近海渔业权冲突的法律路径分析
|
摘要
改革开放以来中国海洋经济迅速发展,但随着航运业、海上工程等新兴产业的发展,传统渔场呈现"管线交错,航线纵横"的状态,传统渔区日渐萎缩。再加之各省市伏季休渔期的不断延长,传统渔民生产作业的渔场面积逐渐减少,由此引发的近海海域养殖权和捕捞权的纠纷不断,甚至引发群体事件。养殖权和捕捞权均是渔业权的组成部分,但二者的概念特征与法律属性均存在差异。通过对二者冲突的分析,遵循处理海域纠纷的基本原则,可以采取构建渔业权双层结构、推行海域分层使用机制、建立海上役权、完善海上侵权补偿机制等解决路径。
Since the reform and opening up,China's marine economy has developed rapidly,but with the development of shipping industry,offshore engineering and other emerging industries,traditional fishing areas are shrinking day by day. At the same time,with the prolongation of the fishing suspension period in each province and city,the area of traditional fishing grounds has gradually decreased,resulting in continuous disputes over offshore aquaculture and fishing and even violent incidents. Both aquaculture and fishing are part of fishery rights,but their conceptual characteristics and legal attributes are different. Based on the analysis of the conflict between two concepts,following the basic principles of dispute settlement,we can adopt such solutions as building a double-tiered structure of fishery rights,implementing a hierarchical use mechanism of sea areas,establishing maritime servitude,and improving the compensation mechanism for maritime torts.
Since the reform and opening up,China's marine economy has developed rapidly,but with the development of shipping industry,offshore engineering and other emerging industries,traditional fishing areas are shrinking day by day. At the same time,with the prolongation of the fishing suspension period in each province and city,the area of traditional fishing grounds has gradually decreased,resulting in continuous disputes over offshore aquaculture and fishing and even violent incidents. Both aquaculture and fishing are part of fishery rights,but their conceptual characteristics and legal attributes are different. Based on the analysis of the conflict between two concepts,following the basic principles of dispute settlement,we can adopt such solutions as building a double-tiered structure of fishery rights,implementing a hierarchical use mechanism of sea areas,establishing maritime servitude,and improving the compensation mechanism for maritime torts.
引文
[1]张洪波.论渔业权与海域使用权的冲突及协调[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015,33(1):49.
[2]崔建远.论争中的渔业权[J].法商研究,2005(6):54-55.
[3]刘文钊,李志文.论渔业权及其性质[J].理论与改革,2015(5):156.
[4]崔建远.论争中的渔业权[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:134-144.
[5]税兵.论渔业权[J].现代法学,2005(2).
[6]许剑英,中国海洋法与渔业权[M].北京:法律出版社,2002:100.
[7]李显冬,刘志强.论矿业权的法律属性[J].当代法学,2009,23(2):104.
[8]申政武.从东亚法的视角观察中国的用益物权---中日韩三国制度异同的若干比较[J].当代法学,2008(1).
[9]郑志华,郑溶.渔权之争:论双边渔业协定应考量的若干问题[J].中国海商法研究,2014,25(1):75.
[10]崔建远.准物权研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
[11]刘舜斌.论渔业权与渔业许可---兼评《论争中的渔业权》[J].中国渔业经济,2008,26(6):5-11.
[12]崔建远.关于渔业权的探讨[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2003(3):36.
[13]孙宪忠.中国渔业权研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2006:58.
[14]刘惠明.日本的渔业权制度及对我国的启示[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(1):52.
[15]乐家华,刘丽燕.日本渔业的双重管理模式及发展方向[J].渔业经济研究,2008(6):34.
[16]全永波.海域使用权与渔业权冲突中的利益衡量[J].探索与争鸣,2007(5):50-54.
[17]谢在全.民法物权论(上)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2010:172.
[18]贾东明,郝作成.日本、韩国渔业权的法律性质及其主要内容[J].中国水产,2002(12):8.
[19]李荣存.非法养殖水产品损害赔偿问题研究[J].中国海商法研究,2013,24(1):58.
[2]崔建远.论争中的渔业权[J].法商研究,2005(6):54-55.
[3]刘文钊,李志文.论渔业权及其性质[J].理论与改革,2015(5):156.
[4]崔建远.论争中的渔业权[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006:134-144.
[5]税兵.论渔业权[J].现代法学,2005(2).
[6]许剑英,中国海洋法与渔业权[M].北京:法律出版社,2002:100.
[7]李显冬,刘志强.论矿业权的法律属性[J].当代法学,2009,23(2):104.
[8]申政武.从东亚法的视角观察中国的用益物权---中日韩三国制度异同的若干比较[J].当代法学,2008(1).
[9]郑志华,郑溶.渔权之争:论双边渔业协定应考量的若干问题[J].中国海商法研究,2014,25(1):75.
[10]崔建远.准物权研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
[11]刘舜斌.论渔业权与渔业许可---兼评《论争中的渔业权》[J].中国渔业经济,2008,26(6):5-11.
[12]崔建远.关于渔业权的探讨[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2003(3):36.
[13]孙宪忠.中国渔业权研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2006:58.
[14]刘惠明.日本的渔业权制度及对我国的启示[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(1):52.
[15]乐家华,刘丽燕.日本渔业的双重管理模式及发展方向[J].渔业经济研究,2008(6):34.
[16]全永波.海域使用权与渔业权冲突中的利益衡量[J].探索与争鸣,2007(5):50-54.
[17]谢在全.民法物权论(上)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2010:172.
[18]贾东明,郝作成.日本、韩国渔业权的法律性质及其主要内容[J].中国水产,2002(12):8.
[19]李荣存.非法养殖水产品损害赔偿问题研究[J].中国海商法研究,2013,24(1):58.