服务国家特殊需求项目博士生培养质量评价体系构建研究
|
摘要
国内对学术型、专业型博士生培养质量评价形成了比较一致的认识,通过构建多样化评价指标,运用数理分析等实证方法进行了评价,但目前缺乏对服务国家特殊需求博士人才培养质量的评价;分析了服务国家特殊需求项目人才培养的特殊性,依据相关原则,构建了人才培养的3个一级指标,13个二级指标,42个观测点,并对指标选取依据给予了说明,确立了指标权重的赋值方法及TOPSIS评价方法,以展开对人才培养质量的评价。
Quality evaluation for academic-style and specialized PhD candidate cultivation has comparatively consistent recognition at home,mathematical methods by constructing multiple evaluation indexes are used to evaluate the quality but there is short of the evaluation on the PhD candidates serving national specially-needed projects. This paper analyzes the particularity for cultivating national specially-needed talents,constructs three primary indexes,thirteen indexes and forty-two observing points for talent cultivation based on the relative principles,makes explanation for index selection,and establishes evaluating method for index weights and TOPSIS evaluation method.
Quality evaluation for academic-style and specialized PhD candidate cultivation has comparatively consistent recognition at home,mathematical methods by constructing multiple evaluation indexes are used to evaluate the quality but there is short of the evaluation on the PhD candidates serving national specially-needed projects. This paper analyzes the particularity for cultivating national specially-needed talents,constructs three primary indexes,thirteen indexes and forty-two observing points for talent cultivation based on the relative principles,makes explanation for index selection,and establishes evaluating method for index weights and TOPSIS evaluation method.
引文
[1]陈洪捷,赵世奎,沈文欸,等.中国博士培养质量:成就、问题与对策[J].学位与研究生教育,2011(6):40-45CHEN H J,ZHAO S K,FAN W Q,et al. China Doctor Candidate Cultivation Quality,Problems and Countermeasures[J]. Degree and Graduate Education,2011(6):40-45
[2]沈文钦.博士培养质量评价:概念、方法与视角[J].北京大学教育评论,2009(2):48-59SHEN W Q. Doctor Candidate Cultivation Quality Evaluation:Concept, Method and Perspective[J].Education Review of Peking University,2009(2):48-59
[3]樊建平,刘建煌.关于提高博士研究生培养质量的几点思考[J].教育与现代化,2010(1):84-89FAN J P,LIU J H. Several Ideas on How to Promote Doctor Candidate Cultivation Quality[J]. Education and Modernization,2010(1):84-89
[4]马明霞.培养高质量博士生的实践逻辑:基于全国百篇优博论文获得者对博士阶段的回溯评价[J].研究生教育研究,2014(4):32-33MA M X. Practical Logic for Cultivating High Quality Doctor Candidates:Evaluation Based on the Review of Doctor Candidate Period of Top 100 Excellent Doctor Candidate Thesis Winners[J]. Graduate Education Research,2014(4):32-33
[5]扈国栋.军医大学临床医学博士质量追踪评价指标体系的构建及应用[J].学位与研究生教育,2014(7):56-60HU G D. Construction of Quality Tracing Evaluation Index System for Military Clinic Medical Universities[J].Degree and Graduate Education,2014(7):56-60
[6]吴欣.我国体育学博士培养质量评价指标体系构建[J].广州体育学院学报,2017(2):116-119WU X. Construction of Quality Evaluation Index System for Sports Doctor Candidate Cultivation in China[J]. Journal of Guangzhou Physical Education College,2017(2):116-119
[7]李雪梅.博士生导师人才培养质量评价体系研究:基于理工科博士生学术成果质量的视角[J].学位与研究生教育,2017(5):30-31LI X M. Research on Quality Evaluation System for Talent Cultivation of Doctor Candidate Mentors:Based on the Perspective of Academic Results Quality of the Doctor Candidates Majoring in Science and Technology[J].Degree and Graduate Education,2017(6):30-31
[8]薛子帅.跨学科博士生培养质量评价指标体系的建构与应用研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2015XUE Z S. Construction of Quality Evaluation System for Trans-discipline Doctor Candidate Cultivation[D].Wuhan:Huazhong University for Science and Technology,2015
[9]赵世奎.博士培养质量评价的差异性分析[J].北京大学教育评论,2009(2):61-62ZHAO S K. Analysis of the Difference in Doctor Candidate Cultivation Quality Evaluation[J]. Education Review of Peking University,2009(2):61-62
