地域主体功能导向的江汉平原乡村发展能力时空变化
|
摘要
新时代背景下的乡村发展面临严峻挑战,提升乡村发展能力是实施乡村振兴战略的基础工程,对农产品主产区的乡村可持续发展更具有特殊意义。以江汉平原为案例,2005—2014年为研究期,以外源驱动和内生响应解构乡村发展能力、构建测度指标体系,以熵权法解析乡村发展能力、揭示时空变化特征。研究表明:①江汉平原县域乡村发展能力不断提高,并呈现明显的空间集聚态势和东西分异格局;②外源驱动是江汉平原乡村发展能力的主要组分,其中城镇化驱动是主要能力贡献源;③外源驱动型是江汉平原乡村发展的主要地域类型,内外动力均衡型则具有良好的发展潜力。
The rural development is facing severe challenges in the background of socio-economic transformation.Promoting the rural development capacity is the foundation for rural revitalization and plays a more essential role in rural sustainable development of the main agricultural production regions. Taking Jianghan Plain as research area, this article divides the rural development capacity into exogenous driving capacity and endogenous response capacity, constructs its evaluation index system which is composed of urbanization, industrialization, marketization and globalization, and analyzes its spatial and temporal evolution from 2005 to 2014. The results show that: 1) As a whole, the rural development capacity of Jianghan Plain shows the growth trend from 2005 to 2014 and obvious spatial agglomeration and differentiation between its west and east. 2) The major component of the rural development capacity in Jianghan Plain is exogenous driving capacity which is mostly derived by urbanization. 3) On the base of the ratio of endogenous response capacity to exogenous driving capacity, regional development of Jianghan Plain has been classified into three types, including exogenous driving area, endogenous driving area and balance area. Furthermore, at present, the primarily type in Jianghan Plain is the exogenous driving area. At the same time, the counties show good potential for achieving higher rural development capacity. Eventually, these results can provide theoretical guidance for the achievement of rural revitalization and the basis for formulating the policy for the rural sustainable development of Jianghan Plain.
The rural development is facing severe challenges in the background of socio-economic transformation.Promoting the rural development capacity is the foundation for rural revitalization and plays a more essential role in rural sustainable development of the main agricultural production regions. Taking Jianghan Plain as research area, this article divides the rural development capacity into exogenous driving capacity and endogenous response capacity, constructs its evaluation index system which is composed of urbanization, industrialization, marketization and globalization, and analyzes its spatial and temporal evolution from 2005 to 2014. The results show that: 1) As a whole, the rural development capacity of Jianghan Plain shows the growth trend from 2005 to 2014 and obvious spatial agglomeration and differentiation between its west and east. 2) The major component of the rural development capacity in Jianghan Plain is exogenous driving capacity which is mostly derived by urbanization. 3) On the base of the ratio of endogenous response capacity to exogenous driving capacity, regional development of Jianghan Plain has been classified into three types, including exogenous driving area, endogenous driving area and balance area. Furthermore, at present, the primarily type in Jianghan Plain is the exogenous driving area. At the same time, the counties show good potential for achieving higher rural development capacity. Eventually, these results can provide theoretical guidance for the achievement of rural revitalization and the basis for formulating the policy for the rural sustainable development of Jianghan Plain.
引文
[1] Ploeg J D V D,Renting H,Brunori G,et al. Rural development:From practices and policies towards theory[J]. Sociologia Rura‐lis,2000,40(4):391-408.
[2]李智,张小林.中国地理学对乡村发展的多元视角研究及思考[J].人文地理,2017,32(5):1-8.
[3] Halfacree K H. The importance of‘the rural’in the constitution of counterurbanization:Evidence from England in the 1980s[J].Sociologia Ruralis,1994,34(2-3):164-189.
[4] Frey W H. Migration and depopulation of the metropolis:Regional restructuring or rural renaissance[J]. American Sociolog‐ical Review,1987,52(2):240-257.
[5] Wilson G A. From productivism to post-productivism and back again? Exploring the(un)changed natural and mental land‐scapes of European agriculture[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,2001,26(1):77-102.
