用户名: 密码: 验证码:
野生大熊猫与放牧家畜的活动格局比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative activity patterns of wild giant pandas and livestock
  • 作者:周世强 ; 张晋东 ; Vanessa ; HULL ; 黄金燕 ; 刘巅 ; 周季秋 ; 孙萌萌 ; 张和民
  • 英文作者:ZHOU Shiqiang;ZHANG Jindong;Vanessa HULL;HUANG Jinyan;LIU Dian;ZHOU Jiqiu;SUN Mengmeng;ZHANG Hemin;Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in The Giant Pandas National Park,China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda;Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation,China West Normal University,Ministry of Education;Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation,University of Florida;
  • 关键词:大熊猫 ; 放牧家畜 ; 活动格局 ; GPS颈圈 ; 卧龙国家级自然保护区
  • 英文关键词:Giant pandas(Ailuropoda melanoleuca);;livestock;;GPS collar;;activity pattern;;Wolong National Nature Reserve
  • 中文刊名:STXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Ecologica Sinica
  • 机构:中国大熊猫保护研究中心大熊猫国家公园珍稀动物保护生物学国家林业和草原局重点实验室;西华师范大学西南野生动植物资源保护教育部重点实验室;Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation,University of Florida;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-05 09:04
  • 出版单位:生态学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:国家林业局大熊猫国际合作基金项目(SD0631,SD1113,WL01)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STXB201903031
  • 页数:11
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:11-2031/Q
  • 分类号:318-328
摘要
活动格局是动物内在机制和环境作用所表现出来的昼夜活动节律及其活动水平的行为生态特征,影响着动物的能量代谢能力、觅食行为策略和进化适应。通过内置活动传感器的GPS颈圈,于2010—2012年在四川卧龙国家级自然保护区的"核桃坪"及其毗邻区域,采集了野生大熊猫和放牧家畜的大量活动数据。分别选择3只成年大熊猫和3个马群的代表性个体作为样本,引入活动强度、活动时间百分率、活动时间片段率和活动片段时长等指标进行了两者之间的比较,以揭示大熊猫和放牧家畜在时间利用方面的内在特征。结果表明:野生大熊猫和放牧家畜在活动强度、活动时间百分率和活动时间片段率等方面都具有极显著性差异(P<0.0001),仅两者之间的活动片段时长无明显的统计学意义(P=0.4107)。野生大熊猫表现为活动水平低、活动时间少、活动片段率高和活动片段时长短等特征的活动格局,且不同月份(季度)之间变化较大(P<0.0001);放牧家畜则呈现出相异的时间利用规律,即活动水平高、活动时间多、活动时间片段率稍低和活动片段时长略长等特性。不同的时间利用规律和不同的空间利用模式,造成动物之间对栖息地、食物资源和伴生动物的利用方式、影响强度和空间分布的截然不同。因而,合理规划和管控放牧家畜的散养区域与数量,是自然保护管理与社区经济发展相协调的有效途径之一。
        Aspects of an animal' s activity patterns such as circadian rhythm and activity level are caused by intrinsic mechanisms and environmental effects,and in turn affect an animal' s energy metabolism abilities,foraging behavior strategies,and evolutionary adaptation. Using GPS collars with dual-axis accelerometers fitted on wild giant pandas and livestock( horses),we collected activity data from 2010 to 2012 in the Hetaoping Research and Conservation Center for the Giant Panda and the adjacent area of the Wolong National Nature Reserve. Representative individuals,namely three adult giant pandas and three horses,were selected as samples. Indices of activity levels,active time percentage,activity fragmentation rate,and active segment duration were compared between the groups in order to reveal intrinsic features of the giant pandas and livestock in terms of time utilization. The results showed that the wild pandas and livestock had differences in activity intensity,percentage of active time,and activity fragmentation rate( all P < 0.0001). There was no significant statistical difference between them in the duration of activity segments( P = 0.4107). Wild pandas showed activity patterns with a low activity level,less active time,high activity fragmentation rate,and low duration of activity segments,which varied greatly between different months( seasons)( P < 0. 0001). Livestock exhibited distinctive time-use patterns,i. e.elevated activity levels,multiple active times,slightly lower activity segment ratios,and somewhat longer duration of action segments. The discrete time-use patterns and spatial utilization models stemmed from the differences in utilization patterns,impact strength,and specific distribution in habitats and food resources of the animals. Therefore,rational planning and control of the extent of free-range areas for livestock is an effective way to harmonize nature conservation management with community economic development.
