摘要
执行和解的效力直接决定执行和解的运行,民事诉讼法未对执行和解效力进行界分,应否赋予执行和解以强制执行力学界未有定论。通过对执行和解性质的界分,执行和解性质为不可诉的私法行为,执行和解的效力应当具有不可诉的合同效力,故其不应具有强制执行力,我国《合同法》《民事诉讼法》应当作出相应修改。
The effect of the implementation of conciliation directly decides the operation of the conciliation.The civil procedure law does not demarcate the effect of the implementation of the settlement. By defining the boundary of the nature of the execution reconciliation, this article holds that the nature of the execution reconciliation is an private law behavior and the effect of the execution reconciliation shall not be contract effect Therefore, it should not have compulsory execution. China's Contract Law and the Code of Civil Procedure Law shall be amended accordingly.
引文
[1]童兆洪.民事强制执行新论[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2001.
[2]徐继军.论执行和解协议的效力与性质[J].法律适用,2006,(9):36.
[3]程波.论民事执行程序[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007.
[4]雷运龙.民事执行和解制度的理论基础[J].政法论坛,2010,(6):12.
[5]德国民事诉讼法[M].丁启明,译.厦门:厦门大学出版社,2016.
[6]日本民事诉讼法[M].曹云吉,译.厦门:厦门大学出版社,2017.
[7]陈群峰,雷运龙.论民事执行和解司法审查的本质、功能与效力[J].法学家,2013,(6):156.
[8]林道晴,太田秀哉,上石奈绪,等.ライブ争点整理[M].东京:有斐阁,2014.
[9]史明洲.执行和解的法解释论展开—《民事诉讼法》第230条评注[J].当代法学,2017,(1):146-147.
[10]山木户可己.當事者の訴訟上の地位—當事者平等原則の展開[M].講座民訴(三),1984.
[11]鄢焱.再论执行和解—以执行和解协议的性质论争为中心展开[J].河北法学,2016,(4):184.
[12]刘东.论民事执行和解协议效力的完善[J].时代法学,2013,(5):59.
[13]曹凤国.民事执行和解协议效力的困境与出路—以民事诉讼法第二百三十条为切入点[J].人民司法,2013,(15):107.