中国信托登记制度研究
|
摘要
中国信托登记程序规则的缺失已深深影响信托业的发展,需进行体系化设计。比较法上,与中国情况较为类似的日本、韩国和中国台湾地区的信托登记程序规则借鉴意义较大,应充分参考。对于信托登记机构设置,应在中短期内奉行"实质分散登记,形式统一窗口"模式,远期随着中国统一的财产登记机构的形成而进行统一的信托登记。信托登记申请应充分吸收"共同申请为原则,单独申请为例外"的比较法成熟规则。信托登记的审查应抛开抽象的形式审查与实质审查之争,而以解决问题为导向。信托登记申请与审查规则的设计实施均应考虑与既有登记体系的衔接,按"渐进式"思路推进。
The absence of the procedure rules of China's trust registration has greatly affected the development of the trust industry, thus it needs a systematic design. In terms of comparison, the procedure rules of trust registration in Japan, Korea and Taiwan, which are similar to those in China,are of great significance for reference and should be fully referred to. As for the establishment of trust registration institutions, we should adopt the mode of "decentralized registration in nature, unified window in form" in the short and medium term, while in the long term, we should carry out the unified trust registration along with the formation of unified property registration institutions in China. As for the application for trust registration, we should fully adopt the mature rule of comparative method that is " joint application as the principle and separate application as the exception".The review of trust registration should put aside the dispute between abstract formal review and substantive review, and be problem-oriented. The design and implementation of the trust registration application and review rules should consider linking up with the existing registration system and promote it in a"gradual"way.
The absence of the procedure rules of China's trust registration has greatly affected the development of the trust industry, thus it needs a systematic design. In terms of comparison, the procedure rules of trust registration in Japan, Korea and Taiwan, which are similar to those in China,are of great significance for reference and should be fully referred to. As for the establishment of trust registration institutions, we should adopt the mode of "decentralized registration in nature, unified window in form" in the short and medium term, while in the long term, we should carry out the unified trust registration along with the formation of unified property registration institutions in China. As for the application for trust registration, we should fully adopt the mature rule of comparative method that is " joint application as the principle and separate application as the exception".The review of trust registration should put aside the dispute between abstract formal review and substantive review, and be problem-oriented. The design and implementation of the trust registration application and review rules should consider linking up with the existing registration system and promote it in a"gradual"way.
引文
[1]高凌云.收益权信托之合法性分析:兼析我国首例信托诉讼判决之得失[J].法学,2015,(7):148-159.
[2]吕红.论我国信托公示制度的完善[J].社会科学, 2004,(2):50-55.
[3]刘士国,高凌云,周天林.信托登记法律问题研究[J].政府法制研究,2009,(1):3-76+1.
[4]陆岷峰.关于金融本源和创新边界的研究[J].当代财经,2018,(9):62-69.
[5]蔡卫华,陈敦.探索建立不动产信托登记制度[J].中国土地,2016,(3):14-16
[6]王建文,郭逸霏.我国信托登记制度完善的法律路径[J].行政与法,2017,(11):98-106
[7]邱思萍.以不动产信托登记为视角论房地产投资信托基金的法律瓶颈[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(4):56-61
[8]顾华详.“一带一路”共建与比较法学研究[J].湖南财政经济学院学报,2018,(4):23-40.
[9]John H. Langbein. Why did Trust Law Become Statute Law in the United States?[J]. Yale Law Faculty Scholarship Series 1069, 2007,58:5-11.
[10]Mohamed Ramjohn. Text, Cases and Materials on Equity and Trusts, Rouledge Cavendish, 2008:6.
[11]Gary Watt. Cases and Materials on Equity and Trusts[M]. Oxford University Press, 2016:434-469.
[12]Karsten Schmidt, Trust as a Legislative Challenge:Bipolar Relation vs Quasi-Corporate Status?-Basic Trust Models in Legal Practice, Theory and Legislation[J]. European Review of Private Law, 2016,(6):980-995.
[13]孟强.信托登记制度研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:122.
[14]郑和斌.《信托登记试行办法》评析[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,(10):93-95.
[15]曹楠.我国信托型资产证券化中信托登记的效力[J].赤峰学院学报(自然科学版),2017,(11):81-82
[16]汤淑梅.信托登记制度的构建[J].法学杂志,2008,(6):137-139
[17]刘开委.我国信托登记制度的完善[J].华北金融,2017,(2):70-73
[18]谢哲胜.信托法[M].台北:元照出版有限公司,2014:102-103
[19]金鑫.中国信托财产公示制度研究[J].青海社会科学,2011,(4):70-74
[20]朱娇蕾.信托财产的破产隔离功能与公示制度[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(6):571-574
[21]刘贵生.浅析日本信托财产登记理论与实务[J].特区经济,2005,(9):207-208
[22]陈敦.我国台湾地区不动产信托登记的经验与借鉴[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2015,(3):78-82
[23]朱岩.形式审查抑或实质审查———论不动产登记机关的审查义务[J].法学杂志,2006,(6):106-109
[24]曹楠.论我国资产证券化中信托登记制度[J].哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报,2017,(5):66-69.
[2]吕红.论我国信托公示制度的完善[J].社会科学, 2004,(2):50-55.
[3]刘士国,高凌云,周天林.信托登记法律问题研究[J].政府法制研究,2009,(1):3-76+1.
[4]陆岷峰.关于金融本源和创新边界的研究[J].当代财经,2018,(9):62-69.
[5]蔡卫华,陈敦.探索建立不动产信托登记制度[J].中国土地,2016,(3):14-16
[6]王建文,郭逸霏.我国信托登记制度完善的法律路径[J].行政与法,2017,(11):98-106
[7]邱思萍.以不动产信托登记为视角论房地产投资信托基金的法律瓶颈[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(4):56-61
[8]顾华详.“一带一路”共建与比较法学研究[J].湖南财政经济学院学报,2018,(4):23-40.
[9]John H. Langbein. Why did Trust Law Become Statute Law in the United States?[J]. Yale Law Faculty Scholarship Series 1069, 2007,58:5-11.
[10]Mohamed Ramjohn. Text, Cases and Materials on Equity and Trusts, Rouledge Cavendish, 2008:6.
[11]Gary Watt. Cases and Materials on Equity and Trusts[M]. Oxford University Press, 2016:434-469.
[12]Karsten Schmidt, Trust as a Legislative Challenge:Bipolar Relation vs Quasi-Corporate Status?-Basic Trust Models in Legal Practice, Theory and Legislation[J]. European Review of Private Law, 2016,(6):980-995.
[13]孟强.信托登记制度研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:122.
[14]郑和斌.《信托登记试行办法》评析[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,(10):93-95.
[15]曹楠.我国信托型资产证券化中信托登记的效力[J].赤峰学院学报(自然科学版),2017,(11):81-82
[16]汤淑梅.信托登记制度的构建[J].法学杂志,2008,(6):137-139
[17]刘开委.我国信托登记制度的完善[J].华北金融,2017,(2):70-73
[18]谢哲胜.信托法[M].台北:元照出版有限公司,2014:102-103
[19]金鑫.中国信托财产公示制度研究[J].青海社会科学,2011,(4):70-74
[20]朱娇蕾.信托财产的破产隔离功能与公示制度[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(6):571-574
[21]刘贵生.浅析日本信托财产登记理论与实务[J].特区经济,2005,(9):207-208
[22]陈敦.我国台湾地区不动产信托登记的经验与借鉴[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2015,(3):78-82
[23]朱岩.形式审查抑或实质审查———论不动产登记机关的审查义务[J].法学杂志,2006,(6):106-109
[24]曹楠.论我国资产证券化中信托登记制度[J].哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报,2017,(5):66-69.