用户名: 密码: 验证码:
预冷终压对蔬菜真空预冷失水率的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effect of precooling final pressure on water lossr rate of vegetables in vacuum precooling
  • 作者:李新平 ; 臧润清 ; 董杰
  • 英文作者:Li Xinping;Zang Runqing;Dong Jie;Tianjin Key Laboratory of Refrigeration Technology, Tianjin Refrigeration Engineering Technology Center,Tianjin University of Commerce;
  • 关键词:预冷终压 ; 失水率 ; 补水率
  • 英文关键词:Precooling final pressure;;Water loss rate;;Water recharge rate
  • 中文刊名:DWYC
  • 英文刊名:Cryogenics & Superconductivity
  • 机构:天津商业大学天津市制冷技术重点实验室天津市制冷技术工程中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-23 18:32
  • 出版单位:低温与超导
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.47
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DWYC201905015
  • 页数:7
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:34-1059/O4
  • 分类号:79-84+94
摘要
为研究真空预冷过程中预冷终压对蔬菜的影响,总结不同类型蔬菜的最佳预冷终压,取菠菜、娃娃菜、茄子为三类蔬菜代表,将其在不同预冷终压下进行预冷效果比对,并对各类蔬菜进行最佳预冷终压验证,确定最佳补水率及补水方式。结果表明,最佳预冷终压为:叶菜类800 Pa,含蜡质层类700 Pa,根茎及茄果类600 Pa。最佳补水率为:对应终压下的失水率,但不应超过自身重量的4%。对比直接预冷、直接补水、包覆膜补水,包覆膜补水效果最好。通过实验总结各类蔬菜不同预冷终压下的失水率并寻找最佳保护措施,可以有效降低真空预冷中蔬菜的质量损耗以及制冷系统能耗。
        To study the effect of precooling pressure in vacuum precooling and summarize the optimal precooling final pressure of different vegetables, these vegetables of spinach, baby vegetable and eggplant were selected as three types of vegetables, and the precooling effects were compared under different precooled final pressures. Choosing different vegetables verified the optimal precooling final pressure. Determined the optimal water recharge rate and water recharge method. The results show the optimal precooling final pressure is 800 Pa for the leafy vegetables, 700 Pa for the waxes layer vegetables, and 600 Pa for the roots fruit tomato class. The optimal water recharge rate should be water loss rate under the corresponding final pressure. But it should not exceed 4% of its own weight. Compared with direct precooling, direct water replenishment, and coating replenishment, the effect of coating replenishment is best. Summarizing the water loss rate of various vegetables under different precooling final pressure, best protection measures can effectively reduce the food loss and the energy consumption of the refrigeration system in vacuum precooling.
引文
[1] 申江,刘洋,邹同华,等.几种蔬菜真空预冷的对比实验研究[J].制冷学报,2005,26(3):12-15.
    [2] BROSNAN T,SUN Dawen.Precooling techniques and applications for horticultural products -A review [J].International Journal of Refrigeration,2001,24(2):154-170.
    [3] 郑秋丽,王清,高丽朴,等.蔬菜保鲜包装技术的研究进展[J].食品科学,2018,39(3):317-323.
    [4] 陈颖,刘宝林,宋晓燕.荷兰豆真空预冷及其对贮藏品质的影响[J].食品科学,2013,34(6):276.
    [5] NGUYEN,宋晓燕,刘宝林,等.不同终压对火龙果切片真空预冷效果的影响[J].制冷学报,2012,33(1):74-78.
    [6] 邸倩倩,杨兆丹,刘斌,等.真空预冷压力对双孢菇贮藏效果的研究[J].保鲜与加工,2016,16(6):30-35.
    [7] 刘恩海,石卫光,潘嘉信.不同蔬菜真空预冷效果对比及鲜切生姜预冷保鲜试验研究[J].食品科技,2017,42(7):44-49.
    [8] MUKAMA M,AMBAW A,BERRY T M,et al.Energy usage of forced air precooling of pomegranate fruit inside ventilated cartons[J].Journal of Food Engineering,2017,215:126-113.
    [9] 潘嘉信,刘恩海.茼蒿真空预冷过程捕水器捕水特性理论分析及预冷工艺试验研究[J].食品科技,2017,42(2):99-104.
    [10] XU Fangfang,JIN Xin,ZHANG Lu,et al.Investigation on water status and distribution in broccoli and the effects of drying on water status using NMR and MRI methods[J].Food Research International,2017(96):191-197.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700