用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于淋巴结分期评分的胰腺癌手术淋巴结清扫数目探讨(附四中心临床研究结果)
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The adequate number of lymph node dissection in pancreatic cancer radical surgery based on nodal staging score(with four-center cohort validation)
  • 作者:任泰 ; 郭世伟 ; 王伟珅 ; 王单松 ; 王铮 ; 杨洋 ; 邵子雨 ; 赵安达 ; 束翌俊 ; 王许安 ; 李生慧 ; 张熙 ; 金钢 ; 沈柏用 ; 楼文晖 ; 刘颖斌
  • 英文作者:REN Tai;GUO Shi-wei;WANG Wei-shen;Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research;
  • 关键词:胰腺癌 ; 肿瘤分期 ; 淋巴结 ; 假阴性率
  • 英文关键词:pancreatic cancer;;tumor stage;;lymph node;;false-negative rate
  • 中文刊名:ZGWK
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery
  • 机构:上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普外科 上海市胆道疾病研究重点实验室 上海市胆道疾病研究中心;海军军医大学第一附属医院胰腺外科;上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院胰腺外科;复旦大学附属中山医院普外科;上海交通大学医学院公共卫生学院;上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院临床研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 出版单位:中国实用外科杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金国际合作与交流项目(No.31620103910);; 上海市级医院新兴前沿技术项目(No.SHDC12014109)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZGWK201906017
  • 页数:6
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:21-1331/R
  • 分类号:68-73
摘要
目的探讨胰腺癌淋巴结准确分期所需清扫的淋巴结数目。方法回顾性分析美国SEER数据库中3989例切除的胰腺癌淋巴结阳性病人资料并进行建模,得到淋巴结分期评分达到90%时所需的淋巴结清扫数目作为推荐值,并利用SEER数据库2583例与国内93例淋巴结阴性病人进行生存分析验证结果。结果肿瘤最大径<2 cm是胰腺癌淋巴结清扫数量的影响因素。预期对阴性结果达到90%把握时,肿瘤最大径<2 cm的病人需要活检15枚淋巴结,而≥2 cm的病人需要活检20枚。校正假阴性病人后,淋巴结阳性率从60.7%升至71.0%。生存分析提示肿瘤最大径≥2 cm病人中,淋巴结分期评分与生存有相关性(P=0.002)。结论肿瘤最大径是决定胰腺癌淋巴结清扫数量的因素。根据淋巴结分期评分,推荐清扫更多淋巴结。
        Objective To estimate the number of lymph nodes(LNs)needed to be examined for adequate LN staging via nodal staging score(NSS).Methods A model was fitted based on 3989 pN + patients with resected primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the Surveillance,Epidemiology and End Results(SEER)database.The number of nodes to examine to achieve an N SS of 90% was used as the optimal number.The results were validated in node negative patients from the SEER cohort(2583 patients)and a local multicenter cohort(93 patients).Results Tumor size is a determinant for the extent of lymphadenectomy.According to the tumor size<2 cm and ≥2 cm,15 and 20 LNs would need to be examined to achieve90% confidence in a pN0 patient.As a result of missing node-positive case,the prevalence of nodepositive was adjusted from 60.7% to 71.0%.In the survival analysis,more LNs examined was shown to be correlated with better prognosis in patients with tumor ≥2 cm.Conclusion The minimum number of LNs for adequate staging depends on the tumor size.The estimation provides a practical standard for evaluating the extent of LN yield for surgeons.
引文
[1]彭淑牖,刘颖斌.胰腺癌根治性切除的有关问题[J].中国实用外科杂志,2004,24(5):266-268.
    [2]赵玉沛.胰十二指肠切除术现状与展望[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(8):817-820.
    [3]Bochner BH,Hansel DE,Efstathiou JA,et al.AJCC Cancer Staging Manual[M].8th Edition.Chicago:Springer,2017:337-347.
    [4]Tol JA,Gouma DJ,Bassi C,et al.Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma:a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery(ISGPS)[J].Surgery,2014,156(3):591-600.
    [5]Schwarz RE,Smith DD.Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival:information from a large US population database[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2006,13(9):1189-2000.
    [6]Mirkin KA,Hollenbeak CS,Wong J.Greater lymph node retrieval and lymph node ratio impacts survival in resected pancreatic cancer[J].J Surg Res,2017,220:12-24.
    [7]Showalter TN,Winter KA,Berger AC,et al.The influence of total nodes examined,number of positive nodes,and lymph node ratio on survival after surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer:a secondary analysis of RTOG 9704[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2011,81(5):1328-1335.
    [8]Ashfaq A,Pockaj BA,Gray RJ,et al.Nodal counts and lymph node ratio impact survival after distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2014,18(11):1929-1935.
    [9]Tomlinson JS,Jain S,Bentrem DJ,et al.Accuracy of staging node-negative pancreas cancer:a potential quality measure[J].Arch Surg,2007,142(8):767-723.
    [10]Valsangkar NP,Bush DM,Michaelson JS,et al.N0/N1,PNL,or LNR?The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2013,17(2):257-266.
    [11]刘颖斌,吴文广.胰腺癌淋巴结清扫范围的探讨[J].上海医学,2010,33(11):986-988.
    [12]G?nen M,Schrag D,Weiser MR.Nodal staging score:a tool to assess adequate staging of node-negative colon cancer[J].JClin Oncol,2009,27(36):6166-6171.
    [13]Robinson TJ,Thomas S,Dinan MA,et al.Howmany lymph nodes are enough?assessing the adequacy of lymph node yield for papillary thyroid cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2016,34(28):3434-3439.
    [14]Yeo CJ,Cameron JL,Lillemoe KD,et al.Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma,part 2:randomized controlled trial evaluating survival,morbidity,and mortality[J].Ann Surg,2002,236(3):355-366.
    [15]Nimura Y,Nagino M,Takao S,et al.Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas:long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial[J].JHepatobiliary Pancreat Sci,2012,19(3):230-241.
    [16]刘颖斌,吴文广.胰腺全系膜切除理念争议及评价[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(8):836-838.
    [17]吴文广,吴向嵩,李茂岚,等.胰头癌行胰腺全系膜切除75例报告[J].中国实用外科杂志,2013,33(10):859-862.
    [18]Hirata K,Sato T,Mukaiya M,et al.Results of 1001 pancreatic resections for invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas[J].Arch Surg,1997,132(7):771-777.
    [19]Huebner M,Kendrick M,Reid-Lombardo KM,et al.Number of lymph nodes evaluated:prognostic value in pancreatic adenocarcinoma[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2012,16(5):920-926.
    [20]洪德飞,刘颖斌,彭淑牖.如何提高胰头癌根治的彻底性和安全性[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2010,16(2):88-91.
    [21]Contreras CM,Lin CP,Oster RA,et al.Increased pancreatic cancer survival with greater lymph node retrieval in the National Cancer Data Base[J].Am J Surg,2017,214(3):442-449.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700