用户名: 密码: 验证码:
草甘膦对入侵植物加拿大一枝黄花和伴生植物白茅光合特性的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of glyphosate on photosynthetic characteristics of an invasive plant Solidago canadensis and an indigenous plant Imperata cylindrica
  • 作者:古春凤 ; 叶小齐 ; 吴明 ; 邵学新 ; 焦盛武
  • 英文作者:GU Chunfeng;YE Xiaoqi;WU Ming;SHAO Xuexin;JIAO Shengwu;Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,National Research Station of Hangzhou bay Wetlands Ecosystem;College of Life and Environment Sciences,Hangzhou Normal University;
  • 关键词:除草剂 ; 加拿大一枝黄花 ; 白茅 ; 生长 ; 光合作用
  • 英文关键词:herbicide;;Solidago canadensis;;Imperata cylindrica;;growth;;photosynthesis
  • 中文刊名:STXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Ecologica Sinica
  • 机构:中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所杭州湾湿地生态系统国家定位观测研究站;杭州师范大学生命与环境科学学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-01-08 09:11
  • 出版单位:生态学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.38
  • 基金:中国林业科学研究院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(CAFYBB2016SY010);; 浙江省公益技术研究农业项目(2015C32011);; 浙江省自然科学基金(LY17C030002)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STXB201808013
  • 页数:11
  • CN:08
  • ISSN:11-2031/Q
  • 分类号:142-152
摘要
入侵植物加拿大一枝黄花(Solidago canadensis)给许多地区带来了较大危害,目前常采用化学防除法进行防除,但除草剂防治入侵植物的同时难免会影响土著植物的生长。为探讨草甘膦对入侵植物与本地植物光合特性的影响,以加拿大一枝黄花及其伴生种白茅(Imperata cylindrica)为研究对象,采用盆栽控制试验方法,研究不同浓度草甘膦处理21后单种、混种加拿大一枝黄花和白茅的生长特征及光响应过程。结果表明:1)草甘膦显著抑制两种植物的生长。随处理浓度升高,加拿大一枝黄花的株高增长量不断减小、叶片枯萎率不断增加;白茅的分蘖死亡率、叶片枯萎率不断升高。白茅对草甘膦较敏感,0.6mL/L浓度下白茅先失绿,1.2mL/L下其分蘖死亡率、叶片枯萎率均超50%;1.8mL/L下加拿大一枝黄花叶片枯萎率超50%。施药后与单种相比,混种加拿大一枝黄花株高增长略快、叶片枯萎率略低,混种白茅分蘖死亡率及叶片枯萎率均较低,但单、混种之间差异不显著。种间关系显著影响白茅的分蘖数。2)随处理浓度递增,加拿大一枝黄花和白茅叶片净光合速率(P_n)、气孔导度(G_s)、蒸腾速率(T_r)均不断降低,白茅下降更快。两个物种胞间CO_2浓度(C_i)的变化不同,随着浓度升高,单种加拿大一枝黄花C_i先下降而后上升,而混种时的C_i则不断下降;单、混种白茅C_i均上升。3)草甘膦显著影响加拿大一枝黄花和白茅最大净光合速率(P_(nmax))、光饱和点(LSP)和光补偿点(LCP);对两个物种暗呼吸速率(R_d)的影响不显著,对加拿大一枝黄花表观量子效率(AQY)的影响同样不显著,但显著影响白茅AQY。种植方式显著影响两个物种P_(nmax)、LSP以及白茅R_d和AQY。0.6mL/L草甘膦对混种加拿大一枝黄花和白茅P_(nmax)的影响要大于对单种植株的影响,随处理浓度上升,对不同种植方式下两种植物P_(nmax)的影响趋近。与本地种白茅相比,入侵植物加拿大一枝黄花具有更高的光合速率和生长速率;草甘膦显著降低两个物种的生长和光合作用,白茅对草甘膦处理更敏感。
        Solidago canadensis,which poses a serious threat to the regions it has invaded,causes considerable economic loss every year throughout the world. Different methods are used to control invasive species,among which chemical control is widely used. However,herbicide application may have a negative effect on the growth of neighboring native species.Recently,glyphosate,which has high efficiency and low toxicity,has become widely used both in China and abroad. In the present study,distinctive photosynthetic responses to glyphosate treatment in the invasive( S. canadensis) and native(Imperata cylindrica) plants were compared to investigate the impact of herbicide application on alien and indigenous plants. Plants were grown in monoculture and mixed culture for a 21-day period, and growth and photosynthetic characteristics were determined under four different concentrations of glyphosate( 0,0.6,1.2,1.8 mL/L). The results were as follows:( 1) Glyphosate significantly inhibited the growth of S. canadensis and I. cylindrica( P < 0. 05). Cumulative growth in height and the number of green leaves of S. canadensis were apparently reduced with increasing concentration of glyphosate,while withering rate of tillers and leaves of I. cylindrica were obviously increased. Imperata cylindrica showed more sensitivity to glyphosate treatment than S. canadensis; it turned yellow from 0. 