用户名: 密码: 验证码:
粤北阔叶人工林和次生林植物多样性与土壤理化性质相关性研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Correlation Analyses on Plant Diversity and Soil Physical-Chemical Properties between Evergreen Broad-Leaved Plantations and Natural Secondary Forests in North Guangdong, China
  • 作者:闫玮明 ; 孙冰 ; 裴男才 ; 王旭 ; 李非凡 ; 罗鑫华 ; 邹滨
  • 英文作者:YAN Weiming;SUN Bing;PEI Nancai;WANG Xu;LI Feifan;LUO Xinhua;ZOU Bin;Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry;Management Office of Yangdongshan Shierdushui Nature Reserve;Management Office of Dayaosan Nature Reserve;
  • 关键词:人工林 ; 天然次生林 ; 林下物种多样性 ; 土壤理化性质 ; 物种组成
  • 英文关键词:artificial plantation;;natural secondary forest;;understory species diversity;;physical and chemical properties of soil;;species composition
  • 中文刊名:TRYJ
  • 英文刊名:Ecology and Environmental Sciences
  • 机构:中国林业科学研究院热带林业研究所;广东乐昌杨东山十二度水省级自然保护区管理处;乐昌大瑶山省级自然保护区管理处;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-18
  • 出版单位:生态环境学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.28
  • 基金:国家重点研发课题(2017YFC0505606);; 国家自然科学基金项目(31570594)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TRYJ201905006
  • 页数:10
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:44-1661/X
  • 分类号:46-55
摘要
为提升人工林林分质量,发挥人工林生态效益,以亚热带优良乡土树种壳斗科红锥(Castanopsis hystrix)、乐昌含笑(Michelia chapensis)、深山含笑(Michelia maudiae)人工林和天然次生林为研究对象,分析不同林分林下物种数量、物种多样性指数(Shannon-Wiener指数,Simpson优势度指数,Pielou均匀度指数,Margalef丰富度指数)和土壤理化性质等指标及其差异,明确土壤中制约人工林林下植被多样性的理化性质指标。结果表明,(1)灌木层中,红锥与含笑人工林林下植被Shannon-Wiener指数(1.61±0.51,1.23±0.30)低于天然次生林(1.95±0.40),且二者林下物种成分与天然次生林有显著差异,人工林植物优势种以(Maesa japonica)、石楠藤(Piper puberulum)为主,天然林优势种以广东润楠(Machilus kwangtungensis)、黧蒴锥(Castanopsis fissa)等乔木幼苗为主。草本层红锥与含笑人工林的Shannon-Wiener指数(2.55±0.50,2.53±0.31)高于天然次生林(2.34±0.38)。(2)0-20 cm土层内,有机质、全氮、全磷含量均表现为红锥人工林[(34.74±13.29)g·kg~(-1),(1.56±0.49)g·kg~(-1),(0.43±0.13)g·kg~(-1)]>含笑人工林[(28.20±9.97)g·kg~(-1),(1.27±0.34)g·kg~(-1),(0.30±0.10)g·kg~(-1)]>天然次生林[(22.78±8.52)g·kg~(-1),(1.07±0.33)g·kg~(-1),(0.25±0.04)g·kg~(-1)];20-40 cm土层内,人工林与天然林土壤有机质、全氮、全磷仍表现为红锥人工林[(24.22±7.51)g·kg~(-1),(1.23±0.32)g·kg~(-1),(0.42±0.11)g·kg~(-1)]>含笑人工林[(21.80±8.34)g·kg~(-1),(1.04±0.28)g·kg~(-1),(0.29±0.11)g·kg~(-1)]>天然次生林[(16.15±6.42)g·kg~(-1),(0.83±0.23)g·kg~(-1),(0.24±0.04)g·kg~(-1)]。除硝态氮外,其余土壤理化性质均因林分类型不同而呈现显著差异(P<0.05)。(3)有机质、氮、磷三者是影响林下植被多样性的关键因子。土壤有机质含量与林下植被多样性的相关性最强(P<0.05),氮、磷含量与草本层的相关性显著(P<0.05),草本层与灌木层相比,更易受到土壤理化性质的影响。
        In order to improve forest quality and to explore ecological benefits of the artificial plantations, this paper selected three artificial plantations dominated by native tree species(i.e., Castanopsis hystrix, Michelia chapensis, and Michelia maudiae) and natural secondary forests as the research objects in the subtropical area. The paper also compared the species number of understory,four species diversity indexes(Shannon-Wiener index, Simpson index, Pielou index, and Margalef index), and soil physical-chemical properties among these four forest stands, and identified the physical-chemical properties of soils that potentially restricted the diversity of undergrowth vegetation. The results