海底管道整体屈曲摄动解与Galerkin解的对比分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Contrastive analysis of perturbation method and Galerkin method for global buckling of submarine pipeline 作者：吉婷婷 ; 李成凤 ; 刘润 英文作者：JI Ting-ting;LI Cheng-feng;LIU Run;State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety,Tianjin University; 关键词：海底管道 ; 水平向整体屈曲 ; 摄动法 ; Galerkin法 英文关键词：submarine pipeline;;lateral global buckling;;perturbation method;;Galerkin method 中文刊名：SDGK 英文刊名：Journal of Waterway and Harbor 机构：天津大学水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室; 出版日期：2019-04-28 出版单位：水道港口 年：2019 期：v.40;No.183 基金：国家自然科学基金面上项目(51679162);; 天津市自然基金重点项目(17JCZDJC39900) 语种：中文; 页：SDGK201902012 页数：5 CN：02 ISSN：12-1176/U 分类号：76-80

摘要

海底管道在高温高压下的整体屈曲是管道设计中需要考虑的重要问题。由于地基土体对管道作用的非线性特点,使得求解高温高压下海底管道整体屈曲变形的理论解非常困难。摄动法和Galerkin法是求解海底管道整体屈曲的重要方法。文章在考虑土体对管道抗力的分析模型基础上对海底管道水平向整体屈曲变形的摄动法解与Galerkin法解进行了对比,发现两者得到的结果差异较小,但Galerkin法求解过程复杂,计算量大,且土抗力的函数表达式较为单一。
        The global buckling of submarine pipeline subjected high temperature and pressure is an important issue in pipeline design.Because of the nonlinear characteristics of pipe-soil interaction, it is very difficult to get an analytical solution for global buckling of submarine pipeline. Perturbation method and Galerkin method are important methods to solve the global buckling of submarine pipeline. On the basis of nonlinear soil resistance,perturbation method and Galerkin method for the lateral global buckling were compared in this paper. It is found that the difference between two results is small, but the Galerkin method is more complicated and cost a larger calculation.

引文

[1]伊才颖,王琮,赵冬岩.深水海底管道铺设托管架模型试验研究[J].水道港口,2012,33(2):174-177.YI C Y,WANG C,ZHAO D Y.Research on model test of stinger applied in deepwater pipeline laying[J].Journal of Waterway and Harbor,2012,33(2):147-177.
    [2]李欢,刘子涵,欧阳峰.桩基-重力式靠船墩结构抗震特性研究[J].水道港口,2017(5):509-516.LI H,LIU Z H,OU Y F.Study on Seismic Behavior of Pile Foundation-Gravity Pier Structure[J].Journal of Waterway and Harbor,2017(5):509-516.
    [3]赵望奇,朱克强,张大朋,等.不同海流流向下海底管道牵引过程中的动力学响应[J].水道港口,2017(2):184-187.ZHAO W Q,ZHU K Q,ZHANG D P,et al.Dynamic response of submarine pipelines under different currents during traction[J].Journal of Waterway and Harbor,2017(2):184-187..
    [4]Hobbs R E.In-service buckling of heated pipelines[J].Journal of Transportation Engineering,1984,110(2):175-189.
    [5]Taylor N,Gan A B.Refined modelling for the lateral buckling of Submarine pipeline[J].Construct Steel Research,1986,6:143-162.
    [6]Verley R,Sotberg T.A Soil Resistance Model for Pipelines Placed on Sandy Soils[J].Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering,1994(116):145-153.
    [7]WANG Y,ZHANG X,ZHAO Y,et al.Perturbation analysis for upheaval buckling of imperfect buried pipelines based on nonlinear pipe-soil interaction[J].Ocean Engineering,2017,132:92-100.
    [8]Whiting A I M.A galerkin procedure for localized buckling of a strut on a nonlinear elastic foundation[J].International Journal of Solids & Structures,1997,34(6):727-739.