6 mL/L glyphosate concentration,and the withering rate exceeded 50% with 1. 2 mL/L glyphosate concentration,while the withering rate of the leaves of S.canadensis surpassed 50% level with 1.8 mL/L glyphosate concentration. Compared with the plants grown in monoculture,S.canadensis grown in mixture tended to have higher cumulative height and fewer withered leaves,while I. cylindrica grown in mixed culture grew better after herbicide treatments. There were no significant differences between different planting systems during the experimental period. Planting pattern had obvious impact on the tiller number of I. cylindrica( P < 0.05).( 2)Glyphosate significantly weakened the net photosynthetic rate( P_n),stomatal conductance( G_s),and transpiration rate(T_r) of S. canadensis and I. cylindrica(P<0.05); the latter declined at a higher rate. The responses of intercellular CO_2 concentration( C_i) to glyphosate treatment differed between these two species. C_i of S. canadensis grown in monoculture first reduced and then increased,while C_i of S. canadensis grown in mixture decreased unceasingly; C_i of I. cylindrica grown both in monoculture and mixture increased with increasing glyphosate concentration.( 3) Specifically,the maximum net photosynthetic rate( P_(nmax)) and light saturation point(LSP) of S. canadensis and I. cylindrica declined,while their light compensation point( LCP) increased with increasing glyphosate concentration; glyphosate had no obvious effect on dark respiration rate( R_d) of these two species and the apparent quantum yield(AQY) of S. canadensis,but showed obvious influence on AQY of I. cylindrica( P<0.05). Planting system had significant effects on the P_(nmax) and LSP of S. canadensis and I. cylindrica,as well as on the R_d and AQY of I. cylindrica. Glyphosate concentration of 0.6 mL/L had less effect on the P_(nmax) of plants grown in monoculture than those grown in mixed culture,while the effect of glyphosate on the Pnmaxof both species grown in different planting systems became similar with increasing treatment concentration. Compared with the native plant I. cylindrica, the alien species S. canadensis had stronger photosynthesis and higher growth rate; glyphosate significantly weakened the photosynthesis of these two species,with I. cylindrica showing greater sensitivity to glyphosate treatment.
引文
[1]Westphal M I,Browne M,Mac Kinnon K,Noble I.The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species.Biological Invasions,2008,10(4):391-398.
    [2]鞠瑞亭,李慧,石正人,李博.近十年中国生物入侵研究进展.生物多样性,2012,20(5):581-611.
    [3]闫小玲,寿海洋,马金双.中国外来入侵植物研究现状及存在的问题.植物分类与资源学报,2012,34(3):287-313.
    [4]强胜,陈国奇,李保平,孟玲.中国农业生态系统外来种入侵及其管理现状.生物多样性,2010,18(6):647-659.
    [5]Duke S O,Powles S B.Glyphosate:a once-in-a-century herbicide.Pest Management Science,2008,64(4):319-325.
    [6]周垂帆,李莹,张晓勇,俞元春.草甘膦毒性研究进展.生态环境学报,2013,22(10):1737-1743.
    [7]戴雅娟.加拿大一枝黄花(Solidago canadensis L.)组织培养途径及草甘膦处理后生理生化指标变化的研究[D].金华:浙江师范大学,2009.
    [8]Huang J L,Silva E N,Shen Z G,Jiang B,Lu H F.Effects of glyphosate on photosynthesis,chlorophyll fluorescence and physicochemical properties of cogongrass(Imperata cylindrical L.).Plant Omics Journal,2012,5(2):177-183.