showed that:(1) After a 16-year recover since basic tending measures taken in the early stage of plantation, in the shrub layer, the Shannon-Wiener index of artificial plantations(1.61±0.51, 1.23±0.30) was still significantly lower compared with natural secondary forest(1.95±0.40). The species composition of the artificial plantations was significantly different from that of natural secondary forest. The dominant species of artificial plantations were Maesa japonica and Piper puberulum, but in natural secondary forests were Machilus kwangtungensis and Castanopsis fissa. In herb layer, the Shannon-Wiener index of artificial plantations(2.55±0.50, 2.53±0.31) were higher compared with natural secondary forest(2.34±0.38).(2) In 0-20 cm soil depth, the content of organic matter, total nitrogen and total phosphorus was characterized by Castanopsis hystrix plantation [(34.74±13.29) g·kg~(-1),(1.56±0.49) g·kg~(-1), and(0.43±0.13) g·kg~(-1)]>Michelia plantation [(28.20±9.97)g·kg~(-1),(1.27±0.34) g·kg~(-1), and(0.30±0.10) g·kg~(-1)]>natural secondary forest [(22.78±8.52) g·kg~(-1),(1.07±0.33) g·kg~(-1), and(0.25±0.04) g·kg~(-1)]. In 20-40 cm soil depth, the soil organic matter, total nitrogen and total phosphorus in plantation and natural forest still showed Castanopsis hystrix plantation [(24.22±7.51) g·kg~(-1),(1.23±0.32) g·kg~(-1), and(0.42±0.11) g·kg~(-1)]>Michelia plantation [(21.80±8.34) g·kg~(-1),(1.04±0.28) g·kg~(-1), and(0.29±0.11) g·kg~(-1)]>natural secondary forest [(16.15±6.42) g·kg~(-1),(0.83±0.23) g·kg~(-1), and(0.24±0.04) g·kg~(-1)]. Soil physical-chemical properties of three artificial plantations were significantly different except for the nitrate nitrogen(P<0.05).(3) Soil organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus were key factors influencing the diversity of understory vegetation. Soil organic matter content was strongly correlated with and understory species diversity(P<0.05). The herb layer had the significant correlation with nitrogen and phosphorus contents(P<0.05), and was more susceptible to changes of soil physical-chemical properties than shrub layer.
引文
AUBIN I,MESSIER C,BOUCHARD A,2008.Can plantations develop understory biological and physical attributes of naturally regenerated forests?[J].Biological Conservation,141(10):2461-2476.
    BROCKERHOFF E G,JACTEL H,PARROTTA J A,et al.,2008.Plantation forests and biodiversity:oxymoron or opportunity?[J].Biodiversity and Conservation,17(5):925-951.
    CASTELLO J D,TEALE S A,2011.Forest health:an integrated perspective[M].New York:Cambridge University Press:163-195.
    FANG Y T,ZHU W X,GUNDERSEN P,et al.,2009.Large loss of dissolved organic nitrogen from nitrogen-saturated forests in subtropical China[J].Ecosystems,12(1):33-45.
    HARTLEY M J,2002.Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests[J].For Ecological Manage,155(1):81-95.
    MORI A,TAKEDA H,2004.Effects of undisturbed canopy structure on population structure and species coexistence of an old-growth subalpine forest in central Japan[J].For Ecological Manage,200(1-3):89-100.
