黑龙江省造林树种含碳率与土壤性质研究
|
摘要
为研究造林树种的碳汇效应,采用生长锥取样法对黑龙江省5个造林树种进行含碳率分析,并考察了含碳率与土壤性质的相关性。结果表明:5个造林树种含碳率在0.490±0.014(樟子松,S朝向)~0.439±0.018(杨树,N朝向)之间变化,在S(南)和N(北)朝向上,樟子松的含碳率均较高,其次为白桦和落叶松且含碳率相差不多,红松和杨树的含碳率较低。造林树种含碳率与土壤性质相关性研究表明:S朝向,樟子松含碳率与土壤容重呈显著正相关(R=0.571,P<0.05),与土壤总碳呈显著负相关(R=-0.552,P<0.05);白桦含碳率与土壤总碳之间呈显著正相关(R=0.558,P<0.05)。
In order to study the carbon sink effect of afforestation tree species, the carbon rate of five afforestation tree species in Heilongjiang Province was analyzed with growth cone sampling method, and the correlation between carbon rate and soil properties was investigated. The results showed that the carbon rate varied between 0.490±0.014(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, S) and 0.439±0.018(Poplar, N). On south and north orientations, the carbon rate of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolicawas higher, followed by Betula platyphylla and larch, and the carbon rate of Pinus koraiensis and Populus was low. In the south orientation, significant positive correlation was found between carbon rate and soil bulk density(R=0.571, P<0.05), while significant negative correlation was found between carbon rate and soil total carbon(R=-0.552, P<0.05) of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica; and significant positive correlation was found between carbon rate and soil total carbon(R=0.558,P<0.05) of Betula platyphylla.
In order to study the carbon sink effect of afforestation tree species, the carbon rate of five afforestation tree species in Heilongjiang Province was analyzed with growth cone sampling method, and the correlation between carbon rate and soil properties was investigated. The results showed that the carbon rate varied between 0.490±0.014(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, S) and 0.439±0.018(Poplar, N). On south and north orientations, the carbon rate of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolicawas higher, followed by Betula platyphylla and larch, and the carbon rate of Pinus koraiensis and Populus was low. In the south orientation, significant positive correlation was found between carbon rate and soil bulk density(R=0.571, P<0.05), while significant negative correlation was found between carbon rate and soil total carbon(R=-0.552, P<0.05) of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica; and significant positive correlation was found between carbon rate and soil total carbon(R=0.558,P<0.05) of Betula platyphylla.
引文
[1]魏晓华,郑吉,刘国华,等.人工林碳汇潜力新概念及应用[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(12):3881-3885.Wei X H, Zheng J, Liu G H, et al. The concept and application of carbon sequestration potentials in plantation forests[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(12):3881-3885.
[2]马钦彦,陈遐林,王娟,等.华北主要森林类型建群种的含碳率分析[J].北京林业大学学报, 2002, 24(5/6):96-100.Ma Q Y, Chen X L, Wang J, et al. Carbon content rate in constructive species of main forest types in northern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2002, 24(5/6):96-100.
[3]李春平,吴斌,张宇清,等.山东郓城农田防护林杨树器官含碳率分析[J].北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(2):74-78.Li C P, Wu B, Zhang Y Q, et al. Carbon content of poplar in shelterbelt at Yuncheng County, Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(2):74-78.
[4]孙清芳,刘滨凡,韩丽冬,等.阔叶红松林细根分布及周转[J].森林与环境学报, 2016, 36(4):449-454.Sun Q F, Liu B F, Han L D, et al. Vertical distribution and turnover of fine roots in broad-leaved Korean pine forest[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2016, 36(4):449-454.
[5]张薇,付昀,李季芳,等.基于凯氏定氮法与杜马斯燃烧法测定土壤全氮的比较研究[J].中国农学通报, 2015, 31(35):172-175.Zhang W, Fu Y, Li J F, et al. Comparative study on Kjeldahl methodandDumascombustionmethodfortotalnitrogen measurement in soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2015, 31(35):172-175.
