Determination of the number of J/ψ events with inclusive J/ψ decays
|
摘要
A measurement of the number of J/ψ events collected with the BESⅢ detector in 2009 and 2012 is performed using inclusive decays of the J/ψ. The number of J/ψ events taken in 2009 is recalculated to be(223.7±1.4)×10~6, which is in good agreement with the previous measurement, but with significantly improved precision due to improvements in the BESⅢ software. The number of J/ψ events taken in 2012 is determined to be(1086.9±6.0)×10~6. In total, the number of J/ψ events collected with the BESⅢ detector is measured to be(1310.6±7.0)×106, where the uncertainty is dominated by systematic effects and the statistical uncertainty is negligible.
A measurement of the number of J/ψ events collected with the BESⅢ detector in 2009 and 2012 is performed using inclusive decays of the J/ψ. The number of J/ψ events taken in 2009 is recalculated to be(223.7±1.4)×10~6, which is in good agreement with the previous measurement, but with significantly improved precision due to improvements in the BESⅢ software. The number of J/ψ events taken in 2012 is determined to be(1086.9±6.0)×10~6. In total, the number of J/ψ events collected with the BESⅢ detector is measured to be(1310.6±7.0)×106, where the uncertainty is dominated by systematic effects and the statistical uncertainty is negligible.
A measurement of the number of J/ψ events collected with the BESⅢ detector in 2009 and 2012 is performed using inclusive decays of the J/ψ. The number of J/ψ events taken in 2009 is recalculated to be(223.7±1.4)×10~6, which is in good agreement with the previous measurement, but with significantly improved precision due to improvements in the BESⅢ software. The number of J/ψ events taken in 2012 is determined to be(1086.9±6.0)×10~6. In total, the number of J/ψ events collected with the BESⅢ detector is measured to be(1310.6±7.0)×106, where the uncertainty is dominated by systematic effects and the statistical uncertainty is negligible.
引文
1 J.J.Aubert et al,Phys.Rev.Lett.,33:1404(1974)
2 J.E.Augustin et al,Phys.Rev.Lett.,33:1406(1974)
3 M.Ablikim et al(BESIII Collaboration),Nucl.Instrum.Methods A,614:345–399(2010)
4 M.Ablikim et al(BESIII Collaboration),Chin.Phys.C,36(10):915-925(2012)
5 S.Jadach,B.F.L.Ward,and Z.Was,Comput.Phys.Commu.130 :130(2000);S.Jadach,B.F.L.Ward,and Z.Was,Phys.Rev.D,63:113009(2001)
6 R.G.Ping,HEP&NP,32(8):599–602(2008)
7 D.J.Lange,Nucl.Instrum.Methods A,462:152–155(2001)
8 K.A.Olive et al(Particle Data Group),Chin.Phys.C,38(9):090001(2014)
9 J.C.Chen et al,Phys.Rev.D,62:1–8(2000)
10 R.L.Yang,R.G.Ping,and H.Chen,Chin.Phys.Lett.,31:061301(2014)
11 S.Agostinelli et al,Nucl.Instrum.Methods A,506:250–303(2003)
12 N.Berger et al,Chin.Phys.C,34(12):1779–1784(2010)
2 J.E.Augustin et al,Phys.Rev.Lett.,33:1406(1974)
3 M.Ablikim et al(BESIII Collaboration),Nucl.Instrum.Methods A,614:345–399(2010)
4 M.Ablikim et al(BESIII Collaboration),Chin.Phys.C,36(10):915-925(2012)
5 S.Jadach,B.F.L.Ward,and Z.Was,Comput.Phys.Commu.130 :130(2000);S.Jadach,B.F.L.Ward,and Z.Was,Phys.Rev.D,63:113009(2001)
6 R.G.Ping,HEP&NP,32(8):599–602(2008)
7 D.J.Lange,Nucl.Instrum.Methods A,462:152–155(2001)
8 K.A.Olive et al(Particle Data Group),Chin.Phys.C,38(9):090001(2014)
9 J.C.Chen et al,Phys.Rev.D,62:1–8(2000)
10 R.L.Yang,R.G.Ping,and H.Chen,Chin.Phys.Lett.,31:061301(2014)
11 S.Agostinelli et al,Nucl.Instrum.Methods A,506:250–303(2003)
12 N.Berger et al,Chin.Phys.C,34(12):1779–1784(2010)