    [9]刘文娟,刘勇,黄小琴,周西全,宋君,尹全,王东,陶李,张富丽,常丽娟,张蕾,雷绍荣.不同时期喷施草甘膦对抗草甘膦转基因大豆生长和产量构成的影响.中国农业科学,2012,45(4):675-684.
    [10]谭效松,贺红武.除草剂的作用靶标与作用模式.农药,2005,44(12):533-537,557-577.
    [11]Teixeira M C,Duque P,Sá-Correia I.Environmental genomics:mechanistic insights into toxicity of and resistance to the herbicide 2,4-D.Trends in Biotechnology,2007,25(8):363-370.
    [12]Yemets A,Stelmakh O,Blume Y B.Effects of the herbicide isopropyl-N-phenyl carbamate on microtubules and MTOCs in lines of Nicotiana sylvestris resistant and sensitive to its action.Cell Biology International,2008,32(6):623-629.
    [13]宋宏峰,郭磊,张斌斌,汪晨雨.除草剂对毛桃幼苗生长与光合的影响.园艺学报,2014,41(11):2208-2214.
    [14]Williams D G,Mack R N,Black R A.Ecophysiology of introduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii:the role of phenotypic plasticity.Ecology,1995,76(5):1569-1580.
    [15]Williamson M,Fitter A.The varying success of invaders.Ecology,1996,77(6):1661-1666.
    [16]Funk J L,Vitousek P M.Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems.Nature,2007,446(7139):1079-1081.
    [17]Wang N,Yu F H,Li P X,He W M,Liu F H,Liu J M,Dong M.Clonal integration affects growth,photosynthetic efficiency and biomass allocation,but not the competitive ability,of the alien invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides under severe stress.Annals of Botany,2008,101(5):671-678.
    [18]You W H,Fan S F,Yu D,Xie D,Liu C H.An invasive clonal plant benefits from clonal integration more than a co-Occurring native plant in nutrient-patchy and competitive environments.PLo S One,2014,9(5):e97246.
    [19]Scherner A,Avila L.Schreiber F,Kruse N D,Fernando J A,Garcia E N.Susceptibility of peruvian watergrass and rice cutgrass to glyphosate under soil moisture variations.Crop Protection,2017,98:1-7.
    [20]Alcantara R,Fernandez P,Smeda R J,Alves P L,Prado R D.Response of Eleusine indica and Paspalum distichum to glyphosate following repeated use in citrus groves.Crop Protection,2016,79:1-7.
    [21]Song N H,Yin X L,Chen G F,Yang H.Biological responses of wheat(Triticum aestivum)plants to the herbicide chlorotoluron in soils.Chemosphere,2007,68(9):1779-1787.
    [22]Mateos-Naranjo E,Perez-Martin A.Effects of sub-lethal glyphosate concentrations on growth and photosynthetic performance of non-target species Bolboschoenus maritimus.Chemosphere,2013,93(10):2631-2638.
    [23]谭伟,王慧,翟衡.除草剂对葡萄叶片光合作用及贮藏营养的影响.应用生态学报,2011,22(9):2355-2362.
    [24]郭磊,张斌斌,周懋,宋宏峰.除草剂对桃树生理特性和流胶的影响.西北植物学报,2017,37(1):81-87.
    [25]Pal R W,Chen S Y,Nagy D U,Callaway R M.Impacts of Solidago gigantea on other species at home and away.Biological Invasions,2015,17(11):3317-3325.
    [26]雷军成,徐海根.基于Max Ent的加拿大一枝黄花在中国的潜在分布区预测.生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(2):137-141.
    [27]杨如意,昝树婷,唐建军,陈欣.加拿大一枝黄花的入侵机理研究进展.生态学报,2011,31(4):1185-1194.
    [28]Gusev A P.The impact of invasive Canadian goldenrod(Solidago Canadensis L.)on regenerative succession in old fields(the southeast of Belarus).Russian Journal of Biological Invasions,2015,6(2):74-77.
    [29]李长明,叶小齐,吴明,邵学新.水深及共存对芦苇和香蒲生长特征的影响.湿地科学,2015,13(5):609-615.