[10]沈华.博士培养质量的模糊综合评价[J].北京大学教育评论,2009(2):67-74SHEN H. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation on Doctor Candidate Cultivation Quality[J]. Education Review of Peking University,2009(2):67-74
[11]马黎.中美研究型博士生培养模式比较研究[J].高等教育研究,1994(1):69-74MA L. Comparative Research On Research Style Doctor Candidate Cultivation Model Between the United States and China[J]. Higher Education Research,1994(1):69-74
[12] ROWLEY J. Is Higher Education Ready for Knowledge Management[J]. The Internation of Journal of Education Management,2003(3):92-96
[13] SAATY T L. The analytic Hierarchy Process:Planning,Priority Setting,Resources Allocation[M]. New York:McGraw,1980
[14]熊兴,余兴厚,陈伟.三峡库区基本公共服务水平的空间差异[J].技术经济,2016,35(8):99-105XIONG X,YU X H,CHEN W. Spatial Difference in Basic Public Service Level of Three Gorges Area[J].Technical Economy,2016,35(8):99-105
[2]沈文钦.博士培养质量评价:概念、方法与视角[J].北京大学教育评论,2009(2):48-59SHEN W Q. Doctor Candidate Cultivation Quality Evaluation:Concept, Method and Perspective[J].Education Review of Peking University,2009(2):48-59
[3]樊建平,刘建煌.关于提高博士研究生培养质量的几点思考[J].教育与现代化,2010(1):84-89FAN J P,LIU J H. Several Ideas on How to Promote Doctor Candidate Cultivation Quality[J]. Education and Modernization,2010(1):84-89
[4]马明霞.培养高质量博士生的实践逻辑:基于全国百篇优博论文获得者对博士阶段的回溯评价[J].研究生教育研究,2014(4):32-33MA M X. Practical Logic for Cultivating High Quality Doctor Candidates:Evaluation Based on the Review of Doctor Candidate Period of Top 100 Excellent Doctor Candidate Thesis Winners[J]. Graduate Education Research,2014(4):32-33
[5]扈国栋.军医大学临床医学博士质量追踪评价指标体系的构建及应用[J].学位与研究生教育,2014(7):56-60HU G D. Construction of Quality Tracing Evaluation Index System for Military Clinic Medical Universities[J].Degree and Graduate Education,2014(7):56-60
[6]吴欣.我国体育学博士培养质量评价指标体系构建[J].广州体育学院学报,2017(2):116-119WU X. Construction of Quality Evaluation Index System for Sports Doctor Candidate Cultivation in China[J]. Journal of Guangzhou Physical Education College,2017(2):116-119
[7]李雪梅.博士生导师人才培养质量评价体系研究:基于理工科博士生学术成果质量的视角[J].学位与研究生教育,2017(5):30-31LI X M. Research on Quality Evaluation System for Talent Cultivation of Doctor Candidate Mentors:Based on the Perspective of Academic Results Quality of the Doctor Candidates Majoring in Science and Technology[J].Degree and Graduate Education,2017(6):30-31
[8]薛子帅.跨学科博士生培养质量评价指标体系的建构与应用研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2015XUE Z S. Construction of Quality Evaluation System for Trans-discipline Doctor Candidate Cultivation[D].Wuhan:Huazhong University for Science and Technology,2015
[9]赵世奎.博士培养质量评价的差异性分析[J].北京大学教育评论,2009(2):61-62ZHAO S K. Analysis of the Difference in Doctor Candidate Cultivation Quality Evaluation[J]. Education Review of Peking University,2009(2):61-62
[10]沈华.博士培养质量的模糊综合评价[J].北京大学教育评论,2009(2):67-74SHEN H. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation on Doctor Candidate Cultivation Quality[J]. Education Review of Peking University,2009(2):67-74
[11]马黎.中美研究型博士生培养模式比较研究[J].高等教育研究,1994(1):69-74MA L. Comparative Research On Research Style Doctor Candidate Cultivation Model Between the United States and China[J]. Higher Education Research,1994(1):69-74
[12] ROWLEY J. Is Higher Education Ready for Knowledge Management[J]. The Internation of Journal of Education Management,2003(3):92-96
[13] SAATY T L. The analytic Hierarchy Process:Planning,Priority Setting,Resources Allocation[M]. New York:McGraw,1980
[14]熊兴,余兴厚,陈伟.三峡库区基本公共服务水平的空间差异[J].技术经济,2016,35(8):99-105XIONG X,YU X H,CHEN W. Spatial Difference in Basic Public Service Level of Three Gorges Area[J].Technical Economy,2016,35(8):99-105