用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于PSO-ELM的爆破块度预测研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on Blasting Fragmentation Prediction Based on PSO-ELM
  • 作者:王泽文 ; 左宇军 ; 赵明生 ; 刘强 ; 高正华
  • 英文作者:WANG Zewen;ZUO Yujun;ZHAO Mingsheng;LIU Qiang;GAO Zhenghua;Mining College,Guizhou University;Guizhou Xinlian Blasting Engineering Group Co.,Ltd;
  • 关键词:爆破块度 ; 粒子群算法 ; 极限学习机 ; 块度预测
  • 英文关键词:Blasting fragmentation;;Particle swarm optimization;;Extreme learning machine;;Fragmentation prediction
  • 中文刊名:KYYK
  • 英文刊名:Mining Research and Development
  • 机构:贵州大学矿业学院;贵州新联爆破工程集团有限公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-25
  • 出版单位:矿业研究与开发
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.227
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(51574093,51774101);; 贵州省高层次创新型人才培养项目(黔科合人才(2016)4011号)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KYYK201906027
  • 页数:4
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:43-1215/TD
  • 分类号:136-139
摘要
针对影响爆破块度因素之间的复杂非线性关系,利用粒子群算法(PSO)优化ELM(极限学习机)的输入权值与隐含层阈值,建立PSO-ELM爆破块度预测模型。以别斯库都克露天煤矿的实测数据为例,选取岩石抗拉强度、岩石抗压强度、炮孔间距、排距、最小抵抗线、超深、炸药单耗7个因素作为预测模型的输入因子,选取爆破块度的平均尺寸X50作为预测模型的输出因子。结果表明:PSO-ELM模型预测值与实测值的平均相对误差为5.6%,优于ELM模型的11.4%,具有更好的预测精确度;经PSO优化后的ELM模型,受隐含层节点数影响降低,稳定性增加,PSO-ELM模型更适用于爆破块度的预测。
        Aimed at complicated nonlinear relationship among factors affecting blasting fragmentation,the PSO-ELM blasting fragmentation prediction model was built by particle swarm optimization(PSO)to optimize input weights and hidden layer nodes of ELM(extreme learning machine).Taking the measured data of Biesikuduke open-pit coal mine as an example,the tensile strength of rock,the compressive strength of rock,the hole distance,the row distance,the minimum resistance line,the super-deep and the specific charge were selected as the input factors of the prediction model,and the average size of blasting fragmentation was selected as the output factor of the prediction model.The results showed that the average relative error between the measured and predicted values of the PSO-ELM model was 5.6%,which was better than that of 11.4% between the measured and predicted values of ELM model,and had better prediction accuracy.The influence of number of hidden layer nodes on the ELM model optimized by PSO was reduced,and the stability of this model was increased.Therefore,the PSOELM model was more suitable for the blasting fragmentation prediction.
引文
[1]汪雪清,单仁亮.人工神经网络在爆破块度预测中的应用研究[J].岩土力学,2008(11):529-531.
    [2]史秀志,王洋,黄丹,史采星.基于LS-SVR岩石爆破块度预测[J].爆破,2016,33(3):36-40.
    [3]Shi X Z,Zhou J,Wu B B,et al.Support vector machines approach to mean particle size of rock fragmentation due to bench blasting prediction[J].Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China,2012,22(2):432-441.
    [4]史秀志,郭霆,尚雪义,姬露露.基于PCA-BP神经网络的岩石爆破平均粒径预测[J].爆破,2016,33(2):55-61.
    [5]祝文化,朱瑞赓,夏元友.爆破块度预测的神经网络方法研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2001(1):60-62.
    [6]段宝福,费鸿禄.神经网络模型在台阶爆破块度预测中的应用[J].工程爆破,1999,5(4):25-29.
    [7]郝全明,杨振增.BP神经网络在岩层爆破参数优化中的应用[J].煤炭技术,2014,33(12):20-22.
    [8]杨成祥,冯夏庭.支持向量回归在岩土工程中的应用[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(5):563-566.
    [9]聂军,史秀志,陈新,等.基于GEP的露天台阶爆破块度预测模型[J].爆破,2015(2):82-88.
    [10]Huang G B,Zhu Q Y,Siew C K.Extreme learning machine:theory and applications[J].Neurocomputing,2006,70(1-3):489-501.
    [11]皮骏,马圣,贺嘉诚,等.基于IGA-ELM网络的滚动轴承故障诊断[J/OL].航空学报:1-13[2018-07-16].
    [12]Kennedy J,Eberhart R,Shi Y H.Swarm Intelligence[M].San Francisco,Cal,USA:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,2001:287-318.
    [13]李爱国,覃征,鲍复民,等.粒子群优化算法[J].计算机工程与应用,2002,38(21):1-3.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700