既有建筑节能改造市场运行理论研究综述
|
摘要
从激励政策、合同能源管理模式、能效标识制度和法律法规体系等方面分析国外既有建筑节能改造市场运行理论研究动态与实践特征,从主体行为博弈策略、融资模式、政府监管和试点示范工程等方面概述我国既有建筑节能改造市场运行理论研究成果与实践进展,剖析我国既有建筑节能改造市场存在的主体积极性不高、市场发展欠完善和市场运行动力缺乏等问题,为市场治理视角下既有建筑绿色改造市场运行理论研究方向的确定提供参考。
From the aspects of incentive policy,contract energy management mode,energy ef?ciency labeling system and legal and regulatory system,this paper analyzes the research trends and practical characteristics of the theoretical research on the operation of foreign energy-saving renovation market in existing buildings. From the aspects of subjects' behavioral game strategy,?nancing mode,government supervision and pilot demonstration project,summarizes the theoretical research results and practical progress of operation theory of China's energy-saving renovation market in existing buildings. Then,analyzes the problems of China's energy-saving renovation market of existing building,including the lack of enthusiasm of the main body,the imperfect market development and the lack of market operation power,provides reference for the theoretical research direction of the operational theory of green renovation market of existing building from the perspective of market governance.
From the aspects of incentive policy,contract energy management mode,energy ef?ciency labeling system and legal and regulatory system,this paper analyzes the research trends and practical characteristics of the theoretical research on the operation of foreign energy-saving renovation market in existing buildings. From the aspects of subjects' behavioral game strategy,?nancing mode,government supervision and pilot demonstration project,summarizes the theoretical research results and practical progress of operation theory of China's energy-saving renovation market in existing buildings. Then,analyzes the problems of China's energy-saving renovation market of existing building,including the lack of enthusiasm of the main body,the imperfect market development and the lack of market operation power,provides reference for the theoretical research direction of the operational theory of green renovation market of existing building from the perspective of market governance.
引文
[1]Tuominen P,Klobut K,Tolman A,et al.Energy savings potential in buildings and overcoming market barriers in member states of the European Union[J].Energy&Buildings,2012(51):48-55.
[2]Zvingilaite E.Modelling energy savings in the Danish building sector combined with internalisation of health related externalities in a heat and power system optimisation model[J].Energy Policy,2013(4):57-72.
[3]Murphy L.The policy instruments of European front-runners:effective for saving energy in existing dwellings?[J].Energy Efficiency,2014(2):285-301.
[4]Peckiene A,Komarovska A,Ustinovicius L.Overview of Risk Allocation between Construction Parties[J].Procedia Engineering,2013(1):889-894.
[5]Hufen H,Bruijn H D.Getting the incentives right.Energy performance contracts as a tool for property management by local government[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,112:2717-2729.
[6]Shonder J A.Achieving deeper energy savings in federal energy performance contracts[J].Ashrae Transactions,2015,121.
[7]Vreeken R C.The developed energy service company markets in the European Union.What lessons can be drawn for the development of the Dutch ESCO market?[J].2013.
[8]Labanca N,Suerkemper F,Bertoldi P,et al.Energy efficiency services for residential buildings:market situation and existing potentials in the European Union[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,109:284-295.
[9]Nord N,Stine Fj?rli Sj?thun.Success factors of energy efficiency measures in buildings in Norway[J].Energy&Buildings,2014(6):476-487.
[10]Da?a Majcen,Itard L,Visscher H.Actual heating energy savings in thermally renovated Dutch dwellings[J].Energy Policy,2016,97:82-92.
[11]Student J,Papyrakis E,Beukering P.Buildings behaving badly:A behavioral experiment on how different motivational frames influence residential energy label adoption in the Netherlands[J].Journal of Housing&the Built Environment,2017(1):107-132.
[12]Palme M,Guerra,José,Isalgué,Antoni,et al.LatinAmerican buildings energy efficiency policy:the case of Chile[M]//Sustainability in Energy and Buildings.2013.
[13]鲁华章.既有大型公共建筑节能激励机制研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2015.
[14]石锋,王要武,王一越.政府动态培育政策对建筑节能服务市场的影响研究[J].土木工程学报,2014(7):136-144.
[15]刘晓君,张晨曦.既有居住建筑节能改造中业主与ESCo进化博弈分析--基于合同能源管理模式(EMC)[J].建筑经济,2015(9):100-103.