引文
[1]国家林业局.全国第三次大熊猫调查报告.北京:科学出版社,2006:1-355.
    [2]中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.国家林业局举行全国第四次大熊猫调查结果新闻发布会.(2015-03-01)[2018-03-20]http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-03/01/content_2823605.htm
    [3]唐小平,贾建生,王志臣,张德辉,遇宝成,岳建兵,龚明昊,刘洋.全国第四次大熊猫调查方案设计及主要结果分析.林业资源管理,2015,(1):11-16.
    [4]Kang D W,Li J Q.Premature downgrade of panda's status.Science,2016,354(6310):295.
    [5]周世强,屈元元,黄金燕,黄炎,李德生,张和民.野生大熊猫种群动态的研究综述.四川林业科技,2017,38(2):17-30.
    [6]冉江洪,刘少英,王鸿加,孙治宇,曾宗永,刘世昌.小相岭大熊猫与放牧家畜的生境选择.生态学报,2003,23(11):2253-2259.
    [7]冉江洪,刘少英,王鸿加,孙治宇,曾宗永,刘世昌.放牧对冶勒自然保护区大熊猫生境的影响.兽类学报,2003,23(4):288-294.
    [8]冉江洪,刘少英,王鸿加,曾宗永,孙治宇,刘世昌.小相岭大熊猫栖息地干扰调查.兽类学报,2004,24(4):277-281.
    [9]王学志.岷山地区人类活动干扰对大熊猫生境利用的影响研究[D].北京:中国科学院生态环境研究中心,2008.
    [10]康东伟,赵联军,宋国华.四川王朗国家级自然保护区大熊猫与家畜竞争关系.东北林业大学学报,2011,39(7):74-76.
    [11]Hull V,Zhang J D,Zhou S Q,Huang J Y,Viňa A,Liu W,Tuanmu M N,Li R G,Liu D,Xu W H,Huang Y,Ouyang Z Y,Zhang H M,Liu J G.Impact of livestock on giant pandas and their habitat.Journal for Nature Conservation,2014,22(3):256-264.
    [12]四川省林业厅.四川的大熊猫:四川省第四次大熊猫调查报告.成都:四川科学技术出版社,2015:129-159.
    [13]Steinfeld H,Gerber P,Wassenaar T,Castel V,Rosales M,de Haan C.Livestock's long shadow:environmental issues and options.Rome:Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations,2006.[2018-03-20].http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e.pdf
    [14]Adler P,Raff D,Lauenroth W.The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation.Oecologia,2001,128(4):465-479.
    [15]Madhusudan M D.Recovery of wild large herbivores following livestock decline in a tropical Indian wildlife reserve.Journal of Applied Ecology,2004,41(5):858-869.
    [16]van Uytvanck J,Hoffmann M.Impact of grazing management with large herbivores on forest ground flora and bramble understorey.Acta Oecologica,2009,35(4):523-532.
    [17]Bai Y F,Wu J G,Clark C M,Pan Q M,Zhang L X,Chen S P,Wang Q B,Han X G.Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C:N:Pstoichiometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient.Journal of Applied Ecology,2012,49(6):1204-1215.
    [18]Evans D M,Villar N,Littlewood N A,Pakeman R J,Evans S A,Dennis P,Skartveit J,Redpath S M.The cascading impacts of livestock grazing in upland ecosystems:a 10-year experiment.Ecosphere,2015,6(3):1-15.
    [19]Li W H,Zhan S X,Lan Z C,Wu X B,Bai Y F.Scale-dependent patterns and mechanisms of grazing-induced biodiversity loss:evidence from a field manipulation experiment in semiarid steppe.Landscape Ecology,2015,30(9):1751-1765.
