632.
    [11] 张晨韵,蔡晓露,黄慧玲,等.我国高血压社区综合干预效果的Meta分析[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2017,21(6):627-631.
    [12] 李洋,胡洁,郭海健,等.社区高血压前期生活方式群组干预研究[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2016,20(10):971-974.
    [13] 俞蔚,杨丽,章一丰,等.社区高血压前期和高血压患者生活方式干预研究[J].中国医学前沿杂志,2015,5(7):4-8.
    [14] 韩颖萍.高血压前期中医干预研究的思路与方法[J].中医研究,2010,23(12):1-3.
    [15] WANG J,FENG B,YANG X,et al.Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of prehypertension[J].Evi Based Complement Altern Med,2013,2013:757540.
    [16] YU R,YAN L L,WANG H,et al.Effectiveness of a community-based individualized lifestyle intervention among older adults with diabetes and hypertension,Tianjin,China,2008-2009[J].Prev Chronic Dis,2014,11:E84.
    [17] ZOELLNER J,THOMSON J L,LANDRY A S,et al.Improvements in blood pressure among undiagnosed hypertensive participants in a community-based lifestyle intervention,Mississippi,2010[J].Prev Chronic Dis,2014,11:E53.