唐宋变革视阈下刑法类典籍编纂的历史嬗变
|
摘要
唐中叶至北宋时期,国家和社会状况发生了一系列的重要变化。而在唐宋变革的历史背景下,具体到刑法类图书典籍的编纂特点,则有着丰富多样的流变。如果将唐宋时期刑法类图书典籍置于唐宋变革的历史空间中,能够以点带面形成一个长时段、多维度的观测视角。以往我们注重印刷术带给宋代图书典籍出版的数量变化,但却弱化了图书典籍在内容上的蜕变。更重要的是,假以唐宋变革作为刑法类图书典籍发展区间的话,那么北宋时期的"技道两进"无疑突显着对唐中叶五代以降的成果继承和重大革新。而对唐宋变革刑法类图书典籍编纂特点的考察,又必将助推我们对唐宋变革理论得出更立体的历史观感,从而促成富有穿透性的分析和解答。
From the middle of the Tang Dynasty to the Northern Song Dynasty,a series of important changes took place in the state and society. In the historical context of the Tang and Song reforms,the specific characteristics of the compilation of criminal law books underwent a variety of changes as well. If the books of the criminal law books of the Tang and Song Dynasties were placed in the historical space of the Tang and Song reforms,they could form a long-term,multidimensional observational perspective. In the past,we only paid attention to the change in the number of books published in the Song dynasty by printing,which weakened the changes in the content of the books. More importantly,if the changes in the Tang and Song dynasties were used as the developmental scope of criminal law books,then the "two advances of tactics"in the Northern Song Dynasty undoubtedly highlighted the succession and significant innovation of the achievements of the Tang and the Five Dynasties. The examination of the characteristics of the edition of the criminal law books in the Tang and Song dynasties will inevitably help us to have a more three-dimensional historical perspective on the Tang and Song dynasty transformation theories,thereby facilitating thorough analysis and answers.
From the middle of the Tang Dynasty to the Northern Song Dynasty,a series of important changes took place in the state and society. In the historical context of the Tang and Song reforms,the specific characteristics of the compilation of criminal law books underwent a variety of changes as well. If the books of the criminal law books of the Tang and Song Dynasties were placed in the historical space of the Tang and Song reforms,they could form a long-term,multidimensional observational perspective. In the past,we only paid attention to the change in the number of books published in the Song dynasty by printing,which weakened the changes in the content of the books. More importantly,if the changes in the Tang and Song dynasties were used as the developmental scope of criminal law books,then the "two advances of tactics"in the Northern Song Dynasty undoubtedly highlighted the succession and significant innovation of the achievements of the Tang and the Five Dynasties. The examination of the characteristics of the edition of the criminal law books in the Tang and Song dynasties will inevitably help us to have a more three-dimensional historical perspective on the Tang and Song dynasty transformation theories,thereby facilitating thorough analysis and answers.
引文
[1]钱存训.中国古代书史[M].香港:香港中文大学出版社,1975.
[2]刘宁慧.唐宋图书编纂型态的转变与丛书生成之关系[A].海峡两岸古典文献学学术研讨会论文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
[3]内藤虎次郎.概括的唐宋时代观[M].东洋文化史研究.东京:弘文堂书房,1948.
[4]仁井田陞.唐宋法律文书の研究[M].东京:东方文化学院东京研究所,1937.
[5]宫崎市定.中国史[M].焦堃,瞿柘如,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2015.
[6]林文勋.商品经济:唐宋社会变革的根本力量[J].文史哲,2005,(1).
[7]戴建国.唐宋法律史论集[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2007.
[8]柳立言.何谓“唐宋变革”?[J].中华文史论丛,2006,(1).
[9]戴建国.“主仆名分”与宋代奴婢的法律地位——唐宋变革时期阶级结构研究之一[J].历史研究,2004,(4).
[10]戴建国.唐宋变革时期的法律与社会[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[11]毕巍明.“唐宋变革论”及其对法律史研究的意义[J].法治论丛,2011,(4).
[12]高明士.从律令制的演变看唐宋间的变革[J].台大历史学报,2003,(32).
[13]高明士.律令法与天下法[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.
[14]高明士.“天圣令学”与唐宋变革[J].汉学研究,2013,(1).
[15]脱脱.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
[16]杨鸿烈.中国法律发达史[M].范忠信,郑智,李可,校勘.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2009.
[17]李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
[18]孙岳颁.佩文斋书画谱(卷77)历代名人书跋八·宋秦观草书帖[A].影印文渊阁《四库全书》第822册[M].台北:商务印书馆,1986.
[2]刘宁慧.唐宋图书编纂型态的转变与丛书生成之关系[A].海峡两岸古典文献学学术研讨会论文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
[3]内藤虎次郎.概括的唐宋时代观[M].东洋文化史研究.东京:弘文堂书房,1948.
[4]仁井田陞.唐宋法律文书の研究[M].东京:东方文化学院东京研究所,1937.
[5]宫崎市定.中国史[M].焦堃,瞿柘如,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2015.
[6]林文勋.商品经济:唐宋社会变革的根本力量[J].文史哲,2005,(1).
[7]戴建国.唐宋法律史论集[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2007.
[8]柳立言.何谓“唐宋变革”?[J].中华文史论丛,2006,(1).
[9]戴建国.“主仆名分”与宋代奴婢的法律地位——唐宋变革时期阶级结构研究之一[J].历史研究,2004,(4).
[10]戴建国.唐宋变革时期的法律与社会[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
[11]毕巍明.“唐宋变革论”及其对法律史研究的意义[J].法治论丛,2011,(4).
[12]高明士.从律令制的演变看唐宋间的变革[J].台大历史学报,2003,(32).
[13]高明士.律令法与天下法[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.
[14]高明士.“天圣令学”与唐宋变革[J].汉学研究,2013,(1).
[15]脱脱.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
[16]杨鸿烈.中国法律发达史[M].范忠信,郑智,李可,校勘.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2009.
[17]李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
[18]孙岳颁.佩文斋书画谱(卷77)历代名人书跋八·宋秦观草书帖[A].影印文渊阁《四库全书》第822册[M].台北:商务印书馆,1986.