科学-技术-产业关联视角下石墨烯发展国际比较——基于专利的计量研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：International Comparison of the Development of Graphene from the Perspective of Science-Technology-Industry Relevancy:Based on the Patentometrics Analysis 作者：彭帅 ; 张春博 ; 杨阳 ; 丁堃 英文作者：Peng Shuai;Zhang Chunbo;Yang Yang;Ding Kun;Institution of Science of Science and S&T Management in Dalian University of Technology; 关键词：专利引用 ; 非专利引文 ; 技术扩散能力 ; 科学关联度 ; 引用时滞 英文关键词：Patent citation;;Non-patent reference;;Capability of technical diffusion;;Science linkage;;Citing time lag 中文刊名：ZGKT 英文刊名：Forum on Science and Technology in China 机构：大连理工大学科学学与科技管理研究所; 出版日期：2019-04-05 出版单位：中国科技论坛 年：2019 期：No.276 基金：国家自然科学基金:基于引用极性和评论挖掘的论文综合评价模型研究(61772103);国家自然科学基金青年项目:论文-专利引证视角下的科学与技术知识演化分析方法(71704019) 语种：中文; 页：ZGKT201904022 页数：8 CN：04 ISSN：11-1344/G3 分类号：186-193

摘要

石墨烯逐渐成为纳米科技及产业发展中最引人注目的领域之一,也是世界许多国家激烈竞争的重要领域。从科学、技术、产业的相互关联中,揭示各国和地区的发展特征和竞争态势,对探寻中国石墨烯发展的优势和差距进而制定有效的政策具有重要意义。以专利数据为载体,通过科学-技术关联强度和产业技术扩散能力的测度发现:在8个主要国家和地区中,美国的科学-技术互动程度、产业技术扩散能力以及两者的相对匹配程度都处于领先地位;日韩对基础知识的吸收率较低,但是吸收速度较快;英国作为基础研究强国,但是其无论是科学与技术关联还是技术与产业的关联强度都较弱,产业化水平也落后于亚洲的中日韩等国;中国虽然起步较晚,但是,无论在科学与技术关联强度和产业技术扩散能力都表现出较强的发展态势。
        Graphene has gradually become one of the most remarkable field in the nanotechnology and industries,and it also has been a competitive area for many countries. From the perspective of relevancy of science,technology and industry,this paper reveals the development characteristics and competitive situation of main countries and regions,which is of great significance to explore the advantages and disadvantages of China in graphene field for formulating effective policies. Based on patent data,we measure and analyze eight major countries and regions through the science-technology association strength and industrial technology diffusion ability. The US takes the lead all in the Sci-Tech interaction,industrial technology diffusion capability and their matching degree. Japan and South Korea have lower absorption rate of basic knowledge,but with quicker speed. As a power in basic research,the UK lacks strength on whether SciTech interaction or industrial technology diffusion capability,and its industrialization level is also behind Asian countries such as China and Japan,Korea. Although starting late,China shows a strong development trend both in Sci-Tech interaction and industrial technology diffusion ability.

引文

[1]万勇,马廷灿,冯瑞华,等.国外石墨烯研发政策概览[J].新材料产业,2014(11):2-5.
    [2]李牧南,梁欣谊,朱桂龙.专利与理想度提升法则视角的石墨烯技术创新演化阶段识别[J].科研管理. 2017,38(2):10-17.
    [3]孙晓玲,丁.基于知识基因发现的科学与技术关系研究[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(6):23-26.
    [4]黄鲁成,刘玉敏,吴菲菲,等.基于专利全引用信息的技术知识扩散特征研究———以石墨烯技术为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017(4):149-161.
    [5]张鹏,雷家.基于科学的产业发展模式研究———以心电图和石墨烯产业为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(9):40-53.
    [6]LIU J,ZHANG M H,YOU C,et al. Patent analysis on graphene materials in lithium-ion batteries[C]//Applied Mechanics and Materials. Trans Tech Publications,2013,268:568-573.
    [7]胡光元,唐莉,刘云.中美在石墨烯领域的研究轨迹及政策建议[J].科研管理,2014,35(4):68-75.
    [8]CARPENTER M P,NARIN F. Validation study:patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence[J].World patent information,1983,5(3):180-185.
    [9]NARIN F,HAMILTON K S,OLIVASTRO D. Linkage between agency-supported research and patented industrial technology[J].Research evaluation,1995,5(3):183-187.
    [10]VAN LOOY B,ZIMMERMANN E,VEUGELERS R,et al. Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology[J].Scientometrics,2003,57(3):355-367.
    [11]VAN LOOY B,DEBACKERE K,CALLAERT J,et al. Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems:an exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains[J].Scientometrics,2006,66(2):295-310
    [12]VAN LOOY B,MAGERMAN T,DEBACKERE K. Developing technology in the vicinity of science:an examination of the relationship between science intensity(of patents)and technological productivity within the field of biotechnology[J]. Scientometrics,2007,70(2):441-458
    [13]ZHANG G,FENG Y,YU G,et al. Analyzing the time delay between scientific research and technology patents based on the citation distribution model[J].Scientometrics,2017,111(3):1287-1306.
    [14]殷媛媛.基于论文专利引证关系的科学技术互动研究———以立体显示为实证分析[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(16):65-70,74.
    [15]NARIN F,OLIVASTRO D. Linkage between patents and papers:an interim EPO/US comparison[J].Scientometrics,1998,41(1-2):51-59.
    [16]张鹏,雷家.基于科学的创新与产业:相关概念探究与典型产业识别[J].科学学研究,2015(9):1313-1323,1356.
    [17]樊霞,宋丽.基于科学的创新与产业技术能力构建———基于中日美生物技术产业的比较分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(3):3-11.
    [18]孙轶楠.基于专利引用的技术领域主题的知识流动时间研究[J].情报杂志,2015,34(7):95-99.
    [19]吴曼.基于科学计量的知识生产与技术开发时间关联分析[D].北京:中国科学技术信息研究所,2013.
    [20]文晓芬.基于专利引文的我国基础研究与技术创新的关联分析[D].北京:中国科学技术信息研究所,2011.
    [21]TRAJTENBERG M,HENDERSON R,JAFFE A. University versus corporate patents:a window on the basicness of invention[J].Economics of innovation and new technology,1997,5(1):19-50.