[16]韩青苗,刘长滨,张洋,金占勇.非对称信息下既有建筑节能改造经济激励合约设计[J].土木工程学报,2009(8):129-133.
[17]李蕊,秦颖.我国节能服务产业融资租赁现状及问题研究[J].建筑经济,2016(5):84-86.
[18]李颖.PPP模式在建筑节能改造领域的应用研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2016.
[19]詹朝曦,贺勇,刘邦.基于“BOT+EMC”的既有建筑节能改造融资模式研究[J].建筑经济,2012(6):92-95.
[20]梁洋,毕既华.既有建筑改造的监管机制研究[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版),2011(1):31-34.
[21]王国庆.沈阳市既有建筑节能改造对策研究[D].沈阳:沈阳建筑大学,2011.
[22]张严柱.我国公共建筑节能政策设计原则与建议[J].建筑经济,2012(4):5-7.
[23]李新英.节能减排--基于市场与政府的双重作用[J].生态经济,2010(1):50-53.
[2]Zvingilaite E.Modelling energy savings in the Danish building sector combined with internalisation of health related externalities in a heat and power system optimisation model[J].Energy Policy,2013(4):57-72.
[3]Murphy L.The policy instruments of European front-runners:effective for saving energy in existing dwellings?[J].Energy Efficiency,2014(2):285-301.
[4]Peckiene A,Komarovska A,Ustinovicius L.Overview of Risk Allocation between Construction Parties[J].Procedia Engineering,2013(1):889-894.
[5]Hufen H,Bruijn H D.Getting the incentives right.Energy performance contracts as a tool for property management by local government[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,112:2717-2729.
[6]Shonder J A.Achieving deeper energy savings in federal energy performance contracts[J].Ashrae Transactions,2015,121.
[7]Vreeken R C.The developed energy service company markets in the European Union.What lessons can be drawn for the development of the Dutch ESCO market?[J].2013.
[8]Labanca N,Suerkemper F,Bertoldi P,et al.Energy efficiency services for residential buildings:market situation and existing potentials in the European Union[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,109:284-295.
[9]Nord N,Stine Fj?rli Sj?thun.Success factors of energy efficiency measures in buildings in Norway[J].Energy&Buildings,2014(6):476-487.
[10]Da?a Majcen,Itard L,Visscher H.Actual heating energy savings in thermally renovated Dutch dwellings[J].Energy Policy,2016,97:82-92.
[11]Student J,Papyrakis E,Beukering P.Buildings behaving badly:A behavioral experiment on how different motivational frames influence residential energy label adoption in the Netherlands[J].Journal of Housing&the Built Environment,2017(1):107-132.
[12]Palme M,Guerra,José,Isalgué,Antoni,et al.LatinAmerican buildings energy efficiency policy:the case of Chile[M]//Sustainability in Energy and Buildings.2013.
[13]鲁华章.既有大型公共建筑节能激励机制研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2015.
[14]石锋,王要武,王一越.政府动态培育政策对建筑节能服务市场的影响研究[J].土木工程学报,2014(7):136-144.
[15]刘晓君,张晨曦.既有居住建筑节能改造中业主与ESCo进化博弈分析--基于合同能源管理模式(EMC)[J].建筑经济,2015(9):100-103.
[16]韩青苗,刘长滨,张洋,金占勇.非对称信息下既有建筑节能改造经济激励合约设计[J].土木工程学报,2009(8):129-133.
[17]李蕊,秦颖.我国节能服务产业融资租赁现状及问题研究[J].建筑经济,2016(5):84-86.
[18]李颖.PPP模式在建筑节能改造领域的应用研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2016.
[19]詹朝曦,贺勇,刘邦.基于“BOT+EMC”的既有建筑节能改造融资模式研究[J].建筑经济,2012(6):92-95.
[20]梁洋,毕既华.既有建筑改造的监管机制研究[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版),2011(1):31-34.
[21]王国庆.沈阳市既有建筑节能改造对策研究[D].沈阳:沈阳建筑大学,2011.
[22]张严柱.我国公共建筑节能政策设计原则与建议[J].建筑经济,2012(4):5-7.
[23]李新英.节能减排--基于市场与政府的双重作用[J].生态经济,2010(1):50-53.