美国STEM教育研究30年:历程、特点与启示
|
摘要
美国STEM教育研究自1986年诞生起,经过30余年的发展,已引起了世界各国的广泛关注。文章首先通过文献分析,将美国STEM教育研究的发展历程分为发轫阶段、勃兴阶段和拓展阶段,并举例概述了各阶段STEM教育研究的具体情况。随后,文章从研究逻辑、研究思路与研究取向三个维度,分析了美国STEM教育研究的特点。最后,文章从学理探讨、顶层设计与实证探索三方面,分析了美国STEM教育研究对我国的启示,以期为我国STEM教育的研究与发展提供参考。
Since its emergence in 1986, STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education research in America has attracted great attention all over the world after more than 30 years of development. Firstly, through literature analysis, the development processes of STEM education research in America were divided into the initial stage, flourishing stage and expanding stage. Meanwhile, the specific situations of STEM education research in each stage were summarized with examples. Then, the characteristics of STEM education research in America were analyzed from three dimensions of research logic, research idea and research orientation. Finally, the enlightenment of STEM education research in America on our country was investigated from three aspects of theoretical discussion, top-level design and empirical exploration, expecting to provide reference for the research and development of STEM education in our country.
Since its emergence in 1986, STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education research in America has attracted great attention all over the world after more than 30 years of development. Firstly, through literature analysis, the development processes of STEM education research in America were divided into the initial stage, flourishing stage and expanding stage. Meanwhile, the specific situations of STEM education research in each stage were summarized with examples. Then, the characteristics of STEM education research in America were analyzed from three dimensions of research logic, research idea and research orientation. Finally, the enlightenment of STEM education research in America on our country was investigated from three aspects of theoretical discussion, top-level design and empirical exploration, expecting to provide reference for the research and development of STEM education in our country.
引文
[1]Wilson L.Innovation today,success tomorrow[OL].
[2][3]National Science Foundation.Undergraduate science mathematics and engineering education[OL].
[4]Murnane R J.Improving education indicators and economic indicators:The same problems?[J].Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,1987,(2):101-116.
[5]Kinney S.STEM professional development and resources[OL].
[6]Brunner D D.Inquiry and reflection:Framing narrative practice in education[M].Albany,NY:State University of New York Press,1994:162.
[7]National Science Foundation.Shaping the future:Strategies for revitalizing undergraduate education[OL].
[8]Clark A C,Ernst J V.A model for the integration of science,technology,engineering,and mathematics:Instead of producing skilled craftsmen or hobbyists,we are now to produce competent members of society with an array of knowledge and understanding of not only technology but also how it functions with and affects other content areas[J].Technology Teacher,2006,(4):24-26.
[9]Pascarella E T,Terenzini P T.How college affects students:A third decade of research(Volume 2)[M].San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,2005:11.
[10]Sattler J,Kiley T.It takes a village:Promoting multidisciplinary leadership through a professional development school(PDS)partnership[OL].
[11]Education Week.The push to improve STEM education[OL].
[12]Mendeley.The STEM workforce challenge[OL].
[13]National Science Foundation.National science board approved its national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S.science,technology,engineering,and mathematics education system[OL].
[14][15]OC STEM Ecosystem Learning Initirtive.Objectives[OL].
[16](美)罗伯特·M·卡普拉罗,玛丽·玛格丽特·卡普拉罗,詹姆斯·R·摩根著.王雪华,屈梅译.基于项目的STEM学习:一种整合科学、技术、工程和数学的学习方式[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2016:182.
[17]Adelson G.Project lead the way:A model program for initialing,funding and maintaining a successful pre-engineering program in the nation’s high schools[OL].
[18]California PLTW.Top accomplishments[OL].
[19]Huffman D,Lawrenz F,Thomas K,et al.Collaborative evaluation communities in urban schools:A model of evaluation capacity building for STEM education[J].New Directions for Evaluation,2006,(109):73-85.
[2][3]National Science Foundation.Undergraduate science mathematics and engineering education[OL].
[4]Murnane R J.Improving education indicators and economic indicators:The same problems?[J].Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,1987,(2):101-116.
[5]Kinney S.STEM professional development and resources[OL].
[6]Brunner D D.Inquiry and reflection:Framing narrative practice in education[M].Albany,NY:State University of New York Press,1994:162.
[7]National Science Foundation.Shaping the future:Strategies for revitalizing undergraduate education[OL].
[8]Clark A C,Ernst J V.A model for the integration of science,technology,engineering,and mathematics:Instead of producing skilled craftsmen or hobbyists,we are now to produce competent members of society with an array of knowledge and understanding of not only technology but also how it functions with and affects other content areas[J].Technology Teacher,2006,(4):24-26.
[9]Pascarella E T,Terenzini P T.How college affects students:A third decade of research(Volume 2)[M].San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,2005:11.
[10]Sattler J,Kiley T.It takes a village:Promoting multidisciplinary leadership through a professional development school(PDS)partnership[OL].
[11]Education Week.The push to improve STEM education[OL].
[12]Mendeley.The STEM workforce challenge[OL].
[13]National Science Foundation.National science board approved its national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S.science,technology,engineering,and mathematics education system[OL].
[14][15]OC STEM Ecosystem Learning Initirtive.Objectives[OL].
[16](美)罗伯特·M·卡普拉罗,玛丽·玛格丽特·卡普拉罗,詹姆斯·R·摩根著.王雪华,屈梅译.基于项目的STEM学习:一种整合科学、技术、工程和数学的学习方式[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2016:182.
[17]Adelson G.Project lead the way:A model program for initialing,funding and maintaining a successful pre-engineering program in the nation’s high schools[OL].
[18]California PLTW.Top accomplishments[OL].
[19]Huffman D,Lawrenz F,Thomas K,et al.Collaborative evaluation communities in urban schools:A model of evaluation capacity building for STEM education[J].New Directions for Evaluation,2006,(109):73-85.