探讨不同微生物检验方法对念珠菌阴道炎患者阴道分泌物检验的效果
|
摘要
目的探讨不同微生物检验方法对念珠菌阴道炎患者进行阴道分泌物检验的效果。方法对2017年12月～2018年12月本院收治的51例念珠菌阴道炎患者进行观察和分析,均接受不同的微生物检验方法,分别是培养法、镜检法和凝集法,统计并对比不同微生物检验方法的阳性率。结果凝集法检验的阳性率为70.59%,培养法检验的阳性率为84.31%,镜检法检验的阳性率为98.04%,差异对比显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论相较于凝集法、培养法,念珠菌阴道炎患者进行镜检法检验的阳性率更高,值得在临床中应用。
Objective To investigate the effect of different microbial test methods on vaginal secretions in patients with candidal vaginitis. Methods 51 patients with candidal vaginitis admitted to our hospital from Dec.2017 to Dec. 2018 were observed and analyzed. All patients received different microbial testing methods, including culture method, microscopy method and agglutination method. The positive rates of different microbial testing methods were counted and compared. Results The positive rate of agglutination test was 70.59%, culture test was84.31%, and microscopy test was 98.04%. The difference was significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with agglutination method and culture method, the positive rate of microscopic examination for Candida vaginitis patients is higher, which is worthy of clinical application.
Objective To investigate the effect of different microbial test methods on vaginal secretions in patients with candidal vaginitis. Methods 51 patients with candidal vaginitis admitted to our hospital from Dec.2017 to Dec. 2018 were observed and analyzed. All patients received different microbial testing methods, including culture method, microscopy method and agglutination method. The positive rates of different microbial testing methods were counted and compared. Results The positive rate of agglutination test was 70.59%, culture test was84.31%, and microscopy test was 98.04%. The difference was significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with agglutination method and culture method, the positive rate of microscopic examination for Candida vaginitis patients is higher, which is worthy of clinical application.
引文
[1]李丹萍.用不同的微生物检验法对念珠菌阴道炎患者进行阴道分泌物检验的效果对比[J].当代医药论丛,2016,14(21):111-112.
[2]林开秀,阮艳秋.阴道分泌物念珠菌感染三种检测方法比较分析[J].实用医院临床杂志,2017,14(4):212-214.
[3]李叶静,吴晓莉,高晗.2 8 4例阴道炎患者阴道分泌物检验结果分析及危险因素研究[J].中国性科学,2017,26(2):45-48.
[4]胡立娟.复发性念珠菌性阴道炎易感因素调查与分析[J]实用妇科内分泌杂志(电子版),2016,3(5):99-100.
[5]张思思,夏维婷,周志阳,等.念珠菌性阴道炎发病机制及耐药机制的研究进展[J].中华全科医学,2017,15(11):1952-1955.
[6]蒋丽娟,左艳,刘芯如.霉菌性阴道炎感染患者生活习惯的调查与分析[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2017(6):37-39.
[7]阮继丹.16例复发性念珠菌性阴道炎诊治体会[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(30):208-209.
[8]Gaydos C A,Beqaj S,Schwebke J R,et al.Clinica Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis[J]Obstetrics&Gynecology,2017,130(1):181-189.
[9]李叶静,吴晓莉,高晗.284例阴道炎患者阴道分泌物检验结果分析及危险因素研究[J].中国性科学,2017(2).45-48.
[10]邓洪均.不同微生物检验法对阴道内念珠菌感染情况的检验效果比较[J].现代诊断与治疗,2016,27(2):330-331.
[2]林开秀,阮艳秋.阴道分泌物念珠菌感染三种检测方法比较分析[J].实用医院临床杂志,2017,14(4):212-214.
[3]李叶静,吴晓莉,高晗.2 8 4例阴道炎患者阴道分泌物检验结果分析及危险因素研究[J].中国性科学,2017,26(2):45-48.
[4]胡立娟.复发性念珠菌性阴道炎易感因素调查与分析[J]实用妇科内分泌杂志(电子版),2016,3(5):99-100.
[5]张思思,夏维婷,周志阳,等.念珠菌性阴道炎发病机制及耐药机制的研究进展[J].中华全科医学,2017,15(11):1952-1955.
[6]蒋丽娟,左艳,刘芯如.霉菌性阴道炎感染患者生活习惯的调查与分析[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2017(6):37-39.
[7]阮继丹.16例复发性念珠菌性阴道炎诊治体会[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(30):208-209.
[8]Gaydos C A,Beqaj S,Schwebke J R,et al.Clinica Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis[J]Obstetrics&Gynecology,2017,130(1):181-189.
[9]李叶静,吴晓莉,高晗.284例阴道炎患者阴道分泌物检验结果分析及危险因素研究[J].中国性科学,2017(2).45-48.
[10]邓洪均.不同微生物检验法对阴道内念珠菌感染情况的检验效果比较[J].现代诊断与治疗,2016,27(2):330-331.