美国私立学校资助政策中的权力博弈关系研究——基于资源依赖理论的分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Research on the Power Game Relationship in the Financial Support Policy of American Private Schools——Based on the Analysis of Resource Dependence Theory 作者：孔曼 英文作者：KONG Man;Faculty of Education,East China Normal University; 关键词：美国私立学校 ; 资助政策 ; 权力博弈 ; 资源依赖理论 英文关键词：American private school;;funding policy;;power game;;Resource Dependence Theory 中文刊名：JYLL 英文刊名：Theory and Practice of Education 机构：华东师范大学教育学部; 出版日期：2019-02-10 出版单位：教育理论与实践 年：2019 期：v.39;No.675 基金：上海市教育重点科研项目“上海集团化办学的政策设计和路径研究”(项目编号:A1504)的阶段性研究成果 语种：中文; 页：JYLL201904005 页数：6 CN：04 ISSN：14-1027/G4 分类号：23-28

摘要

私立学校与政府之间不对称的资源依赖关系带来政府对私立学校外部权力的扩张,以及政府的监管权与私立学校的办学自主权之间的博弈。美国政府与私立学校的权力博弈关系在有无政府资助两种条件下呈现完全不同的样态,私立学校通过采取反应型和创造型相结合的策略有效改善了办学自主权弱势的现象。借鉴美国的经验,当前,我国治理政府与非营利性民办学校的权力冲突问题可采取以下策略:明确政府参与管理私立学校的重要意义;民办学校应减少对政府资金单一依赖并开拓新的资金来源;坚持特色办学,通过提高教育质量和服务水平增加自身资源的重要性和竞争优势。
        The asymmetric resource dependence between the private schools and the government has brought about the expansion of government as an external power to private schools and the game between the government's regulatory power and the autonomy of private schools. The power game relationship between the US government and the private schools presents a completely different pattern under the two conditions with government funding and without government funding. Private schools have effectively improved the autonomy of schools through the combination of reactive and creative strategies. Drawing on the experience of the United States,China can adopt the following strategies to address the problem of power conflicts between the government and the non-profit private schools:clarifying the importance of government participation in the management of private schools; reducing private schools' dependence on government funds and opening up new sources of funding; and sticking to the characteristic education to highlight the importance of education and the competitive advantage by improving the quality of education and service.

引文

[1]Pfeffer J,Salancik G R.The External Control of Organizations:AResource Dependence Perspective[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,1979,23(2):123-133.
    [2]张咏梅.政府-企业关系中的权力、依赖与动态均衡——基于资源依赖理论的分析[J].兰州学刊,2013,(7):150-154.
    [3]杰佛利·菲佛,杰勒尔德·R·萨兰基克.组织的外部控制——对组织资源依赖的分析[M].北京:东方出版社,2006.
    [4]Saidel Judith.Resource Interdependence:The Relationship between State Agencies and Nonprofit Organizations[M].Public Administration Review,1991,51(6):543-553.
    [5]Bertola G,Checchi D.Who Chooses Which Private Education?Theory and International Evidence[J].Labour,2013,27(3):249-271.
    [6]陶西平.中国民办教育[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2010.358-363
    [7]Smolarski,Neil Wilner,Weifang Yang.The Use of Financial Information by Private Equity Funds in Evaluating New Investments[J].Review of Accounting and Finance,2011,10(1).
    [8]吴忠魁.私立学校比较研究[J].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999.118.
    [9]陈立,刘华.美国政府对私立学校的责任述评[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2012,34(4):48-53.
    [10]Kober N.Lessons from Other Countries about Private School Aid:Higher Public Funding for Private Schools Usually Means More Government Regulation[J].Elementary Secondary Education,1998,(21):2-18.
    [11]Barrera,Felipe.Decentralized Decision-Making in Schools:The Theory arcd Evidence on School-Based Marcagemerct[J].The World Bank Publications,2009,(9):1-116.
    [12]Hanushek,Eric A.The Failure of Input-based Schooling Policies[J].The Economic Journal,2003,(113):64-98.
    [13]Woessmann L,Luedemann E,Schuetz G,et al.School Accountability,Autonomy and Choice Around the World[J].Ludger Woessmann,2009,99(3):7-9.
    [14]Publishing O.Public and Private Schools:How Management and Funding Relate to Their Socio-Economic Profile[J].Oecd Publishing,2012,(5):106.
    [15]Timothy R Erich.Public Funding of Private Schools;Pitfalls and Possibilities[D].Riverside City:La Sierra University,2013.
    [16]Publishing O.Public and Private Schools:How Management and Funding Relate to Their Socio-Economic Profile[J].Oecd Publishing,2012,(5):106.
    [17]马凤岐.对高等学校的第二轮放权:基于资源依赖理论的视角[J].高等教育研究,2015,36(10):37-48.