    [30]叶小齐,吴明,邵学新,蒋跃平,王蒙.不同土著草本群落对加拿大一枝黄花早期阶段入侵的抑制能力研究.生态与农村环境学报,2014,30(5):608-613.
    [31]De Wit C T.On competition.Verslagen Landbouwkundig Onderzoek,1960,66:1-82.
    [32]宁金花,陆魁东,霍治国,解娜,黄晚华.拔节期淹涝胁迫对水稻形态和产量构成因素的影响.生态学杂志,2014,33(7):1818-1825.
    [33]叶子飘.光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展.植物生态学报,2010,34(6):727-740.
    [34]黄建丽.草甘膦对紫茎泽兰和白茅生理指标的影响及草甘膦在植物体内生物传导途径的研究[D].金华:浙江师范大学,2012.
    [35]Yanniccari M,Tambussi E,Istilart C,Castro A M.Glyphosate effects on gas Exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of two Lolium perenne L.biotypes with differential herbicide sensitivity.Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2012,57:210-217.
    [36]Londo J P,Mc Kinney J,Schwartz M,Bollman M,Sagers C,Watrud L.Sub-lethal glyphosate exposure alters flowering phenology and causes transient male-sterility in Brassica spp.BMC Plant Biology,2014,14:70-70.
    [37]古春凤,叶小齐,吴明,邵学新,焦盛武.草甘膦对加拿大一枝黄花和伴生植物白茅种间竞争关系的影响.植物生态学报,2017,41(4):439-449.
    [38]沈荔花,李国庆,戎红,于翠平,林文雄.入侵植物加拿大一枝黄花对小麦光合生理的影响.中国农学通报,2009,25(14):252-255.
    [39]Weidenhamer J R,Callaway R M.Direct and indirect effects of invasive plants on soil chemistry and ecosystem function.Journal of Chemical Ecology,2010,36(1):59-69.
    [40]李光义,侯宪文,邓晓,王中,张桂花,李勤奋.除草剂对蟛蜞菊化感作用的影响研究.中国农学通报,2010,26(1):173-181.
    [41]Zou J,Rogers W E,Siemann E.Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum.Functional Ecology,2007,21(4):721-730.
    [42]刘全吉,孙学成,胡承孝,谭启玲.砷对小麦生长和光合作用特性的影响.生态学报,2009,29(2):854-859.
    [43]Chown S L,Slabber S,Mc Geoch M A,Janion C,Leinaas H P.Phenotypic plasticity mediates climate change responses among invasive and indigenous arthropods.Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2007,274(1625):2531-2537.
    [44]魏子上,陈新微,杨殿林,皇甫超河.辽宁地区两种菊科入侵植物与本地植物光合特性比较.中国生态农业学报,2017,25(7):975-982.
    [45]胡天印,方芳,郭水良,蒋华伟.外来入侵种加拿大一枝黄花及其伴生植物光合特性研究.浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2007,33(4):379-386.
    [46]梅玲笑,陈欣,唐建军.外来杂草加拿大一枝黄花对入侵地植物的化感效应.应用生态学报,2005,16(12):2379-2382.
    [47]Abhilasha D,Quintana N,Vivanco J,Joshi J.Do allelopathic compounds in invasive Solidago canadensis s.l.restrain the native European flora?Journal of Ecology,2008,96(5):993-1001.
    [48]Reddy K N,Hoagland R E,Zablotowicz R M.Effect of glyphosate on growth,chlorophyll,and nodulation in glyphosate-resistant and susceptible soybean(Glycine max)varieties.Journal of New Seeds,2000,2(3):37-52.
    [49]Muller R,Schreiber U,Escher B I,Quayle P,Nash S M B,Mueller J F.Rapid exposure assessment of PSII herbicides in surface water using a novel chlorophyll a fluorescence imaging assay.Science of the Total Environment,2008,401(1/3):51-59.
    [50]惠红霞,许兴,李前荣.外源甜菜碱对盐胁迫下枸杞光合功能的改善.西北植物学报,2003,23(12):2137-2142.
    [51]许大全.光合作用气孔限制分析中的一些问题.植物生理学通讯,1997,33(4):241-244.
    [52]Farquhar C D,Sharkey T D.Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis.Annual Review of Plant Physiology,1982,33:317-345.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700