    MUNRO N T,FISCHER J,WOOD J,et al.,2009.Revegetation in agricultural areas:the development of structural complexity and floristic diversity[J].Ecological Application,19(5):1197-1210.
    NAGAIKE T,HAYASHI A,KUBO M,et al.,2006.Plant species diversity in a managed forest landscape composed of Larix kaempferi plantations and abandoned coppice forests in central Japan[J].Forest Science,52(3):324-332.
    ONAINDIA M,MITXELENA A,2009.Potential use of pine plantations to restore native forests in a highly fragmented river basin[J].Annals of Forest Science,66(3):305-308.
    PAQUETTE A,MESSIER C,2010.The role of plantations in managing the world's forests in the Anthropocene[J].Frontiers Ecology&the Environment,8(1):27-34.
    SIGURDSSON B D,2001.Environmental control of carbon up-take and growth in a Populus trichocarpa in Iceland[M].Uppsala:Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences:234-265.
    THOMAS S C,HALPERN C B,FALK D A,et al.,1999.Plant diversity in managed forests:understory responses to thinning and fertilization[J].Ecological applications,9(3):864-879.
    TIMOTHYM M,VERONICA A M,FRANCISCO C,et al.,2013.Soil enzyme activities,microbial communities,and carbon and nitrogen availability in organic agroecosystems across an intensively-managed agricultural landscape[J].Elsevier,68:252-262.
    WINGFIELD M J,BROCKERHOFF E G,WINGFIELD B D,et al.,2015.Plant forest health:the need for a global strategy[J].Science,349(6250):832-836.
    XU W M,LIU L,HE T H,et al.,2016.Soil properties drive a negative correlation between species diversity and genetic diversity in a tropical seasonal rainforest[J].Scientific reports,6(20652):1-8.
    鲍士旦,2000.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社:29-68.BAO S D,2000.Soil agro-chemistrical analysis[M].Beijing:China Agriculture Press:29-68.
    陈幸良,巨茜,林昆仑,2014.我国人工林发展现状、问题与对策[J].世界林业研究,27(6):54-59.CHEN X L,JU Q,LIN K L,2014.Development status,issues and countermeasures of China's plantation[J].World Forestry Research,27(6):54-59.
    程真,周光益,吴仲民,等,2015.南岭南坡中段不同群落林下幼树的生物多样性及分布[J].林业科学研究,28(4):543-550.CHENG Z,ZHOU G Y,WU Z M,et al.,2015.Biodiversities and distribution patterns of saplings in different forest communities in the Nanling Mountain,Southern China[J].Forest Research,28(4):543-550.
    崔宁洁,陈小红,刘洋,等,2014.不同林龄马尾松人工林林下灌木和草本多样性[J].生态学报,34(15):4313-4323.CUI N J,CHEN X H,LIU Y,et al.,2014.Shrub and herb diversity at different ages of Pinus massoniana plantation[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,34(15):4313-4323.
    方升佐,田野,2012.人工林生态系统生物多样性与生产力的关系[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),36(4):1-6.FANG S Z,TIAN Y,2012.The relationship between biodiversity and productivity in the artificial plantation ecosystem[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition),36(4):1-6.
    国家林业局,1999.LY/T 1210-1275-1999,森林土壤分析方法[M].北京:中国标准出版社:14-24.The State Forestry Administration of the People's Republic of China,1999.LY/T 1210-1275-1999,The analysis methods of forest soil[M].Beijing:China Standard Press:14-24.
    何毓蓉,廖超林,张保华,2015.长江上游人工林与天然林土壤结构质量及保水抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,19(5):3-6.HE Y R,LIAO C L,ZHANG B H,2005.Study on Soil Structural Quality and Water Conservation-Antierodibility under Plantation and Natural Forests in Upper Reaches of Yangtze River[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,9(5):3-6.
    贺金生,韩兴国,2010.生态化学计量学:探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论[J].植物生态学报,34(1):2-6.HE J S,HAN X G,2010.Ecological stoichiometry:Searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,34(1):2-6.
