岷江流域三江汇流区生态系统服务功能变化
|
摘要
[目的]分析岷江流域三江汇流区土地利用与生态服务功能的变化。[方法]以乐山市中区为例,对乐山市中区2005—2014年土地利用变化与生态系统服务功能变化进行评价。[结果]林地面积年均增加量最多(769.20 hm2),而园地面积减少最多(-488.90 hm2)。生态系统服务价值缓慢增加,10年平均增加875.99万元,主要归因于林地的年均增加值(2 007.68万元)。调节服务功能年均增加最多(398.53万元),而文化服务年均增加速度最快(1.75%)。气体调节功能的年均增加量最多(173.28万元),而文化娱乐功能的年均增加率最迅速(1.75%)。[结论]在今后的岷江流域三江汇流区的土地调控中,继续增加林地面积和保护耕地,为增加生态系统服务功能奠定良好的生态基础。
[Objective] The research aimed to analyze the changes of land use and ecological service functions in Sanjiang Confluence Area of Minjiang River Basin.[Method]Taking the central district of Leshan City as an example,the change of land use and ecosystem service function in the central district of Leshan City from 2005 to 2014 were evaluated. [Result]The annual increase of forest area was the largest( 769.20 hm2),while the decrease of garden area was the largest(-488.90 hm2).The ecosystem services value had slowly increased,with an average increase of RMB 8.759 9 million yuan in 10 years,mainly due to the annual increase of forest land value( RMB 20. 076 8 million yuan).The annual growth rate of mediation services was the highest( RMB 3. 985 3 million yuan),while the annual growth rate of cultural services was the fastest( 1.75%).The annual increase of gas regulation function was the highest( 1.732 8 million yuan),while the annual increase rate of cultural and entertainment function was the fastest( 1.75%). [Conclusion] In the future land regulation and control of the Sanjiang Confluence Area in the Lancang River Basin,the forest area will be increased and the cultivated land will be protected,which will lay a good ecological foundation for increasing the service function of the ecosystem.
[Objective] The research aimed to analyze the changes of land use and ecological service functions in Sanjiang Confluence Area of Minjiang River Basin.[Method]Taking the central district of Leshan City as an example,the change of land use and ecosystem service function in the central district of Leshan City from 2005 to 2014 were evaluated. [Result]The annual increase of forest area was the largest( 769.20 hm2),while the decrease of garden area was the largest(-488.90 hm2).The ecosystem services value had slowly increased,with an average increase of RMB 8.759 9 million yuan in 10 years,mainly due to the annual increase of forest land value( RMB 20. 076 8 million yuan).The annual growth rate of mediation services was the highest( RMB 3. 985 3 million yuan),while the annual growth rate of cultural services was the fastest( 1.75%).The annual increase of gas regulation function was the highest( 1.732 8 million yuan),while the annual increase rate of cultural and entertainment function was the fastest( 1.75%). [Conclusion] In the future land regulation and control of the Sanjiang Confluence Area in the Lancang River Basin,the forest area will be increased and the cultivated land will be protected,which will lay a good ecological foundation for increasing the service function of the ecosystem.
引文
[1]傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446.
[2]COSTANZA R,D’ARGE R,DE GROOT R,et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
[3]DAILY G C.Nature’s services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M].Washington,DC:Island Press,1997.
[4]Millennium Ecosystem Assessment(MEA).Ecosystems and human well-being:Synthesis[M].Washington,DC:Island Press,2005.
[5]FU B J,WANG S,SU C H,et al.Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services[J].Current opinion in environmental sustainability,2013,5(1):4-10.
[6]BRAAT L,TEN B P.The cost of policy inaction:The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target.Brussels[C].Belgium:The COPI Project,2008.
[7]高吉喜.划定生态保护红线,推进长江经济带大保护[J].环境保护,2016,44(15):21-24.
[8]程建,程久苗,吴九兴,等.2000~2010年长江流域土地利用变化与生态系统服务功能变化[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(6):894-901.
[9]XU C P,XIA B.Land use changes and its influences on ecosystem service value of resources-based city[J].Ecology and environmental sciences,2010,19(12):2887-2891.
[10]杨桂山,徐昔保,李平星.长江经济带绿色生态廊道建设研究[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(11):1356-1367.
[11]虎陈霞,郭旭东,连纲,等.长三角快速城市化地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:以嘉兴市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(3):333-340.