[6]杨旭东.贵州省东南部常见森林类型含碳率分析[J].贵州林业科技, 2015, 43(3):9-14.Yang X D. Carbon content of common forest types in southeastern Guizhou Province[J]. Guizhou Forestry Science and Technology,2015, 43(3):9-14.
[7]张萍.北京森林碳储量研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009.Zhang P. Study on forest carbon stock in Beijing of China[D].Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2009.
[8]唐宵,黄从德,张健,等.四川主要针叶树种的含碳率测定分析[J].四川林业科技, 2007, 28(2):20-23.Tang X, Huang C D, Zhang J, et al. An analysis of the carbon content rate in main coniferous species in Sichuan[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2007, 28(2):20-23.
[9]黄从德,张健,杨万勤,等.四川省及重庆地区森林植被碳储量动态[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(3):966-975.Huang C D, Zhang J, Yang W Q, et al. Dynamics on forest carbon stock in Sichuan Province and Chongqing City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(3):966-975.
[10]季波,何建龙,李娜,等.宁夏贺兰山主要森林树种的含碳率分析[J].水土保持通报, 2015, 35(2):332-335.Ji B, He J L, Li N, et al. Carbon content rate analysis in main tree species of forest in Helan Mountain of Ningxia area[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2):332-335.
[11]刘维,张晓丽,马菁.鹫峰国家森林公园主要乔木树种含碳率分析[J].西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(5):214-218.Liu W, Zhang X L, Ma J. Carbon content rate analysis on the main arbor species in Jiufeng National Forest Park[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2011, 26(5):214-218.
[12]李峰,王力刚,刘文环.黑龙江省典型森林类型主要树种及林地土壤含碳率测定研究[J].防护林科技, 2013(11):8-10.Li F, Wang L G, Liu W H, et al. Determination of carbon content rate in the main tree species and wood land soil of typical forest types in Heilongjiang province[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2013,(11):8-10.
[13]王金亮,王小花,岳彩荣,等.滇西北香格里拉森林4个建群种的含碳率[J].生态环境学报, 2012, 21(4):613-619.Wang J L, Wang X H, Yue C R, et al. Carbon content rate in dominant species of four forest types in Shangri-la, northwest Yunnan province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2012, 21(4):613-619.
[14]罗艳,唐才富,辛文荣,等.青海省云杉属(Picea)和圆柏属(Sabina)乔木含碳率分析[J].生态环境学报2014, 23(11):1764-1768.Luo Y, Tang C F, Xin W R, et al. Carbon content rate of Picea and Sabina trees in Qinghai Province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 23(11):1764-1768.
[15]张平.不同造林树种对盐碱地土壤理化性质的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学, 2014.Zhang P. Effect of different afforestation tree species on soil physical and chemical properties of saline-alkali soil[D].Taian:Shangdong Agriculture University, 2014.
[16]路嘉丽.基于树种影响土壤差异的造林树种选择初步研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2016.Lu J L. A preliminary study on afforestation tree species selection based tree species effects on soil properties[D]. Harbin:Northeast Forestry University, 2016.
[17]万晓华,黄志群,何宗明,等.杉木采伐迹地造林树种转变对土壤可溶性有机质的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2014, 25(1):12-18.Wan X H, Huang Z Q, He Z M, et al. Effects of tree species transfer on soil dissolved organic matter pools in a reforested Chinese fir(Cunninghamia lanceolata)woodland[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(1):12-18.
[2]马钦彦,陈遐林,王娟,等.华北主要森林类型建群种的含碳率分析[J].北京林业大学学报, 2002, 24(5/6):96-100.Ma Q Y, Chen X L, Wang J, et al. Carbon content rate in constructive species of main forest types in northern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2002, 24(5/6):96-100.
[3]李春平,吴斌,张宇清,等.山东郓城农田防护林杨树器官含碳率分析[J].北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(2):74-78.Li C P, Wu B, Zhang Y Q, et al. Carbon content of poplar in shelterbelt at Yuncheng County, Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(2):74-78.
[4]孙清芳,刘滨凡,韩丽冬,等.阔叶红松林细根分布及周转[J].森林与环境学报, 2016, 36(4):449-454.Sun Q F, Liu B F, Han L D, et al. Vertical distribution and turnover of fine roots in broad-leaved Korean pine forest[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2016, 36(4):449-454.
[5]张薇,付昀,李季芳,等.基于凯氏定氮法与杜马斯燃烧法测定土壤全氮的比较研究[J].中国农学通报, 2015, 31(35):172-175.Zhang W, Fu Y, Li J F, et al. Comparative study on Kjeldahl methodandDumascombustionmethodfortotalnitrogen measurement in soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2015, 31(35):172-175.
[6]杨旭东.贵州省东南部常见森林类型含碳率分析[J].贵州林业科技, 2015, 43(3):9-14.Yang X D. Carbon content of common forest types in southeastern Guizhou Province[J]. Guizhou Forestry Science and Technology,2015, 43(3):9-14.
[7]张萍.北京森林碳储量研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009.Zhang P. Study on forest carbon stock in Beijing of China[D].Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2009.
[8]唐宵,黄从德,张健,等.四川主要针叶树种的含碳率测定分析[J].四川林业科技, 2007, 28(2):20-23.Tang X, Huang C D, Zhang J, et al. An analysis of the carbon content rate in main coniferous species in Sichuan[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2007, 28(2):20-23.
[9]黄从德,张健,杨万勤,等.四川省及重庆地区森林植被碳储量动态[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(3):966-975.Huang C D, Zhang J, Yang W Q, et al. Dynamics on forest carbon stock in Sichuan Province and Chongqing City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(3):966-975.
[10]季波,何建龙,李娜,等.宁夏贺兰山主要森林树种的含碳率分析[J].水土保持通报, 2015, 35(2):332-335.Ji B, He J L, Li N, et al. Carbon content rate analysis in main tree species of forest in Helan Mountain of Ningxia area[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2):332-335.
[11]刘维,张晓丽,马菁.鹫峰国家森林公园主要乔木树种含碳率分析[J].西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(5):214-218.Liu W, Zhang X L, Ma J. Carbon content rate analysis on the main arbor species in Jiufeng National Forest Park[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2011, 26(5):214-218.
[12]李峰,王力刚,刘文环.黑龙江省典型森林类型主要树种及林地土壤含碳率测定研究[J].防护林科技, 2013(11):8-10.Li F, Wang L G, Liu W H, et al. Determination of carbon content rate in the main tree species and wood land soil of typical forest types in Heilongjiang province[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2013,(11):8-10.
[13]王金亮,王小花,岳彩荣,等.滇西北香格里拉森林4个建群种的含碳率[J].生态环境学报, 2012, 21(4):613-619.Wang J L, Wang X H, Yue C R, et al. Carbon content rate in dominant species of four forest types in Shangri-la, northwest Yunnan province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2012, 21(4):613-619.
[14]罗艳,唐才富,辛文荣,等.青海省云杉属(Picea)和圆柏属(Sabina)乔木含碳率分析[J].生态环境学报2014, 23(11):1764-1768.Luo Y, Tang C F, Xin W R, et al. Carbon content rate of Picea and Sabina trees in Qinghai Province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 23(11):1764-1768.
[15]张平.不同造林树种对盐碱地土壤理化性质的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学, 2014.Zhang P. Effect of different afforestation tree species on soil physical and chemical properties of saline-alkali soil[D].Taian:Shangdong Agriculture University, 2014.
[16]路嘉丽.基于树种影响土壤差异的造林树种选择初步研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2016.Lu J L. A preliminary study on afforestation tree species selection based tree species effects on soil properties[D]. Harbin:Northeast Forestry University, 2016.
[17]万晓华,黄志群,何宗明,等.杉木采伐迹地造林树种转变对土壤可溶性有机质的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2014, 25(1):12-18.Wan X H, Huang Z Q, He Z M, et al. Effects of tree species transfer on soil dissolved organic matter pools in a reforested Chinese fir(Cunninghamia lanceolata)woodland[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(1):12-18.