    胡喜生,洪滔,宋萍,等,2007.木荷天然林与人工林群落结构特征比较[J].福建林业科技,34(1):24-28,32.HU X S,HONG T,SONG P,et al.,2007.Comparison study on community structure features of the natural forest and the plantation of Schima superba[J].Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology,34(1):24-28,32.
    康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等,2010.南亚热带不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质[J].应用生态学报,21(10):2479-2486.KANG B,LIU S R,CAI D X,et al.,2010.Soil physical and chemical characteristics under different vegetation restoration patterns in China south subtropical area[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,21(10):2479-2486.
    李敏敏,魏天兴,李信良,等,2018.黄土区蔡家川流域刺槐人工林林下物种多样性[J].浙江农林大学学报,35(2):227-234.LI M M,WEI T X,LI X L,et al.,2018.Species diversity in the understory of a Robinia pseudoacacia plantation in the Caijiachuan Watershed of the Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Zhejiang A&FUniversity,35(2):227-234.
    刘世荣,杨予静,王晖,2017.中国人工林经营发展战略与对策:从追求木材产量的单一目标经营转向提升生态系统服务质量和效益的多目标经营[J].生态学报,38(1):1-10.LIU S R,YANG Y J,WANG H,et al.,2018.Development strategy and management countermeasures of planted foreste in China:transforming form timber-centered single objective management towards multipurpose management for enhancing quality and benefits of ecosystem services[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,38(1):1-10.
    刘兴诏,周国逸,张德强,等,2010.南亚热带森林不同演替阶段植物与土壤中N、P的化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,34(1):64-71.LIU X Z,ZHOU G Y,ZHANG D Q,et al.,2010.N and Pstoichiometry of plant and soil in lower subtropical forest successional series in southern China[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,34(1):64-71.
    刘旭平,梁平,2018.乐昌市野生观赏植物资源及其利用[J].现代农业科技(5):147-149.LIU X P,LIANG P,2018.Wild ornamental plant resources and application in Lechang city[J].Modern Agricultural Science and Technology(5):147-149.
    卢志军,鲍大川,郭屹立,等,2013.八大公山中亚热带山地常绿落叶阔叶混交林物种组成与结构[J].植物科学学报,31(4):336-344.LU Z J,BAO D C,GUO Y L,et al.,2013.Community composition and structure of Badagongshan(BDGS)forest dynamic plot in a mid subtropical mountain evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest,central China[J].Plant Science Journal,31(4):336-344.
    马克平,刘玉明,1994.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰ:α多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性,2(4):231-234.MA K P,LIU Y M,1994.Measuring method for the diversity of biological communitiesⅠ:Measuring method for theαdiversity(2)[J].Chinese Biodiversity,2(4):231-234.
    马淑琴,薛正伟,杨丽丽,等,2017.塔里木荒漠河岸林异质生境物种多样性比较与其测度指标筛选及评价[J].植物研究,37(6):62-69.MA S Q,XUE Z W,YANG L L,et al.,2017.Comparison of species diversity under heterogeneous habitats,determination and evaluation of diversity indices of desert riparian forest community in Tarim basin[J].Bulletin of Botanical Research,37(6):62-69.
    马志波,肖文发,黄清麟,等,2016.森林群落多样性与空间格局研究综述[J].世界林业研究,29(3):35-39.MA Z B,XIAO W F,HUANG Q L,et al.,2016.A review of diversity and spatial pattern of forest community[J].World Forestry Research,29(3):35-39.
    苗娟,周传艳,李世杰,等,2014.不同林龄云南松林土壤有机碳和全氮积累特征[J].应用生态学报,25(3):625-631.MIAO J,ZHOU C Y,LI S J,et al.,2014.Accumulation of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in Pinus yunnanensis forests at different age stages[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,25(3):625-631.
    王丽娟,王孝安,原志坚,等,2017.抚育对黄土高原人工油松林林下植被的影响[J].生态环境学报,26(8):1301-1309.WANG L J,WANG X A,YUAN Z J,et al.,2017.Effects of tending on undergrowth vegetation of artificial Pinus tabuliformis forests on the Loess Plateau[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,26(8):1301-1309.