[6] Woods M. Rural geography III:Rural futures and the future of rural geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2012,36(1):125-134.
[7] McCarthy J. Rural geography:Globalizing the countryside[J].Progress in Human Geography,2008,32(1):129-137.
[8] McCarthy J. Rural geography:Multifunctional rural geographies-reactionary or radical?[J]. Progress in Human Geogra‐phy,2005,29(6):322-334.
[9] Lowe P,Marsden T,Murdoch J,et al. The Differentiated Countryside[M]. London:Routledge,2003.
[10]余斌,卢燕,曾菊新,等.乡村生活空间研究进展及展望[J].地理科学,2017,37(3):375-385.
[11]龙花楼,李婷婷,邹健.我国乡村转型发展动力机制与优化对策的典型分析[J].经济地理,2011,31(12):2 080-2 085.
[12]张京祥,申明锐,赵晨.超越线性转型的乡村复兴——基于南京市高淳区两个典型村庄的比较[J].经济地理,2015,35(3):1-8.
[13]龙花楼,李裕瑞,刘彦随.中国空心化村庄演化特征及其动力机制[J].地理学报,2009,64(10):1 203-1 213.
[14]乔家君,刘嘉俊,谢淼.欠发达农区村域空心化特征及其微观机理——以兰考县三个村为例[J].人文地理,2011,26(6):98-102,160.
[15]李平星,陈诚,陈江龙.乡村地域多功能时空格局演变及影响因素研究——以江苏省为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(7):845-851.
[16]李婷婷,龙花楼.基于“人口—土地—产业”视角的乡村转型发展研究——以山东省为例[J].经济地理,2015,35(10):149-155.
[17]李裕瑞,刘彦随,龙花楼.黄淮海典型地区村域转型发展的特征与机理[J].地理学报,2012,67(6):771-782.
[18] Woods M. Engaging the global countryside:Globalization,hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place[J]. Progress in Hu‐man Geography,2007,31(4):485-507.
[19] Nelson L,Nelson P B. The global rural:Gentrification and linked migration in the rural USA[J]. Progress in Human Ge‐ography,2011,35(4):441-459.
[20]房艳刚,刘继生.基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨——超越“现代化”发展范式[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):257-270.
[21]张富刚,刘彦随.中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式[J].地理学报,2008,63(2):115-122.
[22]唐林楠,刘玉,潘瑜春,等.基于BP模型和Ward法的北京市平谷区乡村地域功能评价与分区[J].地理科学,2016,36(10):1 514-1 521.
[23] Marsden T. Rural futures:The consumption countryside and its regulation[J]. Sociologia Ruralis,1999,39(4):501-520.
[24]张勇,冯健.理性、流动与家庭——村民日常生活语境下的乡村性转型[J].人文地理,2016,31(6):49-57.
[25]刘玉,刘彦随,郭丽英.基于SOFM的环渤海地区乡村地域功能分区[J].人文地理,2013,28(3):114-120.
[26]鲁莎莎,刘彦随,关兴良.农业地域功能的时空格局与演进特征——以106国道沿线典型样带区为例[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(3):67-75.
[27]李航,李雪铭,田深圳,等.城市人居环境的时空分异特征及其机制研究——以辽宁省为例[J].地理研究,2017,36(7):1 323-1 338.
[28]周礼,蒋金亮.长三角城市旅游竞争力综合评价及其空间分异[J].经济地理,2015,35(1):173-179.
[29]卓蓉蓉,余斌,曾菊新,等.湖北省经济空间格局演变与经济空间战略效应[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):37-45.
[30]李裕瑞,刘彦随,龙花楼.黄淮海地区乡村发展格局与类型[J].地理研究,2011,30(9):1 637-1 647.
(1)详见《省人民政府关于印发<湖北省主体功能区规划》的通知》(鄂政发[2012]106号)。
[2]李智,张小林.中国地理学对乡村发展的多元视角研究及思考[J].人文地理,2017,32(5):1-8.
[3] Halfacree K H. The importance of‘the rural’in the constitution of counterurbanization:Evidence from England in the 1980s[J].Sociologia Ruralis,1994,34(2-3):164-189.
