摘要
在我国古典目录中,针灸类的专著十分丰富,且长期归属于子部,分类相对稳定.但是在不同的时期、不同的目录书中,针灸类书目在子部之下二级目录的划分又有着较大的差别,这与针灸在各个时期的发展状况与目录书的成书过程有着密切关系.针灸类书目本身的演变过程与我国针灸学的发展息息相关,研究其分类及其演变对针灸学的发展有重要的推动作用.
In the classical catalogue of China,the monographs of acupuncture and moxibustion are veryrich,and they belong to the sub-section for a long time. The classification is relatively stable. However,in differ-ent periods and different catalogues,the acupuncture bibliography is in the secondary catalogue under the sub-section. There is a big difference in the division,which is closely related to the development of acupuncture invarious periods and the process of catalogue. The evolution of acupuncture and bibliography itself is closely relat-ed to the development of acupuncture in China,and the research on its classification and evolution to acupunc-ture. The study of its classification and evolution has an important role in promoting the development of acupunc-ture and moxibustion.
引文
[1]司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
[2]魏征、令狐德棻等.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[3]刘昫,等.旧唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
[4]宋祁,欧阳修,等.新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
[5]晁公武撰,孙猛校正.郡斋读书志校正[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2011.
[6]陈振孙撰,徐小蛮、顾美华点校.直斋书录解题[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2015.
[7]郑樵.通志[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
[8]脱脱.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[9]马端临.文献通考[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[10]黄虞稷撰,瞿凤起、潘景郑整理.千顷堂书目[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2001.
[11]钱谦益.绛云楼书目[M].收入王云五《丛书集成初编》[M].北京:商务印书馆,1935.
[12]张廷玉,等.明史[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[13]昀等.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
[14]赵尔巽,等.清史稿[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
[15]任锡庚.太医院志[M].清同治二年(1863)年.转引自:马堪温:《清道光帝禁针灸于太医院考》,载《上海中医药杂志》2002年4月.