    [20]Ren H Y,Taube F,Stein C,Zhang Y J,Bai Y F,Hu S J.Grazing weakens temporal stabilizing effects of diversity in the Eurasian steppe.Ecology and Evolution,2018,8(1):231-241.
    [21]Erb K H,Kastner T,Plutzar C,Bais A L S,Carvalhais N,Fetzel T,Gingrich S,Haberl H,Lauk C,Niedertscheider M,Pongratz J,Thurner M,Luyssaert S.Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass.Nature,2018,553(7686):73-76.
    [22]黄金燕,刘巅,张明春,谢浩,周世强,李仁贵,张晋东,周小平,黄炎,李德生,张和民.放牧对卧龙大熊猫栖息地草本植物物种多样性与竹子生长影响.竹子学报,2017,36(2):57-64.
    [23]周世强,Hull V,张晋东,黄金燕,刘巅,黄炎,李德生,张和民.野生大熊猫与放牧家畜的空间利用格局比较.兽类学报,2016,36(2):138-151.
    [24]Li B V,Pimm S L,Li S,Zhao L J,Luo C P.Free-ranging livestock threaten the long-term survival of giant pandas.Biological Conservation,2017,216:18-25.
    [25]Zhang J D,Hull V,Ouyang Z Y,Li R G,Connor T,Yang H B,Zhang Z J,Silet B,Zhang H M,Liu J G.Divergent responses of sympatric species to livestock encroachment at fine spatiotemporal scales.Biological Conservation,2017,209:119-129.
    [26]Allada R,White N E,So W V,Hall J C,Rosbash M.A mutant Drosophila homolog of Mammalian clock disrupts circadian rhythms and transcription of Period and Timeless.Cell,1998,93(5):791-804.
    [27]Dunlap J C.Molecular bases for circadian clocks.Cell,1999,96(2):271-290.
    [28]韦芳,王正荣.哺乳动物的生物钟分子机制研究进展.四川生理科学杂志,2002,24(1):1-4.
    [29]孙儒泳.动物生态学原理(第三版).北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001:91-98.
    [30]Mc NAB B K.Ecological factors influence energetics in the order Carnivora.Acta Zoologica Sinica,2005,51(4):535-545.
    [31]Nie Y G,Speakman J R,Wu Q,Zhang C L,Hu Y B,Xia M H,Yan L,Hambly C,Wang L,Wei W,Zhang J G,Wei F W.Exceptionally low daily energy expenditure in the bamboo-eating giant panda.Science,2015,349(6244):171-174.
    [32]Beier P,Mc Cullough D R.Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use.Wildlife Monographs,1990,109:3-51.
    [33]Beltrán J F,Delibes M.Environmental determinants of circadian activity of free-ranging Iberian lynxes.Journal of Mammalogy,1994,75(2):382-393.
    [34]Schmidt K.Variation in daily activity of the free-living Eurasian lynx(Lynx lynx)in Bialowieza Primeval Forest,Poland.Journal of Zoology,1999,249(4):417-425.
    [35]Kolbe J A,Squires J R.Circadian activity patterns of Canada lynx in western Montana.Journal of Wildlife Management,2007,71(5):1607-1611.
    [36]Garshelis D L,Pelton M R.Activity of black bears in the Great Smoky Mountains national park.Journal of Mammalogy,1980,61(1):8-19.
    [37]胡锦矗,乔治·夏勒,潘文石,朱靖.卧龙的大熊猫.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1985:33-116.
    [38]Schaller G B,Hu J C,Pan W S,Zhu J.The Giant Pandas of Wolong.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1985:47-107.
    [39]雍严格,王宽武,汪铁军.佛坪大熊猫的移动习性.兽类学报,1994,14(1):9-14.
    [40]潘文石,吕植,朱小健,王大军,王昊,龙玉,付达莉,周欣.继续生存的机会.北京:北京大学出版社,2001:1-522.
    [41]Liu X H,Skidmore A K,Wang T J,Yong Y G,Prins H H T.Giant panda movements in Foping Nature Reserve,China.The Journal of Wildlife Management,2002,66(4):1179-1188.