    王新宇,王庆成,2008.水曲柳落叶松人工林近自然化培育对林地土壤理化性质的影响[J].林业科学,44(12):21-27.WANG X Y,WANG Q C,2008.Effects of the close-to-nature cultivation of Larix olgensis and Fraxinus mandshurica on the Soil Physiochemical Properties[J].Scientia Silvea Sinicae,44(12):21-27.
    魏晨辉,王文杰,沈光,等,2015.不同植物种植对松嫩平原盐碱地土壤理化性质与细根生长的影响[J].植物研究,35(5):759-764.WEI C H,WANG W J,SHEN G,et al.,2015.Effect of different plants cultivation on soil physical properties and fine root growth in saline-alkaline soil in Songnen plain,Northeastern China[J].Bulletin of Boyanical Research,35(5):759-764.
    魏彦昌,欧阳志云,苗鸿,等,2007.尖峰岭自然保护区土壤性质空间异质性[J].生态学杂志,26(2):197-203.WEI Y C,OUYANG Z Y,MIAO H,et al.,2007.Spatial heterogeneity of soil properties in Jianfengling Nature Reserve[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,26(2):197-203.
    夏艳菊,张静,邹顺,等,2018.南亚热带森林群落演替过程中结构多样性与碳储量的变化[J].生态环境学报,27(3):424-431.XIA Y J,ZHANG J,ZOU S,et al.,2018.Dynamics of structural diversity and carbon storage along a successional gradient in south subtropical forest[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,27(3):424-431.
    许涵,李意德,骆土寿,等,2009.尖峰岭热带山地雨林不同更新林的群落特征[J].林业科学,45(1):14-20.XU H,LI Y D,LUO T S,et al.,2009.Community structure characteristics of tropical montane rain forests with different regeneration types in Jianfengling[J].Scientia Silvea Sinicae,45(1):14-20.
    姚俊宇,齐锦秋,张柳桦,等,2018.人为干扰对碧峰峡山矾次生林群落物种多样性和土壤理化性质的影响[J].生态学杂志,37(10):2942-2950.YAO J Y,QI J Q,ZHANG L H,et al.,2018.Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on species diversity and soil physicochemical properties of Symplocos sumuntia secondary forest in Bifengxia[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,37(10):2942-2950.
    叶万辉,2000.物种多样性与植物群落的维持机制[J].生物多样性,8(1):17-24.YE W H,2000.The maintenance mechanism of plant community and its species diversity[J].Chinses Biodiversity,8(1):17-24.
    叶万辉,曹洪麟,黄忠良,等,2008.鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林20公顷样地群落特征研究[J].植物生态学报,32(2):274-286.YE W H,CAO H L,HUANG Z L,et al.,2008.Community structure of a 20 hm2 lower subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest ploy in DingHushan,China[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,32(2):274-286.
    张贾宇,徐叶宁,陶慧颖,等,2018.杨-桤短期混交的林地土壤养分异质性[J].生态环境学报,27(2):216-223.ZHANG J Y,XU Y N,TAO H Y,et al.,2018.Short-term effects on the heterogeneity of soil nutrients in mixed poplar-alder plantation[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,27(2):216-223.
    张珂,2017.岭南槭群落特征?色彩呈现及美景度研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院:14-20.ZHANG K,2017.Study on community characteristics,color expression and landscape beauty of Acer tutcheri Duthie[D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry:14-20.
    张晓君,管伟,廖宝文,等,2014.珠海人工红树林与天然红树林群落特征比较研究[J].生态科学,33(2):321-326.ZHANG X J,GUAN W,LIAO B W,et al.,2014.Comparison on the community characteristics between artificial and natural mangroves in Zhuhai City[J].Ecological Science,33(2):321-326.
    朱锦懋,江训强,黄儒珠,等,1996.毛竹林物种多样性的初步分析[J].福建林学院学报,16(1):5-8.ZHU J M,JIANG X Q,HUANG R Z,et al.,1996.A preliminary analysis on species diversity of Phyllostachys pubescens[J].Journal of Fujian College Forestry,16(1):5-8.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700