“双一流”大学建设绩效监测与评估:一个基于AHP理论的分析框架

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Building Chinese “Double-First Class” Universities:Research Performance Criteria and Dynamic Evaluation Based on AHP 作者：许长青 英文作者：XU Chang-qing;School of Government/The Center for Chinese Public Administration,Sun Yat-sen University; 关键词：“双一流”大学 ; 科研绩效 ; 评价标准 ; 监测评估 英文关键词：Double first class University;;research performance;;evaluation criteria;;monitoring and evaluating 中文刊名：JYJP 英文刊名：China Economics of Education Review 机构：中山大学中国公共管理研究中心/政治与公共事务管理学院; 出版日期：2018-07-25 出版单位：教育经济评论 年：2018 期：v.3;No.014 基金：2017年度教育部人文社科学研究一般项目“中国特色‘双一流’大学建设研究:战略、路径与绩效动态监测评估”(17YJA880083);; 国家高等教育质量常态监测数据中心(广州)开放基金资助项目“研究型大学科研投入-产出绩效评价标准及动态监测评估”;; 广东2016年软科学项目“广东区域协同创新主体深度融合研究:基于三重螺旋模型的理论构建、实践推理及修正路径”(2016A070705026) 语种：中文; 页：JYJP201804004 页数：19 CN：04 ISSN：10-1410/G4 分类号：28-46

摘要

本文在综合考察中外文献的基础上提出了"双一流"大学建设的基本理念:全球竞争力、全人类的学术价值追求以及卓越的社会服务。以经济学理论为基础,采用AHP技术整合指标体系,构建了"双一流"大学建设科研绩效评价标准及动态监测评估模型,明确了各指标的权重等级。在投入指标中,人力资源和科研经费是核心,凸显出人力资源在"双一流"大学建设中的关键作用及经费支持的基础性作用。在产出指标中,学术奖励、新增经费、新增基地、著作论文、知识产权等对科研产出绩效产生重大影响。优化绩效评估就必须要进一步完善指标体系,增强模型稳健性,实现静态与动态、定性与定量、政府主导与中介机构参与的有机统一。
        The paper has set up a research input and output performance evaluation criteria and dynamic monitoring model for the double first-class universities during their construction based on economics theory and AHP technology method,also has established the level of the weight of each index and its practical application system. The study found that in the input index,human resources and scientific research funds are the core factors. In the output index,academic awards,incremental high-level talent,funds,and research base and the total published academic papers have a significant impact on the scientific research output performance.

引文

韩立文、程栋星、欧冬舒,2006:《什么是世界一流大学?》,《北京大学教育评论》第4期。
    刘尧,2016:《中国“双一流”大学建设之路径选择》,《现代教育科学》第10期。
    Altbach,P.,2009,“Peripheries and Centers:Research Universities in Developing Countries”,Asia Pacific Education Review,10(1):15-27.
    Altbach,P.and J.Salm(Eds.),2011,The Road to Academic Excellence:The Making of World-Class Research Universities.Washington:The World Bank.
    Coelli,T.J.,D.S.P.Rao and G.E.Battese,1998,An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis,Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Farrell M J.,1957,“The Measurement of Production Efficiency”,Journal of Royal Statistical Society,120(3):253-281.
    Horta,H.,M.Sato and A.Yonezawa,2010,“Academic Inbreeding:Exploring Its Characteristicsand Rationale in Japanese Universities Using a Qualitative Perspective”,Asia Pacific Education Review,12(1):35-44.
    Mohrman,K.,W.Ma and D.Baker,2008,“The Research University in Transition:The Emerging Global Model”,Higher Education Policy,21(1):29-48.
    Rodie,A.R.and S.S.Klein.,2000.,“Customer Participation in Services Production and Delivery”,In Handbook of Services Marketing and Management,edited by T.Swartz and D.Iacobucci,Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage.
    Salmi,J.,2009,The Challenge of Establishing World-class Universities,Washington,DC:The World Bank.
    Shin,J.C.and W.Cummings,2010,“Multilevel Analysis of Academic Publishing across Disciplines:Research Preference,Collaboration,and Time on Research.”,Scientometrics,85(2):581-594.
    Wachtel,H.K.,1998,“Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness:A Brief Review”,Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education,23(2):191-212.