    [42]张晋东,Hull V,黄金燕,周世强,李仁贵,刘巅,黄炎,李德生,徐卫华,张和民,刘建国,欧阳志云.大熊猫取食竹笋期间的昼夜活动节律和强度.生态学报,2011,31(10):2655-2661.
    [43]Zhang J D,Hull V,Huang J Y,Zhou S Q,Xu W H,Yang H B,Mc Connell W J,Li R G,Liu D,Huang Y,Ouyang Z Y,Zhang H M,Liu J G.Activity patterns of the giant panda(Ailuropoda melanoleuca).Journal of Mammalogy,2015,96(6):1116-1127.
    [44]Zhang Z J,Sheppard J K,Swaisgood R R,Wang G,Nie Y G,Wei W,Zhao N X,Wei F W.Ecological scale and seasonal heterogeneity in the spatial behaviors of giant pandas.Integrative Zoology,2014,9(1):46-60.
    [45]Hull V,Zhang J D,Zhou S Q,Huang J Y,Li R G,Liu D,Xu W H,Huang Y,Ouyang Z Y,Zhang H M,Liu J G.Space use by endangered giant pandas.Journal of Mammalogy,2015,96(1):230-236.
    [46]卧龙自然保护区管理局,南充师范学院生物系,四川省林业厅保护处.卧龙植被及资源植物.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1987:11-194.
    [47]周世强,黄金燕,张亚辉,李德生,黄炎,周小平,王鹏彦,张和民.卧龙自然保护区大熊猫栖息地植物群落多样性Ⅴ:不同竹林的物种多样性.应用与环境生物学报,2009,15(2):180-187.
    [48]Huang J,Li Y Z,Du L M,Yang B,Shen F J,Zhang H M,Zhang Z H,Zhang X Y,Yue B S.Genome-wide survey and analysis of microsatellites in giant panda(Ailuropoda melanoleuca),with a focus on the applications of a novel microsatellite marker system.BMC Genomics,2015,16(1):61.
    [49]Hull V,Zhang J D,Huang J Y,Zhou S Q,Vi1a A,Shortridge A,Li R G,Liu D,Xu W H,Ouyang Z Y,Zhang H M,Liu J G.Habitat Use and Selection by Giant Pandas.PLoS One,2016,11(9):e0162266.
    [50]Coulombe M L,MasséA,C8téS D.Quantification and accuracy of activity data measured with VHF and GPS telemetry.Wildlife Society Bulletin,2006,34(1):81-92.
    [51]张红兵,贾来喜,李潞.SPSS宝典.北京:电子工业出版社,2007:25-116.
    [52]叶卫平.Origin 9.1科技绘图及数据分析.北京:机械工业出版社,2015:1-462.
    [53]周小平,王鹏彦,张和民,魏荣平,张贵权,李德生,黄炎,Ronald Swaisgood.圈养大熊猫行为研究及其方法.成都:四川科学技术出版社,2005:1-23.
    [54]黄金燕,周世强,谭迎春,周小平,王鹏彦,张和民.卧龙自然保护区大熊猫栖息地植物群落多样性研究:丰富度、物种多样性指数和均匀度.林业科学,2007,43(3):73-78.
    [55]周世强,张和民,李德生.大熊猫觅食行为的栖息地管理策略.四川动物,2010,29(3):340-345.
    [56]Li Y X,Swaisgood R R,Wei W,Nie Y G,Hu Y B,Yang X Y,Gu X D,Zhang Z J.Withered on the stem:is bamboo a seasonally limiting resource for giant pandas?Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2017,24(11):10537-10546.
    [57]Zhang Z J,Zhan X J,Yan L,Li M,Hu J C,Wei F W.What determines selection and abandonment of a foraging patch by wild giant pandas(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)in winter.Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2009,16(1):79-84.
    [58]李亚军,蔡琼,刘雪华,Songer M,武鹏峰,贾晓东,何祥博.海拔对大熊猫主食竹结构、营养及大熊猫季节性分布的影响.兽类学报,2016,36(1):24-35.
    [59]王丹林,郭庆学,王小蓉,梁春平,张远彬.海拔对岷山大熊猫主食竹营养成分和氨基酸含量的影响.生态学报,2017,37(19):6440-6447.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700