[12]尹占娥,田娜,殷杰,等.基于遥感的上海市湿地资源与生态服务价值研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(6):925-930.
[13]许妍,高俊峰,黄佳聪.太湖湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(6):646-652.
[14]李全,李腾,杨明正,等.基于梯度分析的武汉市生态系统服务价值时空分异特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(6):2118-2125.
[15]张骞,高明,杨乐,等.1988-2013年重庆市主城九区生态用地空间结构及其生态系统服务价值变化[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):566-575.
[16]王鹏涛,张立伟,李英杰,等.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].地理学报,2017,72(11):2064-2078.
[17]彭文甫,周介铭,罗怀良,等.城市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值损益估算:以成都市为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):43-51.
[18]武克军,王海军,白洁,等.西南山地旅游城市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J/OL].安徽农业科学,2018,46(20):66-69[2018-06-26].https://doi.org/10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2018.20.019.
[19]中华人民共和国国土资源部.全国土地利用总体规划纲要(2006—2020年)[A/OL].(2008-10-24)[2018-06-26].http://www.mlr.gov.cn/xwdt/jrxw/200810/t20081024_111040.htm.
[20]徐绍史.坚决守住18亿亩耕地红线[J].国家行政学院学报,2008(1):8-11.
[21]朱会义,李秀彬.关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论[J].地理学报,2003,58(5):643-650.
[22]王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):81-87.
[23]高志强,刘纪远,庄大方.中国土地资源生态环境背景与利用程度的关系[J].地理学报,1998,53(S1):36-43.
[24]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[25]谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[26]谢高地,肖玉,甄霖,等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3):10-13.
[2]COSTANZA R,D’ARGE R,DE GROOT R,et al.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
[3]DAILY G C.Nature’s services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M].Washington,DC:Island Press,1997.
[4]Millennium Ecosystem Assessment(MEA).Ecosystems and human well-being:Synthesis[M].Washington,DC:Island Press,2005.
[5]FU B J,WANG S,SU C H,et al.Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services[J].Current opinion in environmental sustainability,2013,5(1):4-10.
[6]BRAAT L,TEN B P.The cost of policy inaction:The case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target.Brussels[C].Belgium:The COPI Project,2008.
[7]高吉喜.划定生态保护红线,推进长江经济带大保护[J].环境保护,2016,44(15):21-24.
[8]程建,程久苗,吴九兴,等.2000~2010年长江流域土地利用变化与生态系统服务功能变化[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(6):894-901.
[9]XU C P,XIA B.Land use changes and its influences on ecosystem service value of resources-based city[J].Ecology and environmental sciences,2010,19(12):2887-2891.
[10]杨桂山,徐昔保,李平星.长江经济带绿色生态廊道建设研究[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(11):1356-1367.
[11]虎陈霞,郭旭东,连纲,等.长三角快速城市化地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:以嘉兴市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(3):333-340.
[12]尹占娥,田娜,殷杰,等.基于遥感的上海市湿地资源与生态服务价值研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(6):925-930.
[13]许妍,高俊峰,黄佳聪.太湖湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(6):646-652.
[14]李全,李腾,杨明正,等.基于梯度分析的武汉市生态系统服务价值时空分异特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(6):2118-2125.
[15]张骞,高明,杨乐,等.1988-2013年重庆市主城九区生态用地空间结构及其生态系统服务价值变化[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):566-575.
[16]王鹏涛,张立伟,李英杰,等.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J].地理学报,2017,72(11):2064-2078.
[17]彭文甫,周介铭,罗怀良,等.城市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值损益估算:以成都市为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):43-51.
[18]武克军,王海军,白洁,等.西南山地旅游城市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J/OL].安徽农业科学,2018,46(20):66-69[2018-06-26].https://doi.org/10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2018.20.019.
[19]中华人民共和国国土资源部.全国土地利用总体规划纲要(2006—2020年)[A/OL].(2008-10-24)[2018-06-26].http://www.mlr.gov.cn/xwdt/jrxw/200810/t20081024_111040.htm.
[20]徐绍史.坚决守住18亿亩耕地红线[J].国家行政学院学报,2008(1):8-11.
[21]朱会义,李秀彬.关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论[J].地理学报,2003,58(5):643-650.
[22]王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):81-87.
[23]高志强,刘纪远,庄大方.中国土地资源生态环境背景与利用程度的关系[J].地理学报,1998,53(S1):36-43.
[24]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[25]谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[26]谢高地,肖玉,甄霖,等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3):10-13.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |