从“乡政村治”到“协同善治”:改革开放40年浙江乡村治理的逻辑进路
|
摘要
改革开放40年来,浙江村级治理与政府治理之间互动关系构成了乡村治理逻辑演变的主线。从改革开放初期对"政社合一"体制的初步调适,到村委会自治地位逐步得到法律确认和保护,到21世纪以来浙江农村税费改革过程中"乡—村"关系的互动博弈,再到精准扶贫与乡村振兴两大国家战略背景下乡村"多元共治"格局的日益形成,浙江乡村治理的逻辑进路呈现出从"乡政村治"到"协同善治"的特征,其背后折射出政府、村委会、村民、乡贤精英等多主体之间关系的不断调适与日渐成熟。
Since 1978, the interaction between village self-governance and township government in Zhejiang province has been the logical evolution of rural governance. From the initial adjustments to the "State and Society Integration" system at the early stage of reform and opening up to the legal confirmation of the village autonomy, to the interactive game of the relationship between village and local government with the tax and fee reform of rural Zhejiang in the 21 th century, and finally to the evolution of "multi-governing" model under the national strategy of Targeted Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization, the logic approach of rural governance in Zhejiang is characterized as being from "the separation of politics and society" to "coordinated governance", which reflects the cooperative relationship between the local government, village committee, villagers and rural elites in rural areas.
Since 1978, the interaction between village self-governance and township government in Zhejiang province has been the logical evolution of rural governance. From the initial adjustments to the "State and Society Integration" system at the early stage of reform and opening up to the legal confirmation of the village autonomy, to the interactive game of the relationship between village and local government with the tax and fee reform of rural Zhejiang in the 21 th century, and finally to the evolution of "multi-governing" model under the national strategy of Targeted Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization, the logic approach of rural governance in Zhejiang is characterized as being from "the separation of politics and society" to "coordinated governance", which reflects the cooperative relationship between the local government, village committee, villagers and rural elites in rural areas.
引文
[1]贺雪峰.农民行动逻辑与乡村治理的区域差异[J].开放时代,2007(1):105-121.
[2]徐勇,项继权.村民自治进程中的乡村关系[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2003.
[3]金太军.村庄治理与权力结构[M].广州:广东人民出版社,2008.
[4]陈祥英.论乡镇政府的行政管理与村民自治的有效衔接和良性互动[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2009.
[5]赵树凯.乡村关系:在控制中脱节——10省(区)20乡镇调查[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005(5):2-9.
[6]改革开放四十年“浙江省联产承包第一村”寻梦再出发[EB/OL].(2018-09-13)[2019-01-15].http://n.cztv.com/news/12995618.html.
[7]胡文木.国家与社会关系中浙江乡村治理的转型[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2010(3):104-110.
[8]折晓叶,陈婴婴.超级村庄的基本特征及“中间”形态[J].社会学研究,1997(6):37-45.
[9]王立胜.农村税费改革背景下的乡村关系[J].社会主义研究,2006(3):86-89.
[10]浙江非国有经济年鉴编委会.浙江非国有经济年鉴2005[M].北京:中华书局,2005.
[11]唐玉.中国乡村协商治理的发展与探索:以浙江为例[J].浙江学刊,2017(5):183-187.
[12]“三农”问题的浙江答卷[N].浙江日报,2017-06-23(3).
[2]徐勇,项继权.村民自治进程中的乡村关系[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2003.
[3]金太军.村庄治理与权力结构[M].广州:广东人民出版社,2008.
[4]陈祥英.论乡镇政府的行政管理与村民自治的有效衔接和良性互动[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2009.
[5]赵树凯.乡村关系:在控制中脱节——10省(区)20乡镇调查[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005(5):2-9.
[6]改革开放四十年“浙江省联产承包第一村”寻梦再出发[EB/OL].(2018-09-13)[2019-01-15].http://n.cztv.com/news/12995618.html.
[7]胡文木.国家与社会关系中浙江乡村治理的转型[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2010(3):104-110.
[8]折晓叶,陈婴婴.超级村庄的基本特征及“中间”形态[J].社会学研究,1997(6):37-45.
[9]王立胜.农村税费改革背景下的乡村关系[J].社会主义研究,2006(3):86-89.
[10]浙江非国有经济年鉴编委会.浙江非国有经济年鉴2005[M].北京:中华书局,2005.
[11]唐玉.中国乡村协商治理的发展与探索:以浙江为例[J].浙江学刊,2017(5):183-187.
[12]“三农”问题的浙江答卷[N].浙江日报,2017-06-23(3).