[4] Frey W H. Migration and depopulation of the metropolis:Regional restructuring or rural renaissance[J]. American Sociolog‐ical Review,1987,52(2):240-257.
[5] Wilson G A. From productivism to post-productivism and back again? Exploring the(un)changed natural and mental land‐scapes of European agriculture[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,2001,26(1):77-102.
[6] Woods M. Rural geography III:Rural futures and the future of rural geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2012,36(1):125-134.
[7] McCarthy J. Rural geography:Globalizing the countryside[J].Progress in Human Geography,2008,32(1):129-137.
[8] McCarthy J. Rural geography:Multifunctional rural geographies-reactionary or radical?[J]. Progress in Human Geogra‐phy,2005,29(6):322-334.
[9] Lowe P,Marsden T,Murdoch J,et al. The Differentiated Countryside[M]. London:Routledge,2003.
[10]余斌,卢燕,曾菊新,等.乡村生活空间研究进展及展望[J].地理科学,2017,37(3):375-385.
[11]龙花楼,李婷婷,邹健.我国乡村转型发展动力机制与优化对策的典型分析[J].经济地理,2011,31(12):2 080-2 085.
[12]张京祥,申明锐,赵晨.超越线性转型的乡村复兴——基于南京市高淳区两个典型村庄的比较[J].经济地理,2015,35(3):1-8.
[13]龙花楼,李裕瑞,刘彦随.中国空心化村庄演化特征及其动力机制[J].地理学报,2009,64(10):1 203-1 213.
[14]乔家君,刘嘉俊,谢淼.欠发达农区村域空心化特征及其微观机理——以兰考县三个村为例[J].人文地理,2011,26(6):98-102,160.
[15]李平星,陈诚,陈江龙.乡村地域多功能时空格局演变及影响因素研究——以江苏省为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(7):845-851.
[16]李婷婷,龙花楼.基于“人口—土地—产业”视角的乡村转型发展研究——以山东省为例[J].经济地理,2015,35(10):149-155.
[17]李裕瑞,刘彦随,龙花楼.黄淮海典型地区村域转型发展的特征与机理[J].地理学报,2012,67(6):771-782.
[18] Woods M. Engaging the global countryside:Globalization,hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place[J]. Progress in Hu‐man Geography,2007,31(4):485-507.
[19] Nelson L,Nelson P B. The global rural:Gentrification and linked migration in the rural USA[J]. Progress in Human Ge‐ography,2011,35(4):441-459.
[20]房艳刚,刘继生.基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨——超越“现代化”发展范式[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):257-270.
[21]张富刚,刘彦随.中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式[J].地理学报,2008,63(2):115-122.
[22]唐林楠,刘玉,潘瑜春,等.基于BP模型和Ward法的北京市平谷区乡村地域功能评价与分区[J].地理科学,2016,36(10):1 514-1 521.
[23] Marsden T. Rural futures:The consumption countryside and its regulation[J]. Sociologia Ruralis,1999,39(4):501-520.
[24]张勇,冯健.理性、流动与家庭——村民日常生活语境下的乡村性转型[J].人文地理,2016,31(6):49-57.
[25]刘玉,刘彦随,郭丽英.基于SOFM的环渤海地区乡村地域功能分区[J].人文地理,2013,28(3):114-120.
[26]鲁莎莎,刘彦随,关兴良.农业地域功能的时空格局与演进特征——以106国道沿线典型样带区为例[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(3):67-75.
[27]李航,李雪铭,田深圳,等.城市人居环境的时空分异特征及其机制研究——以辽宁省为例[J].地理研究,2017,36(7):1 323-1 338.
[28]周礼,蒋金亮.长三角城市旅游竞争力综合评价及其空间分异[J].经济地理,2015,35(1):173-179.
[29]卓蓉蓉,余斌,曾菊新,等.湖北省经济空间格局演变与经济空间战略效应[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):37-45.
[30]李裕瑞,刘彦随,龙花楼.黄淮海地区乡村发展格局与类型[J].地理研究,2011,30(9):1 637-1 647.
(1)详见《省人民政府关于印发<湖北省主体功能区规划》的通知》(鄂政发[2012]106号)。