用户名: 密码: 验证码:
不同燃料循环方案的可持续性与经济性分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Sustainability and economy analysis of different fuel cycle options
  • 作者:丁文杰 ; 黄欢 ; 戴涛 ; 郭海兵
  • 英文作者:Ding Wenjie;Huang Huan;Dai Tao;Guo Haibing;Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry,CAEP;
  • 关键词:燃料循环 ; 平衡物质流 ; 可持续性 ; 平准化电力成本 ; 经济性
  • 英文关键词:fuel cycle;;balanced mass flow;;sustainability;;levelized cost of electricity;;economy
  • 中文刊名:QJGY
  • 英文刊名:High Power Laser and Particle Beams
  • 机构:中国工程物理研究院核物理与化学研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-20 09:34
  • 出版单位:强激光与粒子束
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.31;No.263
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(L172400024);; 中国工程院咨询项目
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:QJGY201905021
  • 页数:6
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:51-1311/O4
  • 分类号:108-113
摘要
基于核燃料循环政策技术的成熟度,选取了一次通过循环方案(OTC)、单次复用循环方案(TTC)、快堆闭式循环方案(FRC)及混合堆闭式循环方案(HRC)四种典型的核燃料循环方案进行分析。采用平衡物质流模型对不同燃料循环方案的可持续性进行研究,基于平准化电力成本计算方法对不同方案的燃料成本和乏燃料处置成本进行分析。研究结果表明:闭式燃料循环可极大减少核废料产生;燃料可自持的FRC方案及HRC方案可使用贫铀做燃料而不消耗天然铀;仅考虑燃料成本和乏燃料处置成本时,HRC方案的经济性最高而TTC方案的经济性最差。
        Based on the technology maturity,four typical nuclear fuel cycle options,namely,OTC,TTC,FRC and HRC,were selected for analysis.The sustainability of different fuel cycle options was studied using the balanced mass flow model,and the fuel cost and spent fuel disposal cost of different options were evaluated based on levelized cost of electricity calculation method.The results show that closed fuel cycle can greatly reduce the production of nuclear waste.And the FRC option with fuel self-supporting as well as the HRC option can use depleted uranium without consuming natural uranium.Besides,the HRC option is the most economical while the TTC option is the worst,considering only fuel cost and spent fuel disposal cost.
引文
[1]张小锋,张斌.我国中长期能源碳排放情景展望[J].中国能源,2016,38(2):38-42.(Zhang Xiaofeng,Zhang Bin.China's long-term energy carbon emission outlook.Energy of China,2016,38(2):38-42)
    [2]Deutch J,Driscoll M,Gray P E,et al.The future of nuclear power:An interdisciplinary MIT study[R].0-615-12420-8,2003.
    [3]Bunn M,Holdren J P,Fetter S,et al.The economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel[J].Nuclear Technology,2005,150(3):209-230.
    [4]Suzuki T.The fast reactor and its fuel cycle developments in Japan:Can Japan unlock its development path?[J].Science and Global Security,2009,17(1):68-76.
    [5]OECD/NEA.The economics of the nuclear fuel cycle[R].1990066X,1994.
    [6]徐銤.快堆和我国核能的可持续发展[J].现代电力,2006,2(5):106-110.(Xu Mi.The sustainable development of fast reactor and nuclear energy in China.Modern Electric Power,2006,2(5):106-110)
    [7]张建平,王琳.我国两种核燃料循环方案的经济分析与评价[J].中外能源,2015,20(6):35-41.(Zhang Jianping,Wang lin.Economic analysis and evaluation of two nuclear fuel cycle options in China.Sino-Global Energy,2015,20(6):35-41)
    [8]刘国明,邵增.混合能源堆裂变包层核燃料成本分析[J].核科学与工程,2017,37(1):154-160.(Liu Guoming,Shao Zeng.Fuel cost analysis for fission layer of fusion-fission hybrid reactor for energy.Nuclear Science and Engineering,2017,37(1):154-160)
    [9]丁晓明.从不同燃料循环模式分析快堆燃料循环的经济性[J].中国核电,2014,7(2):160-167.(Ding Xiaoming.Economic analysis of fast reactor fuel cycle with different modes.China Nuclear Power,2014,7(2):160-167)
    [10]彭先觉,王真.Z箍缩驱动聚变-裂变混合能源堆总体概念研究[J].强激光与粒子束,2014,26:090201.(Peng Xianjue,Wang Zhen.Conceptual research on Z-pinch driven fusion-fission hybrid reactor.High Power Laser and Particle Beams,2014,26:090201)
    [11]师学明.聚变裂变混合能源堆包层中子学概念研究[D].绵阳:中国工程物理研究院,2010.(Shi Xueming.Study on the neutrons concept of the fusion-fission hybrid reactor blanket.Mianyang:China Academy of Engineering Physics,2010)
    [12]De Roo G.Economics of nuclear fuel cycles:Option valuation and neutronics simulation of mixed oxide fuels[R].MIT-635981218,2009.
    [13]Hoffman E A,Hill R N,Taiwo T A.Advanced LWR multi-recycle concepts[J].Transactions of the American Nuclear Society,2005,93(13):363-364.
    [14]Quinn J E,Magee P M,Thompson M L,et al.ALMR fuel cycle flexibility[C]//Proceedings of the American Power Conference.1993,55(2):1079-1084.
    [15]Hoffman E A,Yang W S,Hill R N.Preliminary core design studies for the advanced burner reactor over a wide range of conversion ratios[R].ANL-AFCI-177,2008.
    [16]MIT.The future of the nuclear fuel cycle[R].978-0-9828008-4-3,2011.
    [17]Hamel J.An economic analysis of select fuel cycles using the steady-state analysis model for advanced fuel cycles schemes(SMAFS)[R].EPRI-1015387,2007.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700